Honestly the last thing I thought would happen would be that it would get lost. I thought maybe it would get confused on the road, but it drove better than most human drivers.
Waymo in Toronto (waymo.com)
tcoop25 7 hours ago
sssilver 7 hours ago
wombat-man 7 hours ago
nunez 6 hours ago
eeje1 6 hours ago
I’ve seen them around in London - they are incredibly slow. There’s no way they’ll succeed here - speed is important for getting around.
This is what happens when people who live in a bubble automatically assume what works there must scale and make economic sense to the rest of the world.
vidarh 6 hours ago
IshKebab an hour ago
That and cyclists/pedestrians can be kind of anywhere at any time. Again not a quite the same in America.
We'll see I guess.
kenhwang 12 minutes ago
They're just really cautious and do need an extra 10s to think sometimes, and there's a lot of driving scenarios that don't allow that much time to decide to go or not. The biggest culprit seems to be unprotected intersections with the potential for human/bike crossing, which includes driveways which they insist on using for dropoffs (even when they're obviously not public driveways), which they then take a very long time to leave.
pj_mukh 6 hours ago
gboss 6 hours ago
spankalee 4 hours ago
jjmarr 5 hours ago
I wonder how reliant self-driving cars are on unchanging road infrastructure.
liljacob 3 hours ago
stephen_cagle 11 minutes ago
SenHeng 7 hours ago
I'm so going to ride in one once they're open to the public.
weitendorf 7 hours ago
They really do feel like magic, and give you palpable proof that you’re living in the future.
bluefirebrand 7 hours ago
I get the idea that you no longer need a driver for a cab, but in my mind all that means is there's an unemployed former cab driver who is explicitly worse off now. The likelihood of that person having tons of great options to go do now that they aren't burdened by driving a cab is pretty low imo?
There's probably a name for this somewhere, some kind of automation paradox that makes "society" better but many individuals lives worse.
As an individual it's hard for me to understand why anyone is excited about it though
weitendorf 6 hours ago
This is why our standard of living is much better now than it was 150 years ago. Even though we have autoamted pretty much all of the jobs since then, except teacher and lawyer (there is another term in economics for what happens here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect)
Personally I think it's fine, even as my own profession undergoes the same transition. We now have new jobs in running the waymo fleet in various capacities - the cars still need to be serviced, cleaned, supported, scheduled, etc - and the highly compensated jobs designing what are essentially real-world robots that can safely coexist with humans on the road. This is how technology has always worked and it's always made us better off on the whole.
Also, the new product is just better. When a human is not in the car, it's ok for to leave them waiting for a few minutes to pick me up if it's not a busy street, and I don't have to deal with the risk of an unsafe or unsavory person hosting me in their personal vehicle. I can control the music and the AC, and tap a button to have the car pull over. I can and do still take Lyfts and Ubers when I need to - it's cheaper for anything involving the highway, still, and better when I need to get somewhere in a hurry.
ipaddr 6 hours ago
Never as good pay and many end up on the system.
weitendorf 6 hours ago
My grandparents performed jobs that now are rarely performed in the US due to there being better jobs for those qualified to perform them.
I am much happier working with AI and distributed systems than as a carpenter or steel mill foreman like my grandfathers. Everybody on my father's side of the family had these white marks all over their forearms from molten metal splashing on them and burning them as they worked.
This is only possible because of technological progress. It creates new jobs.
SenHeng 5 hours ago
My grandfather was a sailor, then cook. Father drives a taxi. Mom is a seamstress. Stepdad worked at the same factory for 65 years. As I was coming of age in the 90s, they chastised me for spending all my time in front of the computer. Yet here I am still sitting in front of one, making more money than they could've ever imagined.
Society progresses whether or not you want it.
cman1444 6 hours ago
Living standards would be a lot worse today if we still had to pick crops in the field by hand.
bluefirebrand 6 hours ago
They still have to pay the Waymo though, it didn't become free. :/
You're kidding yourself if you think autonomous taxis will be cheaper in the long run just because they don't pay a driver.
They will outcompete human drivers on cost and once they are dominant they will raise prices. This has happened every other time human labor was replaced too. It is practically the Silicon Valley playbook.
cman1444 5 hours ago
The cost to watch a movie today through streaming is not more than it was when you had to go to a movie theater to see one.
