Apple HomeView (apple.com)

605 pointsby etothet9 hours ago742 comments

schmichael 7 hours ago

The weird thing about this product is that its biggest competitor is "an old ipad." I feel like most of their target customer base already has an old ipad that's better suited for what this does in every way. Old ipads:

1. Have a battery so you're not tied to a cord. Even old poor batteries are better than no battery.

2. Have apps! How does this not support apps?!

3. Have a huge range of 3rd party products and hacks and 3D models to wall mount it or stands for it

4. Are kitchen-safe (splatter proof, far fewer holes than this product, movable out of the way)

5. Also support siri and facetime and everything this device does AFAICT

I'm guessing they realized this and made sure it's priced lower than the cheapest new iPad, but it will be interesting to see if the price difference can compete with the old iPads most of their customers have in drawers or already on walls.

Maybe the purpose-built nature will be a reasonable enough differentiator, but I'm not sure it's focused enough for that. It's both a passive information station and for calls? It's for recipes which implies you put it in the kitchen, but it looks like a nightmare to clean with all those holes? It's also a very small screen when you have to read the recipe from a distance because it has no battery. I can't move my stove to it, and I definitely don't want it too near a stove or sink!

The multiple users feature is a really neat trick, but I would kill to have this for all Apple devices. Let me hand my kid my phone and it automatically switches to kid mode!

Please Apple don't lock multiple users to stationary devices like HomeView!

mxie-ca 6 hours ago

Yes, it's the family iPad that I would love to have for years!

kfarr 6 hours ago

I was going to say the same thing -- we already solve all these use cases in our household now with an old iPad and there is nothing wrong with it.

amelius 6 hours ago

At least my old iPad turns off and consumes zero energy when off.

With this thing ... it remains to be seen what happens in practice.

danudey 6 hours ago

Given that even an AppleTV uses less power at maximum usage than an XBox does when it's asleep, I feel as though the power usage is not going to be too much of an issue.

amelius 6 hours ago

That says more about XBox than about Apple.

asadm 4 hours ago

it also says more about what's accepted by general audience.

jdminhbg 6 hours ago

Old iPads are better than this in every way except for the way that matters most in a shared family device, then? I'd love for Apple to add multi-user support to iPadOS and think it's way past time they did, but it's not going to be a simple software update. This device has on-chip support for multiple FaceID accounts so it can distinguish them securely.

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

Multi-user "Handoff" seems interesting as well. The implications from a lot of the descriptions is that this HomeView is designed from the perspective that every user also has a primary iPhone or iPad and HomeView coordinates data sync across a number of apps from that primary device. (Several features mention that they only work with that user's iPhone or iPad on the same Wifi network.)

wlesieutre 6 hours ago

Apple has multi user support for iPads, but only if you’re a school.

Normal users should accept that if they let their kid play Angry Birds they’re risking an accident with all their other apps getting mucked with, and if they don’t like it they can buy five iPads.

https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/shared-ipad-overv...

quibono 6 hours ago

Is this sarcasm or are you one of _those_ Apple fans willing to rationalise every single issue their products have?

redundantly 5 hours ago

I'd say it's sardonic, rather than sarcastic.

arthurcolle 3 hours ago

I think they also do this for prison iPads as well!

sillysaurusx 3 hours ago

What do prison iPads do in general?

nuxi 3 hours ago

Run the services in jails /s

derefr 3 hours ago

I believe the idiomatic solution for “handing your child an iDevice but only letting them touch one app” is Guided Access mode.

It’s only when you want to let them jump in and out of multiple apps (e.g. pick what game they want to play on their own) that you start having a problem.

(And the not-idiomatic-but-people-do-it-anyway solution for that, from what I’ve seen, is buying one extra iPad, and creating a special whole-family Apple account for it, to effectively serve as a game console for the kids.)

paul7986 4 hours ago

Agree this should just be a dock/charger for iPads.

Though the sheer fact that in 2026 it's driven by Siri who is not a conversationalist AI, but still the same frustrating voice technology from 2011 is confusing they would even bother releasing this.

Sooner or later their lack of innovating themselves and just copying is going to make them what the Blackberry was when iPhone was released.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

That’s not true anymore.

paul7986 2 hours ago

You can have a complete conversation with Siri back and forth like you can with chatGPT without having to constantly say Hey Siri?

I use conversational voice AI while driving and with the new Siri i constantly have to use hey siri to keep the conversation going.

kemayo 2 hours ago

> Though the sheer fact that in 2026 it's driven by Siri who is not a conversationalist AI, but still the same frustrating voice technology from 2011 is confusing they would even bother releasing this.

This is no longer the case. Siri as of iOS 27 is a gemini-based LLM system. It has a chatbot app and everything.

paul7986 2 hours ago

Really? On my iPhone 15 Pro Max (older iphone) each time i want to have a complete conversation with it I have to constantly prompt it with Hey Siri then say next thing in conversation. Is that your experience?

I use and have used chatGPT voice while driving for awhile ... here's a very silly example https://www.instagram.com/p/DecaL9Gx6li/ . Besides that silly example im in school now and give chatGPT all my notes to create interact multiple choice questions i take while driving. Overall love hearing how other people are using chatGPT voice and or any other AI voice conversationalist tech.

Miraste 6 hours ago

A lot of those cons are advantages for at least one target market, the elderly. It's much better for them if the device can't move and can't install new software.

schmichael 6 hours ago

Fair but I also know plenty of people who give their elderly folks their old iPads. If you fit all the important apps on the home screen and tweak a couple things, I can't imagine the UX could be any more complex than for this device. Mobility and screen size is even more important for the elderly. They don't want to stand in their kitchen staring down at a little computer to talk to their grandchild on a tiny screen.

And finally, when they do have issues and ask you questions: now it's questions about an unfamiliar device you may not own yourself!

Old iPad still seems optimal for this demographic.

Miraste 6 hours ago

Screen size is a good point. For the other things, I suppose I was thinking of my own grandparents, who had memory issues and would've benefited from a device that can't be misplaced.

rjrjrjrj 5 hours ago

iPad OS still has a zillion failure modes for the elderly. Long press, split screen and the other multitasking paradigms, multi-finger gestures, touch id, background audio from some tab in Safari... there's just no end of features that can throw them off. And it isn't multi-user.

Not sure if HomeView is the answer, but some aspects of the video were interesting. eg super-fast user switching with no explicit login; and how it puts Siri forward as the primary UI in a way that the iPad doesn't, even if the iPad technically has the same capabilities.

That they drilled a hole through the kitchen island table top for the power cord was hilarious. Exactly zero people in the real world are going to do that.

smikhanov 4 hours ago

    Exactly zero people
You are wrong! I was redoing my kitchen recently and there’s a huge variety of accessories that kitchen worktop suppliers offer that have to do with using electronics on a worktop. A round hole with a lid to thread the power cable through is a very common thing that kitchen planner software includes nowadays, especially for kitchen islands. You can even have a completely flush wireless charging pad on your kitchen worktop if you want.

slashdave 5 hours ago

Yup. And a real market: "hip" kids buying such a device for their parents.

