Stolen Renoir paintings found hidden, and damaged, behind cinder block wall (cbsnews.com)
john_strinlai 7 hours ago
tonyedgecombe 7 hours ago
SoftTalker 6 hours ago
goodcanadian 6 hours ago
thaumasiotes 3 hours ago
It opens with a guy who's complaining to the police about the frequent robbery of his house. They view him as a nuisance and try to respond to his complaints as little as possible.
Eventually someone is apprehended committing a different crime in a different location. An officer visits him in the hospital (there was a mighty struggle before he was caught) and asks if he'd be willing to lower his sentence by potentially resolving some other outstanding crimes that the police are investigating.
She reads off a list of crimes, and he responds "yeah, that was me" to everything she says. One of the items is the several robberies of the guy we met earlier.
It's win-win; his sentence is lowered for doing the police a favor, and the police report a higher solve rate.
After that, the original guy who was always brushed off suffers another robbery. Since he happens to be home at the time of the latest one, he is severely beaten.
DASD 6 hours ago
akudha 4 hours ago
I wonder what victims have gotta say about that...
dofm 3 hours ago
You only let them say anything every four years or so. And then you set aside their complaints by saying some of them are made up.
dh2022 6 hours ago
xp84 5 hours ago
dofm 6 hours ago
“Thought you were going up in the world, did you Salvo? Oh no, no Armand Guillaumin for you. The boss ain’t pleased and he wants you to know about it. One more screwup and you’ll end up with a face like that”
john_strinlai 6 hours ago
dofm 6 hours ago
jerf 6 hours ago
dofm 5 hours ago
But this is a painting of his own young son, Jean (who went on to be a legendary director, screenwriter, actor).
So one presumes there's a method in it, because nobody hates a kid that much.
mosselman 4 hours ago
dofm 3 hours ago
john_strinlai 6 hours ago
sherr 4 hours ago
dofm 3 hours ago
But also yes. When he was not doing paintings with lots of faces or naked ladies he was on slightly more solid ground.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paintings_by_Pierre-Au...
https://lastmuseum.com/artist/auguste-renoir
e.g. I like the Alfred Sisley painting and the more realist painting of his father, and Madame Clementine Valensi Stora which he apparently repudiated.
But I don't think he ever painted a truly good female nude, and some are just utterly reductive (as a photography nerd I find Torso Effect of Sunlight to be the most interesting but the face oh the face)
Loads of it is really rather Monkey Christ, on reflection, and after about 1905 nothing is great.
So I do sympathise with the joke.
pvaldes 22 minutes ago
Also those were artists deliberately breaking the rigid rules of realist classicism and finding inspiration on Asian art. Renoir was criticized by its figures "with skin and clothes obscenely stained with what seems dirty greasy oil spots" but the big point was to trigger controversy and to flip the bird to the classicism of the "real" professional artists.
Cpoll 6 hours ago
dennyabraham 6 hours ago
[1] https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2015/07/01/experts-identify-...
jongjong an hour ago
I don't understand why anyone would want to buy something outside of its legal socio-economic context, when that thing's entire value is derived from that context and is otherwise worth very little intrinsically based purely on aesthetic value.
Any market value it sells for is then based on some shared mental deficiency which prevents people from understanding that.
AnimalMuppet 40 minutes ago
And, a thing's economic value is derived from what someone else will pay for it, and only that. If someone else (or several someones) will buy it, whether or not the law agrees that it's legal, then the thing is valuable. (See drugs for an example.)
I wouldn't say that such people have a mental deficiency. A moral deficiency, yes, absolutely, but not a mental one.
embedding-shape 6 hours ago
Right, but what about your local brick dealer who has 10-50K to waste on whatever? Definitely way more common and easier than you think to unload these sort of things, once you go down in price a lot because of the circumstances.
ericmay 6 hours ago
Notice how things aren’t being stolen at this magnitude in China? Japan? If we’re Russian or Iranian for example I think this would be a great strategy if you view yourself at a civilizational war. Most of Europe is still asleep or in denial.
gvfsa 6 hours ago
xp84 5 hours ago
sitkack 4 hours ago
mac3n 2 hours ago
ericmay 5 hours ago
BonerWiener 4 hours ago
Stealing from a Chinese museum would be extremely difficult. Cameras and security staff monitor exhibits during the day, and even after hours, extensive surveillance everywhere, makes it hard to get away unnoticed. The risk is simply too high
ericmay 4 hours ago
pelagicAustral 6 hours ago
slop 2 hours ago
Aurornis 5 hours ago
You only need one.
With something like this I imagine you could hold on to it for years or even a lifetime waiting for the right connection to come along. Maybe some of them are even commissioned or pre-sold.
I can’t say I know anyone with stolen art, but over my lifetime I’ve known people across a range of wealth classes who got a thrill out of acquiring and owning something that was risky contraband.
tough 5 hours ago
jimnotgym 4 hours ago
timcobb 4 hours ago
autoexec 3 hours ago
YVoyiatzis 5 hours ago
sandworm101 5 hours ago
https://documenti.camera.it/leg18/dossier/testi/gi0031b.htm
"is committed by the person who has collaborated in identifying the co-conspirators or has ensured evidence of the crime or has effectively worked to prevent the criminal activity from being carried to further consequences or has recovered or had recovered the cultural property subject to the crime (penalty reduced from one third to two thirds)."
dewey 4 hours ago
slop 2 hours ago
gwbas1c 2 hours ago
1: The stolen art sits around for a LONG TIME.
2: The provenance (papers) is forged
3: The buyer usually doesn't look too closely. They're either willing to fool themselves, gullible, or otherwise should know better.
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-case-of-the-4-million-g...
john_strinlai 10 minutes ago
blobdole 5 hours ago
Humans are always the hole in the security you build, no matter how good the wall is.
glouwbug 5 hours ago
dofm 7 hours ago
Missed opportunity IMO. It was where it belongs.
You know how Anthropic has banned being cruel to its models? I wonder if the definition includes asking it to generate images in the style of Renoir…
https://www.instagram.com/renoir_sucks_at_painting/
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/art-bites-renoir-sucks-mov...
(ETA: Flagged, haha really? Come on. It’s a well-known running joke.)
ericmay 6 hours ago
dofm 6 hours ago
(It’s a joke. Like Birds Aren’t Real)
ericmay 6 hours ago
matkoniecz 5 hours ago
are you serious and it is your actual position or is it also a joke?
ericmay 5 hours ago
ks2048 5 hours ago
ericmay 5 hours ago
SantalBlush an hour ago
mosselman 4 hours ago
I guess they were going to share the one PC.
moffkalast 4 hours ago
Insimwytim 5 hours ago
jacquesm 4 hours ago