The cost to buy and sell financial instruments today through Robinhood or similar products is not more than when you had to have a broker to place orders for you.
The cost to find vast amounts of information through search engines is negligible today. To do so previously would take immense amounts of time, effort, and money parsing through encyclopedias is the information even existed at the time.
The cost to print a few drafts of a memo today requires a single session typing into Microsoft word and then printing to your office printer. Previously you had to pay a typist to put together multiple drafts for you.
On autonomous vehicles:
Yes they will absolutely be cheaper, as long as a complete monopoly is avoided. It's not just that you don't have to pay the driver. You also will have vastly lower insurance rates due to how safe they are. Maintenance costs will be lower due to economies of scale when fleet operators can have the car deliver itself to a dedicated massive maintenance facility.
FireBeyond 2 hours ago
Now you just have to maintain multiple subscriptions to streaming services so you can watch the movie you want. $22/month for Hulu, $27/month for Netflix, Amazon Prime where you pay for the privilege of paying to rent some movies.
So you might be able to watch more with your subscription, but the nexus isn't quite that simple.
pj_mukh 6 hours ago
bethekidyouwant 6 hours ago
bluefirebrand 6 hours ago
Yes yes I'm aware of the fallacy
It's obviously not the whole picture though. When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?
vidarh 6 hours ago
Large scale automation is only a problem if society allows it to become a problem.
bluefirebrand 6 hours ago
When I look around me I see a society that I think would happily have jackboots round up excess labor and execute us rather than redistribute money fairly
So I wish I had your optimism
throwawaytea 4 hours ago
If you gave everyone $10k a month UBI, who is going to change your tire? How much you have to pay them to go to work if they get $10k while sitting at home?
If a town has a lack of apartments, how much will an apartment cost if a young couple has $20k a month to spend?
bluefirebrand 2 hours ago
Currently, people need money to pay for necessities like food and shelter. Therefore either money is redistributed somehow or people have jobs to earn money, or we change the paradigm entirely to something else
We cannot have both no wealth redistribution AND replace all labour with automation without really messing this system up
This seems pretty obvious to me?
vidarh an hour ago
vidarh an hour ago
visarga an hour ago
jryle70 6 hours ago
When was that? Or hypothetical? Why would that be and not that new jobs being created?
DataDive 6 hours ago
IMHO jobs were far less specialized in the past. Working in a factory is not that different from working in a kitchen or laying tile.
Take Muhammad, a fresh arrival from Syria, who drives a taxi. What will his next job be that is that easy and he already knows how to do?
SenHeng 5 hours ago
But actually, what I've commonly heard from immigrants from developing countries is not having their certifications recognised. What was once a surgeon/lawyer/accountant is now forced to do menial labour. So maybe that's one problem to consider solving.
jagraff 6 hours ago
With driving specifically - human-driven cars are perhaps the greatest danger to my life. I very much would prefer to live in a future where human beings are not in charge of piloting multi-ton vehicles at life threatening speeds in the same areas I walk around.
maffyoo 6 hours ago
DataDive 6 hours ago
You don't have to be "productive" all the time. As you put it, driving the car is not just a chore - things happen along the way. It can be a chore - I just contest the most unproductive label here.
By this token, sleeping is the most unproductive thing in the world. Except you recharge.
SenHeng 5 hours ago
Turns out, spend a couple hours on the road everyday and you'll quickly get sick of podcasts or ebooks. You can't stop to look up details or check out the code/math/design because you're driving. You can't really do anything else too because you really should be focusing your attention on the road.
maffyoo 3 hours ago
lbrito 2 hours ago
Agreed. So lets build dense cities and efficient mass public transit, right? ...Right?
solyin an hour ago
jnsie 5 hours ago
stasomatic 2 hours ago
strictnein an hour ago
stasomatic an hour ago
s1artibartfast 43 minutes ago
stasomatic 16 minutes ago
solyin an hour ago
stasomatic an hour ago
tpurves 2 hours ago
joshuat 6 hours ago
david-gpu 6 hours ago
From the viewpoint of a pedestrian, having more "drivers" that don't get distracted on their phone sounds blissful.