Telemakhos 5 hours ago

Every 65+ person I know has one of those alexa-speaker things. Nobody I know under 65 has one. I wonder if there's just some generational expectation for a fixed household object, like phones and televisions were for people in the twentieth century.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

Funny. I had those for years and years (very early adoption), and have since gotten rid of them.

deinonychus 3 hours ago

we all bought those for our parents, or just as likely, gave them to our parents after we were done with them

ssl-3 2 hours ago

I still have them. I use them for kitchen timers, alarm clocks, a quick weather forecast, random maths and unit conversions, and whatever I want to activate with Home Assistant. There's one on the night stand with a clock on the front that I never need to set, that adjusts its brightness automatically based on ambient light, and which gets used as a Bluetooth speaker for the tablet that I watch dumb shit on YouTube with sometimes.

So, like: The light switch in the garage is very inconveniently-located, and it's dark AF in there both at night and when I walk in from a bright sunny day. The lights can be activated by voice and that's pretty nice to have.

They're also good when I want background music that's actually-in-the-background: I've got some very nice audio systems for when I want focus on listening to music, but they are much more successful at being involving than at being being ignored. The kinda-meh-sounding Alexa-type widget on the table over there does a better job for background noise.

I'm not anywhere near 60 yet. I just find that stuff like this is useful.

(Yeah, yeah. I could build or buy voice-controlled speaker-widgets that integrate with Home Assistant in an open-source way, and even use them with a local LLM if I wanted to. I'm disinterested in that kind of effort at this time.)

TheOtherHobbes 3 hours ago

The screen is too small for the elderly. You're not going to get much information on there if you have to show large text, assuming that's even possible.

I think the idea is in the ballpark but the form factor is not ideal. The screen should be much bigger so notes can be left for others - maybe from scribbles rather than voice - and calendars and shopping lists can be seen from across the room.

This looks like someone at Apple took a recent Alexa and said "We should do one of those" instead of something more adventurous.

Johnny555 2 hours ago

That depends on what they want to use it for, but we got an Echo Show 8 for my elderly mother in law years ago for video conferencing and she loves it. Other than video conferencing she mostly uses for voice tasks like checking the weather, setting a timer or playing music so the screen doesn't need to display any text.

If not for the need for video conferencing, she'd have been fine with an audio only device.

makeitdouble 6 hours ago

An issue with old iPads is getting OS updates.

The last base iPad still supported on the current OS must be the 2020 version. There was a blip in the corona years, but since the iPad sales have been declining, so the amount of devices still up to date aren't that many.

cube00 6 hours ago

> An issue with old iPads is getting OS updates.

I'd have the same concern with this device given Apple haven't committed to longer then usual support.

At least I already got my money's worth from the old iPad and being able to give it a new role on the kitchen bench was a bonus.

Zigurd 4 hours ago

O the irony if the Google Home running Fuchsia OS and Flutter apps is supported longer.

zacharyz 6 hours ago

The biggest addition is multiple users supported on a single device - something ipads should have had a while ago.

fusslo 5 hours ago

I'm hoping that not having apps is a feature

Maybe companies will lean into making the most of whats possible within the apple ecosystem and leave the rest out

j45 6 hours ago

Don’t want apps for kids to find their ways into.

Lots of parents want to manage it

This is a new device like a home phone.

Kids can securely call who they are allowed to from a fixed location, not wandering off with a device.

This looks like a modern Google Home Screen, likely matching the market when it seems obvious.

Edit: Typos.

throwaway-blaze 4 hours ago

The average age for first phone in the US at least is now around 8.5yrs. The kids who are capable of independently deciding to call a friend or grandma already likely have a phone.

This device screams "we came up with use cases in a conference room committee meeting" not "we're solving one problem everyone has in a new way".

j45 3 hours ago

First phone is very different than first touch/smart phone. Some folks just get away with a smartwatch with eSIM.

The device looks like an ipad merged with a homepod. It's not definitive, but the idea of mounting an ipad on a homepod does seem to exist in the 3D Printing world [1].

The negative effects of screen time on children's brain develop is being more and more intensely researched, and I suspect an adjustment is underway. Low-fi (LCD screens), etc can make a lot of sense.

[1] https://makerworld.com/en/models/811172-ipad-stand-retro-ima...

slashdave 5 hours ago

Yeah, most people cannot be bothered with (3) honestly

8ytecoder 5 hours ago

Isn’t there a safety hazard with battery swelling and such if it’s always connected to power? May be I have outdated information I unmounted the iPad after reading about it.

CodeWriter23 5 hours ago

* Wired power required.

8ytecoder 5 hours ago

I’m replying to a comment about the iPad.

tyre 5 hours ago

It's like a smart thermostat, always plugged in.

(Not exactly the same power feed but you know what I mean)

ryandetzel 5 hours ago

That's old information, modern devices have better battery management

dlubarov 4 hours ago

Limiting charging below 100% (which many tablets now support) helps, but the battery is still likely to be the component that fails before anything else.

ssl-3 2 hours ago

That can be an issue with a device that is always plugged in. Or with a device that is always unplugged, resting in a drawer somewhere. Or with a device that gets used with normal charge and discharge cycles. Or with things that are carefully-managed. tl;dr, it can be an issue.

I'm still waiting for the 9.7" iPad Pro that I have to swell up. I got it used, but AFAICT the battery is 10 years old at this point. It has definitely been plugged in ~24/7 since I got it.

Sometimes, I notice that has decided it's time to discharge itself somewhat and then recharge again. I assume this is for BMS calibration or battery health or both; I just let it do its thing and it's been fine.

Meanwhile: A disused Samsung Galaxy S7's battery swelled up enough to split the case open while I had it sitting on a shelf, switched off. It was about 6 years old at that point, and I was careful to leave it at about a 60% SoC when I put it on that shelf.

I haven't had the battery well up in phone that sees daily use -- yet. I won't be surprised if/when it happens.

elpakal 5 hours ago

I have an old alexa and a paper calendar we literally write on for our family stuff. And the wall ends up getting written on.

So this is two birds for me

xyst 5 hours ago

I highly suspect this product will be tombstoned at around the same time as the VR goggles.

It’s really out of touch. I don’t see any benefit over any old tablet.

criddell 3 hours ago

To me, it looks like the HomeView with the stand has better speakers than any iPad and the microphones should be better as well.

Digory 5 hours ago

Exactly. I won't buy this, but I might buy "magsafe on a chrome arm, with a bluetooth speaker" from AliExpress in a few weeks.

jdprgm 5 hours ago

It's a niche product and pretty cheap. Of course you can do everything and more on an ipad but I see this as basically a competitor to Alexa that sits on a kitchen counter and is occasionally useful. In that scenario never thinking about a battery is an advantage. I imagine you might leave this unlocked all the time and it is closer to a hands free device which is useful while cooking. The splatter thing is really only an issue if you place it like right next to your stovetop or sink. Even one foot away on a counter pretty much eliminates that issue.

