Yeah I don't know what the solution is but something is wrong here. Maybe refund mistakes or take responsibility.
Meta says if its AI makes a mistake, it will legally be the customer's fault (cio.com)
18 pointsby wyclif2 days ago10 comments
proc0 2 days ago
So I guess if I'm a contractor and doing a job for Meta, not only can I completely fail and they still pay me but if I do something illegal it's on them for hiring me, right??
janderson215 a day ago
The difference between us and agents, paradoxically, is that the agents do not have any agency.
ezst a day ago
There's no paradox, there never were agents to begin with. Those are programs. It's same old software. If you sell me a software to do X and you fail to deliver, it's on you.
janderson215 12 hours ago
Except that the users obstruct the programs and now it is really important to not leave them unattended for too long, apparently.
cyanydeez a day ago
Meta says: "We have more lawyers and lobbyists than you!"
hidude562 2 days ago
Not a legal expert, but that sounds like a trojan horse. Does this mean if a bad actor were to use Meta's model, that if they bypass the safegaurds that they get off scot-free?
fwlr a day ago
Not to worry. The customer can shrug and say “rogue agents took unaligned actions”, and they too will be absolved of liability.
Right?
31337Logic 2 days ago
Related: please see Edward Snowden's latest talk. This whole liability shifting has become a tragedy that we must stop. For humanity's sake.