There are real concerns about the additional pro-car lobbying we will likely experience, as Waymo will discourage people directly and indirectly from taking transit and cycle, but I hope we can coexist.
alephnerd 4 hours ago
paxy 3 hours ago
estearum 2 hours ago
alasano 2 hours ago
tjwebbnorfolk 2 hours ago
r0fl an hour ago
I learn this each time Apple releases a product. New iPhones could be $500, 10x the speed, half the weight and full week battery life and a fringe loud group will post and upvote some dumb complaint.
sfmike an hour ago
sbuttgereit an hour ago
I'm sure you were already aware of that, but its easy to forget that and think you're dealing with something more real.
Terr_ an hour ago
8note an hour ago
doginasuit 22 minutes ago
efromvt 3 minutes ago
zombittack 7 hours ago
I only say this hoping Toronto is not like "The Wild West" and hopefully has protections around these tech companies stealing jobs and hording wealth in the interest of public efficiencies.
9991 7 hours ago
This is bananas. Cops are not experts in the law. I'm sure a competent district attorney would be able to throw somebody in jail for this.
hbn 6 hours ago
temp84858696945 6 hours ago
hbn 6 hours ago
gruez 6 hours ago
Crashed prod? Straight to jail.
CountHackulus 5 hours ago
gruez 5 hours ago
JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago
It's a joke–a riff on a Parks and Recs meme making fun of Venezuela at the time. We don't jail aircraft engineers when they make a mistake because just sending people to jail doesn't work as well as encouraging them to co-operate ex post facto so the root cause can be identified.
gruez 2 hours ago
Poe's law strikes again. Of course nobody thinks crashing prod should result in jail, or most software engineers would have spent some time behind bars by now. However it's entirely unclear whether @CountHackulus meant "of course autonomous car engineers should be jailed, just as if an engineer signed off on faulty plans" (which to be fair, also happens), or is just repeating my joke with bridges.
JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago
You'd be surprised at how many intelligent people really do want this.
tjwebbnorfolk an hour ago
JumpCrisscross an hour ago
azan_ 6 hours ago
soco 5 hours ago
JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago
When we start taking idiot drivers' licenses away, sure. Otherwise this is a silly overreaction with a calculable cost in human lives.
boplicity 6 hours ago
Makeitmakesense 2 hours ago
tuna74 an hour ago
boplicity 17 minutes ago
mitthrowaway2 6 hours ago
gruez 6 hours ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2%80%932011_Toyota_vehic...
Teever 6 hours ago
https://apnews.com/article/robot-germany-sexual-assault-colo...
Can you extend that to this situation?
mech4bg 6 hours ago
It wasn't luck though, the cars are incredibly cautious around people. Yes the car did the wrong thing here, but it wasn't driving at speed or endangering people.
jester997 6 hours ago
jonaustin 6 hours ago
> wasn't...endangering people
There's a bit of a disconnect there.
UltraSane 6 hours ago
mahboi 5 hours ago
Revanche1367 2 hours ago
People make mistakes like that all the time, and sometimes they still get ticketed for that kind of thing, and other times they get a simple warning or don't get any form of rebuke at all. How many of us have never accidentally gone into a one-way traffic lane from the opposite side and managed to still drive through and get back on track without killing or maiming anybody? It's unlikely anybody would get charged with a crime for this, nor should they over a simple mistaken rule violation that did no harm.
spankalee 6 hours ago
It's bad, and obviously shouldn't have happened, but the car is cautious around people and didn't hit anyone. It's a far better failure mode than the typical case of a human who drives into a crowd.
pj_mukh 6 hours ago
When people point out "reckless" behavior of autonomous cars to me, the conversation simply isn't worth having unless you're comparing to current conditions. We're looking at 40,000 deaths per year so, endless community meetings and hand-wringing around regulations is not an option, unless we're ready to first stop all human driving and have the same process for those.
[1]:https://abc7news.com/post/80-year-old-san-francisco-driver-k...
mlmonkey 6 hours ago
gruez 6 hours ago
And that's an easy case to prosecute too, because the driver clearly broke laws beyond just "crashing into people":
>when they were killed by Lau, driving 70 miles an hour in the residential area of West Portal in San Francisco.
janalsncm 6 hours ago
Horrifying. Life is short, enjoy what you have.