It doesn't have to do a lot to be useful. If there are even a couple consistent daily use cases I can see this making sense for some people. Even if just means I don't need to go grab my iPad/iPhone from the couch to set a timer or ask a quick question.

halJordan 4 hours ago

Definitely not pretty cheap. We need to stop normalizing high prices just because we happen to be in the upper part of the k economy. It's an entire week's pay at minimum wage. To have a screen with a camera and speaker on a weighted base.

jdprgm 4 hours ago

For an apple product this is extremely cheap. The only non accessory products that are cheaper are watch SE and airpods.

Outside of basically just TV's the economy has decided to completely abandon targeting really much of anything at below median wage incomes.

halJordan 4 hours ago

It's not extremely cheap for an Apple product. It's the same price as all of their accessories. It's similar in price to the cheap phones they sell. Why are you trying to convince yourself this is cheap?

drewbeck 3 hours ago

One, this isn't an accessory like a keyboard or a watch strap. Two, the cheapest iPhone on apple.com right now is $799. This device sells for $299.

The-Bus 4 hours ago

I did a very quick search for "kitchen smart hub" and a lot of the devices (including some by Amazon) were in the same price range. Even the Meta Portals were $199 to $349 when released.

Google's Nest Home is only $99, so that is likely the cheapest version from a big company.

j45 5 hours ago

For the parents that are engaged with trying to solve a problem like this, it's not solved by an old iPad, because old enough iPads often can't run current apps.

I'm not sure if this is a kitchen device, maybe an edge of the kitchen device, where a desk or landline cordless phone used to be in some homes.

Apple moving into home is one thing, also people being uncertain about apple releasing new product categories is also not new.

Personally it feels like some of the features in this have been researched with the audience who will buy it (homeowners, parents, kids, etc) which are shown in the imaging as well. This can seem a little off because Apple is usually creating something for everyone and not just some.

The main thing about the screen being on a stand is a child can't be too tempted to walk aroudn with it, or touch it (guided access aside).

boilerupnc 3 hours ago

> it's not solved by an old iPad, because old enough iPads often can't run current apps

While I understand the sentiment, with all of the cloning using AI - it’s far more achievable to now back port an apps behavior to an older iOS version than ever before. I did this very thing for a WiFi fan app that didn’t provide an app which works on an older iOS. So I captured the API calls, grabbed some screen captures and within a few hours had a swift native app that looked and operated well enough on my old iPhone/ipad. Felt good to put some this drawer hardware back into use within the house.

j45 3 hours ago

That's a super fair point.

I saw a post here a few weeks ago aout someone publishing a daily "newsletter" for their family of everyone's happenings and going ons.

I believe they were outputting a PDF, and my thought kind of went where yours did.

The PDF is pixels oriented for paper.. or a screen.

One way I see output is a screen is.. a screen, and there's many ways to make the pixels arrange as desired.

The thing I'd kind of still hold off on is this approach isn't for the many, which I believe Apple HomeView is. I could see sending one on a trop with kids, or putting it at family members houses just as a communicator.

Lots of ways to do it again, but it's not about that for most people. There's a reason apple sells so much, they look for creating beginners in the most approachable way possible. It's not the only, best, or exclusive way to do something, but they have an audience they serve.

Gareth321 5 hours ago

Yeah all this device proves is they can easily enable user profiles on iPads and iPhones but they choose not to because fuck you give us more money.

cr1895 4 hours ago

>this device proves they can easily enable user profiles on iPads and iPhones

At the risk of echoing the infamous Dropbox comment...was that ever really considered a technical challenge?

torginus 4 hours ago

It's really common to see integrated iPads in all sort of kiosk/control panel applications. Afaik iPad has a dedicated kiosk mode which doesn't allow you to exit the running app. Android tablets too.

Freedom2 3 hours ago

What's the infamous Dropbox comment?

a10c 3 hours ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224

Gareth321 3 hours ago

That is fascinating and funny! There is always a Linux guy ready to explain why UX/UI doesn't matter because they can technically solve the problem in 17 complicated steps.

matheusmoreira 2 hours ago

Here's a different perspective.

https://zedshaw.com/blog/2018-03-25-the-billionaires-vs-bran...

Gareth321 2 hours ago

What a bitter and unhinged post. To characterise Drew's obvious joke as "retribution" is farcical.

lukevp 35 minutes ago

Zed Shaw isn’t especially known for even-keeled rhetoric. He got famous from “rails is a ghetto”.

gaudystead 3 hours ago

Thank you for asking, and thank you to the two people who responded to you (within a minute of each other!). I was unaware of this "infamous" comment, but it's interesting to see how it's aged over the past 19 years. Times sure have changed.

ZoneZealot 3 hours ago

iPadOS specifically supports multiple users, including partitioning the total available disk space and sharing a slice to each of the accounts. Only possible for devices added in Apple Business Manager and managed in a supervised state with an MDM solution under Apple Device Enrollment (ADE) with a 'shared iPad' enrollment profile. You can even integrate Entra ID (Microsoft 365) for handling the login process on shared iPads, or use federated Managed Apple Accounts.

It's not intended for home users of course, because that could jeopardise sales in families.

baxtr 4 hours ago

An iPhone is actually also just a small iPad which happens to have a SIM card slot!

riffic 4 hours ago

didn't the first ipads have SIM slots

criddell 3 hours ago

The newest iPads do too. For some reason they have never added one to the Macbook which seems nuts.

throwaway894345 4 hours ago

I think the main thing that this does better than an ipad is voice control. Maybe you can buy an iPad dock with a speaker and a good microphone that would obviate this concern (happy to take correction if so), but if you're in the kitchen it's often nice to be able to ask it to play music or if carrots are safe for dogs to eat or whatever. It's nice not to have to use your hands when they are covered in chicken juice or whathaveyou.

dubeye 4 hours ago

It's very obvious which comments are from those without kids and a busy kitchen. This hardware is built to sell apple family one subs. The multiuser is not a feature of the iPad, and this alone means an iPad can't replicate this.

As you get older you start to realise half of hot takes are a result of living in a different half of the economy which doesn't quite get things like the suburbs are appealing

TeMPOraL 3 hours ago

As a busy person with kids and a kitchen that's always full of some "work in progress", I don't get the appeal of suburbs. Or SUVs. But that's probably because suburbanites driving with kids in their SUVs are a huge nuisance in the city proper.

jclardy 3 hours ago

I think the real issue is that this is "competing" with 7 year old Google Home and Alexa show devices. Devices that were $50 for a lot of their useful life (Now they have of course, become more expensive, and worse.)

Basically, people use them for photos, kitchen timers, quick recipe lookups, quick questions, and "can a dog eat the thing I just dropped".

cableshaft 3 hours ago

> Basically, people use them for photos, kitchen timers, quick recipe lookups, quick questions, and "can a dog eat the thing I just dropped".

Accurate. I ask about the dog eating thing at least once a month. Most recently it was cilantro and tomatoes.

Perepiska 3 hours ago

Good idea for Apple to made old iPads unusable :)

BurritoAlPastor 3 hours ago

I can’t believe nobody’s brought this up yet, but the HomeView fundementally exists for one reason: to be a Matter hub for smarthome stuff. No iPad – or any portable Apple device - can be configured as a home hub for managing Matter-protocol devices. There’s no significant advantage to a HomeView over an iPad if you don’t have any Matter devices.

That’s why this device has multi-user support: you’re only supposed to have one of them, which everyone uses. The Apple TV also has good multi-user support, because Apple doesn’t expect you to connect one Apple TV per user to your television.

turtlebits 3 hours ago

Any portable device as a Matter hub would be pretty useless.

The Apple TV and Homepod mini already support Matter.

ssl-3 2 hours ago

How so? A Matter controller just needs to be powered on and exist somewhere on the [wireless] LAN to do its job.

An old iPad on a stand on the table in the breakfast nook is conceptually fine as a Matter controller until someone picks it up and leaves with it, or unplugs it and lets it run out of battery.

Apple forbids this kind of use because it defiles the majesty of their garden and its walls (or something), but that's just Apple doing Apple things.

t-writescode an hour ago

> How so?

Expectation of usage. An iPad designer assumes it will be taken all around, leave the house, put in a book bag, etc.

While an old iPad being used as an entertainment management surface won’t, that’s not the prime use case intended for iPad.

Apple decided to focus on products whose primary purpose is a stationary device, like a speaker or a TV-attached device. Sure, you can move them place to place, but most won’t.

ssl-3 an hour ago

Right. It's a design limitation, and is not at all a capability limitation.

And the usefulness (or lack thereof) of the functionality can never be tested by real people, because at Apple: Design is everything.

notatoad 2 hours ago

>No iPad – or any portable Apple device - can be configured as a home hub for managing Matter-protocol devices.

hasn't apple been shipping thread radios in devices for a few years now, with no actual use for them? the only thing blocking iPads from being a home hub for managing matter protocol devices is that apple hasn't turned that feature on.

coded_monkey 2 hours ago

iPads used to be able to function as home hubs but they explicitly removed that feature a few years ago and made it Apple TV exclusive .

LoganDark an hour ago

Apple TV and HomePod have supported acting as a relay for years, but IIRC only if you have another Apple device to use the Home app on.

unilynx an hour ago

I haven't had an Apple TV in years.. it has no home app?

LoganDark an hour ago

Ah, apparently you can hold down Home on the remote or use Siri to access smart devices from the TV itself.

mleo an hour ago

It has camera access. Voice for most other things. Without a touchscreen, it would be annoying (to me) to use the remote to move around multiple rooms and devices.

dabinat 3 hours ago

> The multiple users feature is a really neat trick, but I would kill to have this for all Apple devices. Let me hand my kid my phone and it automatically switches to kid mode!

I suspect the reason for this is that it’s not a mobile device and can afford to have the camera always on.

nfw2 3 hours ago

3. Have a huge range of 3rd party products and hacks and 3D models to wall mount it or stands for it

you'd be surprised how much of a barrier this is for average consumer

gdevenyi 3 hours ago

> an old ipad

You've just realized they're going to obsolete all those products.

afavour 2 hours ago

Not quite, surely. It seems to have a pretty solid speaker, which an iPad can't really compare to. I've also struggled to work out how to get an old iPad to work the way my old decrepit Google Home does: digital photo frame until I interact with it, then it resets back to photo frame by itself. There are plenty of iPad photo frame apps but they're not able to automatically reset device state.

Fr0styMatt88 2 hours ago

I’ve been through this thought process many times and I’m not comfortable leaving a device like an iPad permanently connected to AC with a battery that was never designed for that. I can just imagine ending up with a spicy pillow, except now it’s plugged into the wall all the time.

jeffybefffy519 2 hours ago

No Apps is such a strange choice, like really anti consumer....

barkerja an hour ago

I've had a 12" iPad Pro (M1) that I am replacing with the HomeView.

After a couple years of use of trying to use the iPad exactly as you stated here (it's lived 24/7 on my kitchen island, I've realized iPadOS is not that great to use in this way).

I'll be happy to have a "dumbed down" stationary device that serves no purpose but exactly what it's intended for.

That's just me, though; I get why many others may disagree. This is just my experience of actually using it in the way in which I will be replacing it for.

mentalgear 35 minutes ago

what exactly is "your experience" where an iPad isn't enough ?

adjejmxbdjdn an hour ago

The key here is the software and the device look and feel.

Apple could most likely replicate the software on an old iPad. But I think this would still be popular because of its form factor.

fmarasho 7 hours ago

> Secure Exclaves. The A18 chip inside HomeView contains Secure Exclaves that process the camera and microphone feeds in a secure compartment that cannot be accessed by the operating system or by Apple. This enables HomeView to recognize the face and voice of each user without exposing the audio and visual data used for recognition to the operating system.

This is interesting!

cromka 7 hours ago

That's how they say the continuous sound recording works on newest Apple Watch.

Idk, to me it's just one more step in widening of the technological Overton window.

abracadaniel 7 hours ago

I feel like we’re already surrounded by devices that do this without any security whatsoever (TVs for example). So, it’s nice to see one implementation try to do it safely. Though, I do agree that normalizing overt recording could embolden the rest.

cromka 7 hours ago

Well, the devices were doing it in the most hidden way possible. This is plain in the open and that's how that window is moved. And yes, I absolutely believe that the overt recording is the actual moment where they expect us to actually get used to it.

Barbing 6 hours ago

Vouched for your dead comment - I’m still thinking about it, don’t agree nor disagree, but prob worth engaging with instead of killin’

Miraste 6 hours ago

Hidden? Every device with a voice assistant has been advertising always-on recording for a decade plus.

cromka 6 hours ago

We're talking about LG TV style recording.

Also, the assistants are not recording, they're analyzing sound wave for the trigger word. This isn't recording, it's been explained countless times already.

This whole conversation is about taking it to next level.

Miraste 5 hours ago

I do see your point, but what the assistants are doing is recording. It's only a second or two, on-device, and not stored, but it is already a recording. Apple is just changing the duration and retention.

I think as soon as the original capability launched the game was over. People don't understand technical distinctions like that and they've already accepted it.

cromka 13 minutes ago

If there's nothing left and it's deleted, then it's not recorded.

I am talking about the recording that lasts. Recording people's voice without their consent, on your behalf, and transcribing the text for your later use. It's not volatile 2s analyzed by the DSP, it's an actual record of conversation.

This is not the same recording.

But yes, I see your point, too, maybe back then we got used to it at an even less intrusive level. So it progresses, slowly, but surely, like a frog in a pot.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

Doesn’t sound like it’s taking it to any other level, except that the wake criteria is handled a little more securely.

athrowaway3z 6 hours ago

The fuck are you talking about? Doing it safely is extremely easy and already solved: have the user be root.

This is about remote control. People who think Apple/Google/Microsoft will just pass on the reigns of that remote control are dangerously naïve.

Apple has locked down whole classes of third-party utilities for its mobile system and Google is copying them as we speak. We are slowing progress at great cost by letting them lock-in and rent seek.

cromka 6 hours ago

WHAT

butterlesstoast 5 hours ago

unhinged comment lol

throwaway-blaze 4 hours ago

There's an argument to be made that progress on desktop personal computers has been faster because hackers (in the good sense) can hack around and invent new stuff in ways you really cannot on mobile/tablet locked-down hardware and software.