1shooner 5 hours ago
Why?
pj_mukh 4 hours ago
Process B has killed none to do the same job.
I'm sure per mile driven, there is an "acceptable death rate", but should we atleast wait till the autonomous cars are on the board to make that a priority?
michalhosna 4 hours ago
There are drive-by-wire cars on the road. ABS systems can disable breaks.
If a malfunction is caused by the control software of that car or a mechanical malfunction by bad design it seems to me like the same thing. Do you/we don't have a solution for that already?
infecto 2 hours ago
I would be shocked if that was the case.
nullishdomain 2 hours ago
I also live in Denver, and while the quote is technically true, it is misleading. A Waymo did drive into a farmers market...before there were barricades up, when other cars were still driving through as well for set-up time. Nobody would have been charged with anything.
> “It entered through our food truck area,” said Nicole Jarman, the production director of the farmers market... there was a “Road Closed” sign on one side of the street, but the other side of the street was still open to vendor traffic during set up and the Waymo followed a vendor vehicle past the sign and then turned onto the 1400 block of South Pearl Street.
> “It’s still load-in, our barricades are moved to the side, so there’s vehicular access, and it followed that traffic, went slow, and then made its way on out at Arkansas and kept going” she said.
> “It was not anything that made us nervous,” Jarman said.
[0]: https://kdvr.com/news/local/waymo-drives-through-denver-farm...
stephen_cagle 5 minutes ago
A taxi company that kept a drunk employed might be liable for damages that drunk causes, same rules should apply to your own self driving fleet.
ilamont an hour ago
https://waymo.com/blog/shorts/back-to-boston/
There apparently is a concerted effort to deny Waymo the legislative changes it needs, driven by a concern about job loss:
fidotron 8 hours ago
Montreal would be the ultimate test, both climatically and just for navigating sheer chaos. Those Roadster jets may finally make a smooth ride throughout the whole of the city possible.
oblio 7 hours ago
The ultimate test would be Cairo or Mumbai or Lagos :-)
jstummbillig 7 hours ago
oblio 7 hours ago
ChrisMarshallNY 7 hours ago
It was absolute chaos. They had "half-cars" driving around (front-wheel-drive cars, with the back end missing, and replaced with a rickety wooden cart; sometimes, just like a drag cart, with no wheels).
heyodai 7 hours ago
ChrisMarshallNY 6 hours ago
I was just a kid, so point of view was limited.
jscott817 7 hours ago
jjsullivan5196 7 hours ago
beedeebeedee 39 minutes ago
palijer 7 hours ago
Fricken 7 hours ago
the_sleaze_ 7 hours ago
0x457 5 hours ago
Which is weird because humans would take a few seconds to check the line and switch it, while Waymo already knows its empty and not taking an advantage of it.
Insanity 7 hours ago
fidotron 6 hours ago
Freezing rain, for example. My god.
sandworm101 7 hours ago
Montreal is a vacation compared to the great plains/prairies: -40 with half the road coved by blown snow. Lets see how the navigation system reacts to a total absence of painted lines and visible curbs. Or go to the rocky mountains. I doubt Montreal streets contain any mountain passes worthy of naming.
rikthevik 7 hours ago
I'm generally enthusiastic for electric vehicles, but batteries and FSD don't really work in a 12 hour blizzard at -40. Doesn't match my use case. :)
freedomben 7 hours ago
sdenton4 7 hours ago
sandworm101 6 hours ago
philistine 6 hours ago
philistine 6 hours ago
You're talking about one variable I'm familiar with, but it's one variable. With snow cover in a plain, you just drive much slower and turn on your hazards.
sandworm101 5 hours ago
tuna74 an hour ago
Terr_ 35 minutes ago
Headlights of cars in various states, and some drivers think they have them fully on when they don't.
alex1138 7 hours ago
pothole observed. Diverting a-
pothole observed. d-
pothole.
po-
fidotron 7 hours ago
Insanity 7 hours ago
You’re either dodging construction site, homeless people, or just sitting in traffic.