The commenter may have sounded unhinged but the thesis is sound.

kqp 2 hours ago

TVs died. Not fully, but they went from the ubiquity of smartphones to the “oh yeah I’ve got one lying around” of VR. The shit they’ve been up to since is a response to trying to recover a much bigger industry’s profits by juicing a remainder that they’ve realized is so inert they’ll let you do anything to them. I really hope the resemblance to mainstream tech is minimal.

Arkhaine_kupo 7 hours ago

The issue seems like every other company is speed racing into data capture (and perhaps surveillance). There is obviously some end user advantages to all that data and continuos listening of signals, which other companies leverage as "features" rather than their entire business model.

So if everyone else has a feature that lets you use your voice all the time as an input device, you are seen behind the times if you don't offer it. But at the same time if you want to offer protection for that feature, not being able to access it outside the device is the only acceptable answer.

Consumers who are more discerning, privacy conscious and technologically literate would be best. But without that being an option, having one major company still even pretend to care about privacy is at least refreshing

cromka 7 hours ago

The issue with this particular Watch is they talk so much about the privacy of the recording from device's owner perspective, while they completely disregard the aspect of consensuality of third parties who are also being recorded.

This is the same as with the Meta glasses and that's where I believe said Overton window is being expanded to. I am not one for conspiracy theories but it's not hard to notice the sudden appearance of these devices and their "this is cool" and the implied "what is even your problem" gaslighting advertising.

rpastuszak 7 hours ago

Nah you're misreading it, it's just a creative interpretation of the famous Kent Beck comment:

"for each desired change, make the change easy, then make the easy change"

cromka 6 hours ago

That's brilliant

grishka 7 hours ago

Apple themselves keep assuming that they themselves can be unquestionably trusted. The same company that keeps inventing ever more elaborate ways to forcibly insert itself between users and developers to collect rent even when explicitly required by regulators to open up its devices to allow anyone to freely install anything.

seanmcdirmid 7 hours ago

They did firewall it from the OS, but yes, you have to trust that Apple engineered it the way they said they engineered it.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

Secure enclave, pcc, etc are things that get submitted for independent auditing and certification. At least for some stuff.

roughly 7 hours ago

Apple’s agreement is that if you trust Apple, their stuff is the best in the business - if Apple is not a weak link, it’s real hard to argue with the design, and the ease of use and UX for the level of security you get is unequal anywhere else. Apple’s side of the bargain is you pay them money, and lots of it.

If you don’t trust Apple, you’re on your own - you can probably recreate all this on a FOSS stack, but you’re gonna have to do it repeatedly for everything, and you’re on the hook for explaining it to everyone you know so they can use it, too. It’s not that you _can’t_ do it yourself, it’s just a whole lot harder than if you accept the bargain and trust Apple.

Whether or not you want to do that is up to you, but I don’t think anyone’s in the dark on what the bargain is.

j45 7 hours ago

All the trust is just one decisions or change away from current state.

Barbing 6 hours ago

That’s part of the agreement too. Ternus or next guy/gal messes up one huge thing in any significant way, trust is burned and they’re just another Google.

(They are on watchlist for Apple Maps & other ads…)

roughly 4 hours ago

And the reason to trust Apple is because they recognize this - they’re not under any illusion about why their products command a premium, and so the security and privacy angle is (or should be) one of the sacred cows inside Apple.

And you’re absolutely right - as soon as they break the value proposition, the value of their package and the price people are willing to pay for it drops in half and they’ve all the sudden gotta compete with Google and Samsung and Huaiwei and the rest of that jungle, and that market sucks.

j45 4 hours ago

I understand the argument that the lesser of two bad options is the better one.

The massive issue in all of this is digital identity.

Everyone is a citizen of a private corporation without any rights or access points to their digital identity.

Humans rely on our digital identity (email accounts, iCloud, google, etc) for nearly everything.

In many ways, it's like the equivalent of using our license or other ID in physical spaces.

Except, humans are relying on digital identities provided as digital citizens of corporations (Google, Apple, Microsoft, etc), whereby they do no have teh same recourse that official access points of data do.

If at any given time, the majority of the identity providers are generally or ultimately not on the side of the identity holders (human) wrt to their inalienable rights.

There's no easy answer for this. Convenience has been used as a massive tradeoff for security for 10-15 years to the point that most people don't know better, or that there were and can be better options.

Downplaying the fact that the single change of a few sentences could change for worse the promises any corporation makes (it's not entitled to serve the user's needs first, after all).

Security and Privacy in Apple certainly seem to be better, but are not the best they could be.

Privacy and security, especially where it comes to protecting people from increasing threats online including AI bots, is not going to come from corporations alone, they haven't been able to build or roll them out while they learn at the expense of people.

There's no answer being pointed to, only that Apple being the only vendor with some promises isn't very good at all.

j45 4 hours ago

There are valid arguments to owning your hardware independent of the software that runs on it.

Otherwise you don't really own your hardware.

LLMs will be able to secure (and insecure) more and more hardware as time goes on.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

More than one. The Apple Wallet fiasco, apple maps thing, etc have tested customer perception, before. Even some utter bullshit ones like the battery thing… they still sound like trust violations to dummies.

There’s some resilience, there.

j45 3 hours ago

Some resilience there for sure, sometimes the products were just plain early... Apple Maps comes to mind when it first came out, it took a while for it to become more.. complete.

The new ability to add one's own passes to Apple Wallet is nice though. Long overdue.

Loquebantur 6 hours ago

You're in the dark yourself already, as you frame the bargain in a simplistic way. You imply, this was just about having "nice stuff" and the lack of short-term alternatives was imposing merely a life-style choice upon you.

The systemic "lack of alternatives" is steering you, you confuse "not knowing alternatives" with the actual absence of alternatives and ignore possible further implications entirely.

The pattern is systemic capture, keeping you sedated about it is part of the scheme.

roughly 4 hours ago

Do I sound sedated?

DaiPlusPlus 6 hours ago

> their stuff is the best in the business

And yet, won't let me control my Nest Thermostat

(I'm not saying this is exclusively Apple's fault: the lack of Nest interop is Google's fault, but Apple isn't making it easy for third-parties to build Apple-Google bridges either)

vineyardmike 6 hours ago

The new nest thermostats can be controlled by Apple Home fwiw

(They support Matter protocol)

FireBeyond 6 hours ago

I find it frustrating that I can’t drive HomeKit externally. I have a large home ecosystem, something in the order of 100 devices, from lights to outlets to motion sensors to security and locks to the garage door, some native and some bridged via HomeBridge. I have a bunch of scenes and automations.

But I have, for example, a couple of Brilliant smart wall panels (one gang sized little panels with lighting and other controls) that I have to duplicate because despite the Brilliant being able to expose devices as a bridge to HomeKit I can’t say “Run this Scene” because Apple doesn’t allow external integrations to do so.

elictronic 4 hours ago

That's a Nest issue, not an apple one. Google neutered their own API as of 2019, then did even more shenanigans after that. It's a google product, assume it will be killed the moment whoever is actively working it sees a new shiny.

vineyardmike 6 hours ago

> you can probably recreate all this on a FOSS stack, but you’re gonna have to do it repeatedly for everything

I’m honestly surprised in the age of vibe-coding we haven’t seen someone try to build out a direct “open walled garden”.

AI could solve the basic coverage on every operating system and screen shape, while the various p2p technologies have gotten really good and when combined with mDNS and maybe an encrypted byo-cloud-storage (eg drive, Dropbox, etc APIs) for async data synching. The nerd side is build a data sync layer, then a variety of apps and products can be built on top of it.

It doesn’t necessarily need to work as well as Apple, nor as rich features, it just needs to support enough devices well enough to allow heterogeneous-platform households or friends to share what they need.

roughly 4 hours ago

Yeah, so this is also why there’s a raft of stuff Apple will never support integrations with. They’ll bill it under security, and they’re not entirely wrong, but it’s also a threat to their core value prop, so you’ll never get open source iMessage, for example.

halJordan 4 hours ago

Are you kidding me? The absolutely vile vitriol that the members of the open source/modding/FOSS/self-hosting communities have been spitting out for actual years now, against ai and against vibe coding and against the people who use either has been so tremendously effective. And you want to know why someone hasn't used ai to gift you an entire ecosystem? What an incredibly out of touch statement to have to read on this site, where so much of the vitriol lives even today.

astrange 2 hours ago

Vibe coding hasn't existed for years, has it?

elictronic 4 hours ago

Please spend tokens recreating Homeassistant. Signed -AI companies.

victorbjorklund 6 hours ago

That is pretty much the case with any software that you don't build and host yourself. Is it possible that they are lying? Sure.

hnav 6 hours ago

This is true of all forms of confidential compute.

slashdave 5 hours ago

You do realize that those two goals conflict.

gosub100 6 hours ago

Then they'll share the information with the government under the guise of "think of the children" or "stopping racism". Anyone against the conversation collection will be pro child abuse, or in support of antisemitism.

cromka 5 hours ago

I am afraid that this is indeed being orchestrated. Apple's ad explaining why you'd want that recording working on your Watch was really pulling some very odd use cases, like the restaurant specials. Which got me thinking they had a product first and then needed to justify its existence....

alexchamberlain 4 hours ago

Isn't this "just" the latest iteration of a coprocessor?

isodev 7 hours ago

So Apple pinky-promises they will record everything you do at home and they won't use it? In any way? I find this really hard to believe. Apple is into ads now, so would you let Google/Meta see and listen inside your home all day? Nope.

4fterd4rk 7 hours ago

Conspiracy theories are easy. Now go prove that Apple is lying. They have so much to lose it makes no sense for them to lie.

newspaper1 7 hours ago

I won't be risking it. Just use Home Assistant.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/apple-buys-israeli-startup-rep...

ruszki 7 hours ago

I think the burden of the proof should be on Apple's side first.

selectodude 6 hours ago

Apple can’t prove a negative. You have to prove they’re lying.

newspaper1 6 hours ago

You don't have to prove anything. You need to asses your risk profile and decide if you want to expose yourself to Apple or not.

ruszki 6 hours ago

You can. They do all the time in math and programming.

fckgw 6 hours ago

They've published several whitepapers and technical documentation on how the secure enclave works and it's been poked at by security researchers for years.

newspaper1 6 hours ago

If it's not open source (with open hardware), you cannot trust it. Whitepapers are great, but who knows what's actually implemented.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

They have been. Through years of use, independent auditing, industry and government certification processes, and their Apple Security Research program.

ethbr1 6 hours ago

The rub with a locked-in, incompatible platform is that a company must not only not be lying now... but into the future.

Anyone who thinks Apple is going to fight for their users if their revenue slips targets and stock tanks is an idiot.

Money talks.

dd8601fn 3 hours ago

“100% Guaranteed safe and properly managed forever” has never, and will never exist, for anything connected to the world.

Least of all with home rolled solutions. Contrary to popular belief.

runjake 6 hours ago

1. Try to obtain an Apple Security Research Device (SRD)[1] or a jailbroken iPhone.

2. Set up TLS MITM between the device and the Internet. Install the cert on the device.

3. On the device, disable certificate pinning for Apple's apps.

4. Use the device normally, observe all the telemetry flowing to Apple.

You might be a little shocked at the amount of... personal and usage details sent to Apple FQDNs.

Remember: Privacy is a feature of the Apple Marketing dept -- not SWE!

  1. https://security.apple.com/research-device/

mmmlinux 6 hours ago

Do you have any more info. Or are you just going to hand wave away all the actual details, suggesting we do the research our self.

danudey 6 hours ago

Let's please dispense with the "trust me bro" paranoia takes. Link to something that demonstrates your point or you're just making baseless accusations that discourage people from trusting actual privacy and security research.

newspaper1 6 hours ago

You can call Apple support and they can remotely take control of your entire phone. They have access to everything if they want it.

comboy 7 hours ago

The point is that they don't have to pinky promise. It's as if you said yubikey pinky promises it won't share your private key.

I think it's actually a very good approach. Obviously depends on actual implementation details, but the premise is good.

grishka 7 hours ago

Except if a device has a microphone and a network interface, it has the technical capability of sharing those recordings. The only realistic way to guarantee this sort of thing is to reverse engineer the entire chain between the two and then never install any software updates.

comboy 6 hours ago

Secure Enclave is not a new concept.

> The only realistic way to guarantee this sort of thing is to reverse engineer the entire chain between the two and then never install any software updates.

Reverse engineer the hardware and not change it, that's the whole point, it's not in the software, only queries after the keyword are passed forward (if I'm understanding correctly, gee I don't even like apple much, things I choose to spend my time on..)

chirau 7 hours ago

So what was the furore about when that Ring/Amazon superbowl ad happened. They have to promise and they should be able to be held liable if that promise is not kept.

isodev 6 hours ago

> Obviously depends on actual implementation details

So Apple can ship whatever update they want, doing whatever with no oversight or independent review. No thanks - you folks are forgetting the US a surveillance state.

A device with no physical switch for it's microphone and cameras worries me and it's just not worth whatever minor convenience this adds.

merely-unlikely 6 hours ago

> you folks are forgetting the US a surveillance state

This is exactly why Apple emphasizes they lack the ability (keys) to decrypt your data stored on iCloud or in transit. US courts will demand it, and this way Apple can say it literally is unable to comply no matter what the court orders. You can certainly choose not to believe them, but at least they are making the legal argument in actual court cases. I don’t see the other big tech companies doing that.

thenthenthen 7 hours ago

Can they be mitm’ed like the Ledger wallet?

alasano 6 hours ago

I presume MITMdling Apple is not even close to as easy (or profitable) as Ledger.