speed_spread 5 minutes ago
forgotTheLast 5 hours ago
dgacmu 7 hours ago
Uncle_Brumpus 6 hours ago
I was visiting my brother there shortly after the bus-hole happened, and the winter market had several vendors selling bus-hole related merch. I regret not buying any.
joenot443 7 hours ago
Toronto's winter driving is normally very reasonable compared to Montreal. My guess is the Waymos operate some ~355 days a year, taking days off after big storms.
verelo 7 hours ago
fidotron 7 hours ago
Basically if the planes are flying the robotaxis will need to work.
joenot443 an hour ago
My understanding is Uber etc. charge and pay based on demand, so if that means the (fewer) human drivers are that much more expensive on snowy days then so be it. If it's a blizzard and Uber fares work out to $100/h I'd be very surprised if drivers couldn't be found.
FireBeyond 2 hours ago
Don't hear many anecdotes about FSD in Pittsburgh on a night in January...
gegtik 7 hours ago
fidotron 7 hours ago
That is not uniformly true throughout the metro area, especially in the major burbs.
qkeast 6 hours ago
DataDive 6 hours ago
kimos 4 hours ago
So much of winter driving is knowing what is blocked by ice and snow, what snow is probably safe to pass, and navigating around piles of ice and snow that become temporary obstacles.
Granted Toronto gets much less accumulation than a city like Montréal.
humanlion87 an hour ago
CountHackulus 7 hours ago
mech4bg 7 hours ago
creaturemachine 6 hours ago
Being in mixed traffic, streetcars are easily blocked by disabled vehicles or straight-up idiots. The time between launch and one of these things sperging out and blocking streetcars will be measured in minutes.
why_at 5 hours ago
FWIW I've never been to Toronto but legally I could go there and drive without knowing about this particular rule. If it's something unique to the area and has the potential for danger I'd be more worried about people than robots.
graypegg 2 hours ago
The main difference is going to be scale and the chaos that brings. You see a LOT of streetcars in Toronto. For a huge chunk of downtown, it's the main subway-ish transit option. Some of the lines are on a 5min frequency, others are every ~10min or so, with some segments having 2-3 lines on it. I've seen them get backed up before an intersection, and open doors for passengers before they even reach the stop haha. I've personally hood-surfed over cars that got into the lane between the streetcar and the stop quite a few times, and sometimes it really isn't their fault.
The signal on the rear-end [1] is awful. There's a blurb saying "DO NOT PASS OPEN DOORS" which is clear enough, but there's also a sign that illuminates when the doors are open and it's NOT a stop sign. It's this do-not slashed circle with a picture of a stick figure seemingly walking into traffic. I think there's a reading of that symbol from well-meaning tourists that says "Attention boarding passengers, don't run into traffic". I could see that freaking out a waymo without a little bit of custom code.
[0] (All red lines are streetcars) https://cdn.ttc.ca/-/media/Project/TTC/DevProto/Images/Home/...
[1] https://blogto-production2-baselayer-display.blogto.com/arti...
flutas 2 hours ago
https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/waymo-issue-voluntary-software-...
mech4bg 35 minutes ago
Waterluvian 2 hours ago
harmmonica 2 hours ago
I have zero insight into their pricing mechanism, but I was getting in the car coming back from, no exaggeration, one of the most expensive cities on the planet and so if I was Waymo I would probably price that ride pretty aggressively based on the location alone. Then you throw in all the other data points Google has about its users and I had my first "fuck me" moment where dynamic pricing really slapped me in the face (I've seen it firsthand with the airlines but Waymo is particularly insidious because of the use of my Google history).
And of course I'm aware Waymo has to price high while they're fleet-constrained or folks are going to be waiting forever for a car, but I hope they don't get too content with the absurd margin at $10+/mile. They will be tempted to do just that and so instead of flooding the market with fleet decide they'll put just enough cars in service to maximize profit instead of going for market share (of all riders I mean). But I fear that's exactly what's going to happen until there's credible competition.
ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
On Wednesday afternoon, before school dismissal, a cross-town, 50-minute epic ride cost me $33.39. But it also cost nearly $25 to go 2 miles on that same evening.