AceJohnny2 4 hours ago

the whole point is no.

amelius 6 hours ago

Meanwhile their silicon fab can modify the design so the data is still leaking elsewhere ...

danudey 6 hours ago

I mean, if your privacy concern is 'silicon can be backdoored' then you can't trust any technology anywhere, ever.

amelius 6 hours ago

Yes? It's just a matter of time before governments figure out they can simply use AI to backdoor designs and insert themselves anywhere in the supply chain. If it isn't happening yet, it soon will be ...

compounding_it 5 hours ago

>AI to backdoor designs

correction: AI to backdoor vibe-coded designs

if anyone has read the trusting trust paper, one will know you can theoretically create code where vulnerabilities are hidden in plain sight. But that would mean its designed and reviewed by people who don't understand it in the first place.

monocasa 5 hours ago

That sounds like a bad idea.

The point of a secure enclave is to reduce the attack surface to something you can actually reason about the entire thing.

Sticking more and more in there is asking to defeat the whole purpose.

flanz_10 4 hours ago

fwiw enclave and exclave are different words. and thus, they mean different things

monocasa 2 hours ago

Some of us are dyslexic (and given that it's commonly comorbid with ADHD and autism, it's pretty prevalent on HN). You don't have to be a dick about it.

For those following along, the Secure Enclave is a separate core that runs most of the security stuff (including hardware like the fingerprint scanner), and Secure Exclaves are essentially virtual machines on the main AP cores used as a security boundary for specific tasks, kind of like Qubes does.

CodeWriter23 5 hours ago

> Secure Exclaves that process the camera and microphone feeds in a secure compartment that cannot be accessed by the operating system or by Apple

So...no voice command? Or, is accessible by operating system or Apple?

factorialboy 4 hours ago

> that cannot be accessed by the operating system or by Apple

Does any third party periodically verify and audit this claim?

— or —

Do we blindly "just trust Apple, bro"?

postalcoder 9 hours ago

The overwhelming cynicism about this product I'm seeing here on HN tells me it's going to be a hit.

r0fl 9 hours ago

At $299 they’ll sell millions of these in no time

The Apple TV is the same price

iPhones and iPads are so expensive these days that this feels like a steal

I’m buying one for my parents and one for my in-laws for Christmas. Easy $300 gift that I know they won’t have.

I’m sure I’m not the only one who will have that idea

SomeonesAccount 9 hours ago

Exactly. Perfect gift

a012 8 hours ago

Me too, it’s much cheaper and more convenient than you have to have a dedicated phone that for everyone could use at home.

llm_nerd 8 hours ago

>The Apple TV is the same price

This is a funny framing. For those who don't know, the Apple TV 4K debuted at $129 USD. Apple then slightly improved the remote and bumped the price up to $199 USD.

Now today they announced a marginal upgrade -- they added a microphone in the base unit and not just on-demanded toggled on the remote, such that it will always be listening, along with a slightly improved CPU -- and they pumped the price to $299 USD.

So sure, the Apple TV is the "same price", to basically universal derision because they took a successful product and decided to turn it into a shakedown.

And to the root post about how great of a success this will be, virtually an identical top-ranked comment happened in the Vision Pro release. I mean, every flopped product has someone doing the "wow I guess it's going to be a huge success" when people question the point.

a012 8 hours ago

The Vision Pro would be successful if they priced it to sub $1000

troupo 6 hours ago

And AppleTV which could've been the hub for home automation is crippled in every possible way and is all but useless for this purpose.

compounding_it 5 hours ago

My guess is that memory is the real reason for the price upgrade. Apple probably added some things to mask the price increase but the real reason is the chip. The old 4GB ram in A15 Bionic probably bumped in price so it went up to 199$ and now the new chip costs even more. Also its easier for Apple to make the same chip in a lot of hardware as opposed to having multiple chips being made, especially when its fused with memory and thats costing a lot.

llm_nerd 4 hours ago

Sure, Apple's BoM has definitely increased given the pressures on the fabs.

By no analysis remotely at the pace that their MSRP has, however.

The primary reason the price has spiralled is that Apple is running out of new markets, so every product needs to feed the greed to a greatest extent as they increasingly squeeze their existing customers. It's the same reason why there are paid ads in the AppStore, on Apple Maps, and so on. Expect this behaviour to become more obvious.

artisinal 8 hours ago

I bet the local thrift stores are going to love all the gifted HomeViews they are going to receive in 2027.

cromka 7 hours ago

It's crazy that the LG doorbell camera, which is basically a video sensor with a button, i.e. way, WAY less of a hardware, is $249.

Where do they get that pricing from?

compounding_it 5 hours ago

>Where do they get that pricing from?

I cant buy the LG doorbell camera at my local mall in a fancy store. I had not even heard of it until now.

Volumes of 100s of millions on chips and volumes in hundreds of thousands will have a huge price difference. We are talking 2 orders of magnitude higher.

moralestapia 7 hours ago

If I could hack/root these somehow, even just sideload an app of my choice it would be massive for my personal life.

I have a lot of sensors, and always build variations of "a dashboard with a touchscreen" to play with them.

Insta-buy for me :).

alerighi 7 hours ago

$299 is not cheap, is more than what the phone that the average person has costs (that is not an iPhone). And with a smartphone you surely can do much more things than that object. With $299 you can also buy a tablet, even a decent one, where you can install whatever app you want.

But even if it did cost $10, it would still be a waste of money because you spend $10 on an useless product, you would be better to spend them to eat a pizza, it would be more useful.

What do you use it for? This reminds me of the digital photo frames that everyone had back in the days and that were almost finished in a drawer after 1 month of usage.

A useless device that sits on a table with the sole purpose to waste electricity, that for what it costs these days, better to use it for something more useful.

pixelatedindex 6 hours ago

> $299 is not cheap … But even if it did cost $10, it would still be a waste of money because you spend $10 on an useless product

Moving goalposts aside, how do you know it’s useless? You might not have a use for it, but it’s weird to make such blanket statements for a product that hasn’t even been out yet.

mahboi 6 hours ago

$300 doesn't buy you a decent tablet, let alone a laptop. I say this because I thought about using it in a conference room, but lack of 3P apps means never mind.

gyomu 9 hours ago

Well, this is Hacker News, and you can’t even make apps for the device - there’s nothing to hack on. Of course this audience isn’t excited about it. It’s a Facebook Portal, with better privacy (at least).

mahboi 6 hours ago

Installing apps on a phone isn't hacking. An actual hacker would find ways to make this run Marble Blast Gold.

elxr 4 hours ago

Hacker news isn't just programmers nowadays.

If this didn't have apps, but did have beautifully designed physical inputs, a color e-ink, and cost 1/3 as much I'd still be very excited for it.

It's just a bit derivative and isn't priced to take over the market (like the mac mini in 2025 was).

spiderfarmer 8 hours ago

My problem is mainly with the family dynamic in their 'film'. Nobody in that ad seems happy, they even seem to hate each other. Is this normal enough in the US that people can ignore it and focus on the product?

robotshmobot 8 hours ago

This is just what technologists think families are like

moralestapia 7 hours ago

If that were my family, I'd run away and cut all contact with them.