Upon introduction here in Phoenix, Waymo had a promotion called "GoPass" which you'd purchase for $10 and it lasted for 30 days. It would give an across-the-board 10% discount on every ride, and 5 free cancellations. It was a great deal if you were a heavy user. A few months ago, they killed that off and replaced it with "Waymo Premier" which is a $29.99 monthly subscription (auto-renews) with no discount. Instead, you earn Waymo Cash at a base rate of 10%, and you get those 5 free cancellations, and you also get priority pickup. That means, if you're not paying for Premier, you cannot get priority pickup, and you may wait a lot longer, depending on demand.
I'm still saving money with Premier, but sometimes the cost is outrageous. Especially considering that I'm qualified for disabled transport in the region, and they've got a new matching app that will let me get a Lyft or Uber for $3 flat fee, no tipping.
tomComb 2 hours ago
Exactly. We could talk about the billions that Waymo has invested in developing this technology, and how much people really do like it, or how safe it is, but at the end of the day the only thing that will give us the reduced prices that this tech could deliver, is competition.
And that's how it should be.
(But they will always have to charge a bit more for this service due to the political sensitivities that require them to load up on local partners who will require a slice.)
lapkaaaa 8 hours ago
shevy-java 7 hours ago
lapkaaaa 7 hours ago
jen20 7 hours ago
whycombilater 2 hours ago
Waterluvian an hour ago
whycombilater an hour ago
rsanek an hour ago
mlh496 2 hours ago
Ericson2314 2 hours ago
sheepscreek 7 hours ago
Bubble1296 7 hours ago
ChrisMarshallNY 7 hours ago
mjr00 7 hours ago
jt2190 7 hours ago
For a press release from a private company operating in Ontario there is no legal requirement to publish in both languages. Some companies might do so anyway if they have operations that are regulated by the federal government and/or they just want the goodwill.
Imported products have to meet Federal packaging laws, which do require both languages.
ipaddr 6 hours ago
senderista 7 hours ago
sandworm101 7 hours ago
There was also controversy over proper names v. descriptions. "Macdonalds" is a proper name but should "Burger King" be translated to "Burger Roi"?
mjr00 7 hours ago
In general this is untrue outside of Quebec (and maybe Ontario). I'm in Vancouver and while there's some federally mandated bilingual text, the French-speaking population here is extremely low and day-to-day everything is English-only. Even local public sector things like announcements on the train. You're more likely to see signs in Mandarin than French.
nickspacek 7 hours ago
julianlam 5 hours ago
However that might be because I am an anglophone from Ontario and my mind filters out the French language on signs if an English equivalent is present.
LawnGnome an hour ago
semiquaver 7 hours ago
philistine 6 hours ago
semiquaver 7 hours ago
giarc 6 hours ago
Includes St Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburg, Minneapolis etc.
quickthrowman 6 hours ago
trizoza 8 hours ago
smallpipe 7 hours ago
kypro 7 hours ago
You can walk or cycle... Modern bikes are light and pretty fast too.
We need regulation to ensure they don't come here.
mech4bg 7 hours ago
wetwater 5 hours ago
IMO legislating for them is legislating against humans , their jobs, their families .
bb123 24 minutes ago
superkuh 3 hours ago
reportingsjr 2 hours ago
hattar 2 hours ago
No argument or anything here, just saying what I think is an interesting nuance as someone who has spent a lot of life driving in snowy places.
I’m in Denver now and it’ll be really interesting to see how these things handle the effects of a real storm. If I had to make a guess it would be that they’ll all just stop driving for a day or two.
superkuh 2 hours ago
voidmain0001 8 hours ago
suddenlybananas 8 hours ago
throw__away7391 8 hours ago
Fricken 7 hours ago
scosman 8 hours ago
both!
BeaverGoose 7 hours ago
whynotmaybe 8 hours ago
lapkaaaa 7 hours ago
preommr 7 hours ago
Ford is already removing bike lanes.
Tax dollars to put in bike lanes, and then tax dollars to remove them.
creaturemachine 6 hours ago
tensor 40 minutes ago
blululu 7 hours ago
throwayay58373 6 hours ago
ipaddr 6 hours ago
hncbw02z5a 8 hours ago
lapkaaaa 8 hours ago
mdurana 7 hours ago
spollo 7 hours ago
When snowing in Toronto you usually cannot see the painted lines on the road, there's just the lines from cars driving through the snow that you follow. Sometimes two lane roads become an unofficial one lane road depending on what feels safe.
The falling snow also bounces the laser pulses(?) back at the lidar. Snow fall can be pretty heavy and make it difficult to see objects far ahead. Not sure how well their handling of rain ports over to snow, but it will be interesting to see!
lapkaaaa 7 hours ago
Rohansi 7 hours ago
jhonof 7 hours ago
SoftTalker 6 hours ago
boplicity 6 hours ago
shagie 6 hours ago
https://path.berkeley.edu/automation/development-advanced-ro...
It had hands free operation (still needed someone in the seat to control the plow) and lane assist in whiteout conditions when the outside edge of the lane had a cliff (much worse than driving into the ditch).
https://path.berkeley.edu/automation/development-advanced-ro...
> This project is one of the first real-world applications derived from PATH/Caltrans research in the area of automated vehicle control. A modified snowblower with add-on sensors, actuator, computer and driver interfaces was developed, and initial field tests were conducted along the 8 guardrail sections between Kingvale and Soda Springs on the shoulders of Interstate-80 near Donner Summit.
https://path.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/develop...
> Various lateral sensing and referencing technologies were investigated for this application; what was found was that machine vision does not penetrate snow, and that the GPS system does not provide sufficient reliability under possible multipath and blockage scenarios. A magnetic-marker-based sensing system was chosen for the initial implementation primarily because of its high reliability and accuracy (better than 1 cm) under all weather conditions. The mountainous highway I-80 near Donner Summit (close to Lake Tahoe) was chosen to be the first field test site. In 2001, magnets were installed along the eastbound and westbound guardrails of I-80, at 4 feet apart and 4 feet away from the guardrail. Binary coding of the magnetic markers was designed (north pole up vs. south pole up) to provide information about guardrail characteristics, such as the shoulder side (right or left of the blower) and the end of guardrail. Eight sections of the guardrail were equipped with magnets for the initial feasibility operations with a total length of 1.46 km (0.9 mile) between Soda Springs and Kingvale.
scosman 7 hours ago
parthdesai 7 hours ago
coldpie 7 hours ago
jscott817 7 hours ago
fidotron 7 hours ago
lapkaaaa 7 hours ago
fidotron 7 hours ago
Lidar is cool when you want to get a point cloud from a fixed location, or dealing with perfectly uniform surfaces (which cars don't because humans can't do this either), but beyond that there are better ways to do things.
ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
“Why, thank you, Camera! You are doing a wonderful job of seeing everything in your FOV!”
“Ahh, you are very flattering, LIDAR! It’s an endearing quality in you, for sure!”
LIDAR: blushes
Fricken 7 hours ago
Rohansi 7 hours ago
triceratops 7 hours ago
Not always. Definitely not all freeways.
> And every car has its own lights for seeing where you are driving
Not always far enough. Especially at freeway speeds on unlit freeways.
fidotron 7 hours ago
If humans don't have lidar but can drive it's an existence proof of the viability of that approach.
bryanlarsen 6 hours ago
triceratops 6 hours ago
Lidar is superhuman vision.
Rohansi 6 hours ago
The real answer is very simple: safe drivers slow down to adapt to poor conditions (including visibility). Lidar might reduce how much it needs to slow down but I don't think it will be eliminated because you can't drive with only lidar.
triceratops 5 hours ago
I smell smoke before I see it. Useful if there's a forest fire up ahead.
Burning rubber or smoke from the engine is an indicator of a mechanical issue.
> you can't drive with only lidar.
Nobody said you could. This is a strawman.
Tesla stans are the only ones trying to convince everyone you can only drive with cameras. Everyone else is pretty united on the usefulness of multiple inputs.
Rohansi 4 hours ago
Didn't mean it in that way. I meant a car with camera+lidar would realistically still slow down because of the reduced camera visibility.
> Tesla stans are the only ones trying to convince everyone you can only drive with cameras. Everyone else is pretty united on the usefulness of multiple inputs.
Ignore them. The latest Model S and X have radar again, but possibly unused right now, so they are probably going to roll that out in a refresh of the 3 and Y eventually.
SoftTalker 6 hours ago
ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
kotaKat 7 hours ago
yorwba 7 hours ago
Bubble1296 7 hours ago
diskzero 7 hours ago
shagie 7 hours ago
1. Fresh unplowed snow where there are no lane markers visible.
2. Significant banks that take up half a lane with two lanes in each direction.
3. Ice (often one doesn't start going through an intersection on a green until you're 100% sure that every car has cleared - I've been on both sides of this, where you don't go because there's a car sliding through, and the car sliding through because slick ice doesn't care about brakes)
4. Hard braking (the "drive slow and use the brakes lightly for a long while")
5. Cold car things. Electric battery life in the cold (heater for the passengers). Wipers frozen to the windshield. Accumulation of snow on the window. Excess snow on top of the car (considered an insecure load).
---
Tangent for the "how do you handle lanes when you can't see any" ... old school approach: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/833362
> Driving a snowplow during whiteout condition is one such example. In order to improve the safety and efficiency of the snow removal operation, a supplemental steering guidance display was proposed and instrumented in a Caltrans snowplow. The guidance information was calculated based on the magnetic markers embedded under the roadway. Operations were successfully conducted on a 6.25 km freeway over Donner Summit on Interstate 80 in California during the 1998-1999 winter season.
bluefirebrand 2 hours ago
Forget unplowed snow. Often in Calgary where I live there's no lane markers visible under the snow for months at a time, even if it's plowed regularly
jbmchuck 7 hours ago
cmrdporcupine 7 hours ago
I frankly think it's a legit POV, and I'm also local to this, so I'm going to use my own much higher karma to post it again:
https://techfordemocracy.ca/2026/04/29/say-no-to-waymo/
I think there are legitimate concerns in promoting American BigTech as provider of infrastructure/services in Toronto. Concerns about data collection, about technological autonomy, and local employment.
bitpush 5 hours ago
> Digital sovereignty and privacy is at stake.
This is the most strongest argument, and luckily that's the first one. Many ways to solve this so not really a big problem.
> Ontarians’ jobs risk being outsourced
What jobs are being displaced by driverless cars? The best argument here is uber drivers are going to be affected. Who would you rather drive you at 3am if you're a drunk woman? An uber driver or Waymo?
> Public transit could lose riders
What is the goal here? The goal is to move people efficiently and decrease the reliance on human driving, which can cause deaths. Public transportation is vital but again, there are times when subway / buses wont work.
Also, if public transit is a major concern, shouldnt we be asking Uber (see point #2) to go away?
The last two points are super generic, it isnt even worth discussion.
Not convinced with the approach here.
canadiantim 8 hours ago
dyauspitr 8 hours ago
rafram 7 hours ago
shevy-java 7 hours ago
I understand the issue of technical power, mind you, but I don't really see how US companies expanding into Canada is a good idea as long as a hostile orange individual keeps on potty-mouthing Canadians.
papercrane 7 hours ago
bubbluppugus 7 hours ago
"I will show that America first President who wants to fracture global trade...by arguing for fracturing global trade."
That gen pops tune changed with the political climate just like big corp previously going on about left wing shit is stunning
Ya'll are just LARPing what you watch on TV and read online
calgoo 6 hours ago
bubbluppugus 6 hours ago
They’re encouraging their leaders to route around 300 million Muricans as they see no collective action in response to threats to global trade they rely on.
And argue ok if US institutions and zeitgeist are "fuck yall we're America" well again 300 million are really at the whim of 8 billion.
Not sure the typical Mr Rogers naive optimism "we're America!" is gonna get the US through after 10 years of this (Biden admin effort was binned just months after Trump 2.0 took off so it effectively didn't matter; Jimmy Carter 2.0). That's just copium, blind faith in what Adam Smith called "the invisible hand" he later came to realize was a mistake to believe existed
Rohansi 7 hours ago
dennis_jeeves2 7 hours ago
Orange guy may make news, but Canada has greater problems from within.
127-1298 7 hours ago