If this is what families are like in the US, I can understand why people become massive drug addicts and even to take their lives ...

spiderfarmer 4 hours ago

Well, if their leadership is anything to go by..

djeastm 7 hours ago

I don't know about hate, but it is funny to see their take on the modern family (no pun intended).

retsibsi 6 hours ago

Hah, I just watched it on your recommendation. I think they were going for the vibe of a cynical sitcom... but they forgot to put any decent jokes in, and they didn't do what successful sitcoms do and paper over the nastiness with charisma and some moments of warmth. So it's just 3 minutes or so of stress-inducing bleakness.

spiderfarmer 2 hours ago

Even if they succeeded in the sitcom idea, how does that promote their product? It’s easily the worst ad from Apple I have seen in a long time.

glst0rm 2 hours ago

The teen is just like my son ... but unlike the dad I don't allow him to be a jerky meanypants. What a pushover dad.

afavour 8 hours ago

Yeah I'm absolutely the market for this thing. We have an old Google Home that we use as a digital photo frame and Google has progressively destroyed every other piece of functionality we once used on it.

My only complaint is that a truly environmentally friendly company (like Apple claims to be!) would make this OS available for old iPads. I'm quite sure they're capable of running it (or at least a stripped down version thereof) and lots of people have old iPad Minis sitting around.

eddieroger 8 hours ago

Cynicism about selling new devices aside, if they really want Siri intelligence on these, old iPads can't do it, and Apple won't (if they can avoid it) sell a "product" with varying features.

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

The multi-user Face ID enclave also sounds like hardware that old iPads don't have.

etempleton 8 hours ago

I think it is a neat product with two strange limitations that I can't quite figure out:

1. No apps. This would be perfect for my kitchen but I like to watch videos, movies, tv shows while I cook. The aspect ratio is not ideal, but the fact it won't support third party apps means that is not an option. Maybe it will support Airplay video and I can cast from my phone?

2. No battery means it is stuck to the wall. They had to work around this limitation in their own (excellent) promo video by drilling a hole in the middle of their kitchen island. The device would have a lot more utility if it could be moved around a lot and then say in a base station like a Sonos Move.

adamesque 8 hours ago

From the product website:

"Additional apps. HomeView supports compatible third-party audio and video apps from your iPhone for a familiar experience across devices."

If I had to guess this would be kind of similar to the way CarPlay supports apps, but it's admittedly possible this just means "you can use AirPlay yaaaay".

etempleton 8 hours ago

Yeah, I assume, but they haven’t shown that at all. I would be fine with a standard AirPlay video implementation.

chipotle_coyote 8 hours ago

As adamesque wrote, it's going to be more like the Watch or even CarPlay. And I think this is probably the right approach, market-wise: Apple ran with the idea that every device needs its own standalone app ecosystem, to the point where they even tried putting an app store in iMessage, and it didn't really work out. Apps on the Apple TV that aren't effectively "channels" (i.e., streaming services) have mostly fizzled, and I bet most readers even on Hacker News forgot that the Watch even had a standalone app store for a while. The HomeView absolutely seems like the kind of device that's going to do better with "companion apps": install them on your phone and let them install a little mini-app or widget on the HomeView. I don't need to manage a whole new set of apps on my smart home gadget---I just need to be able to futz with lights and the thermostat, listen to music and podcasts with the music and podcast app of my choice, and get to my recipe app if I'm going to be one of those monsters who puts one in the kitchen.

As for the battery, this doesn't look like a kind of device that's intended to travel with you room to room---but I agree it would have been smart for them to give people the option.

etempleton 8 hours ago

Yeah, as long as there is a way to cast video to the device I think it works...some consumers may struggle with that as they are used to apps being on device, but it works for me.

The battery issue, I agree it is kind of a single room device, but I could see wanting to move it around the room I am in. If I am say, washing dishes versus cooking at the stove, versus doing prep work. Right now I move an iPad around with me in the kitchen. Also, for when there is a facetime call being able to best position it for what I am currently doing verus having to move to the device and face it.

jonhohle 8 hours ago

Unless made for a square display, video will not be ideal on this device. Even SD NTSC content is 4:3 and would require cropping or matting. Anything modern would be tiny on this display.

I think the aspect ratio makes sense for the form factor, recipes, FaceTime, music, etc. but it won’t be a very good video device.

etempleton 7 hours ago

Yeah, and the screen is just 7 inches to begin with. I just don’t know if I would get enough utility out of this device… I think it would be more interesting if it was a MagSafe dock for an iPad and that put the iPad into home hub mode or something.

troupo 6 hours ago

> to the point where they even tried putting an app store in iMessage

Wveryone tried to put app atores inside messages because that's what all messaging apps in South East Asia do.

However, none of western companies ever actually understood how that works.

edlea 6 hours ago

I built an iMessage app that allows my wife and I to easily send goal updates from our daughter's football matches. Typing who scored what goal, or even keeping track of the score to send to each other when you're standing on the sideline in the cold and rain on a Saturday morning wasn't fun. This works so much better.

The right app, in the right place can make a lot of sense

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

The built-in "Check In" app is really great (it automates the "text my parent/friend/relative when I get home" flow, including texting obvious delays from GPS tracking data). iMessage apps are a good idea in general even without a "deep bench ecosystem". Though obviously when it was added Apple was hoping for something like the ecosystem seen in the Asian messenger app space where WeChat and others became the primary app stores and "everything" became a messenger app for a while. (Even in Europe there have been points where WhatsApp had a huge app ecosystem.)

Arguably part of why those app ecosystems worked so well was because they were a cross-platform app experience and iMessage only working for Apple devices and most iMessage apps only capable of strong experiences in "blue chat" iMessage user only streams was always a hiccup for why Apple didn't see a larger uptake in the iMessage app ecosystem.

kridsdale3 2 hours ago

CheckIn IS great, I use it daily since "when are you coming home" is otherwise something I'd be asked.

Infuriatingly though it appears to have zero data saving of preferences. I have to manually type my home address and select driving mode, every single time. It's like 30 taps when it could be 1. I sent them a Radar. I'm sure it will never be looked at.

Just now, I realized I can just vibecode my own version.

groundzeros2015 8 hours ago

Apps sucks. The phone is the only one people use apps for and even then. When was the las time you wanted to install an app?

mat_epice 7 hours ago

I agree that a battery would have been nice. My first thought was that I would like to move this around in my kitchen while I'm doing this and that.

That said, since it's USB-C, it's possible to put a battery pack on it. Cue the third-party ecosystem making a specially shaped battery that can attach to the base (or compatible stand mount with battery for the wall-mounted version).

joewhale 8 hours ago

Agree. $300 for a speaker + home automation hub + timer + digital picture frame appeals to a lot of older people and busy parents who spend a lot of time in the kitchen.

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

My parents have been using an Alexa screen for years for this, but then started buying cheap Android-based picture frames because they somewhat want out of the Alexa ecosystem (and also couldn't resist "cheap" for larger form factor picture displays). I could definitely see recommending this as an option to consolidate their ecosystems somewhat.

parasti 8 hours ago

This being the top comment posted mere 30 minutes after the article itself tells me the cynicism is not overwhelming.

artisinal 8 hours ago

"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

mleo 8 hours ago

I can’t wait to get rid of the last of one retailer/tech giant’s ad machines in my house and replace it with another tech giant’s device. No sarcasm there either. Going down to one voice system across all devices available in house and out of the house, easily, will be nice.

microtonal 8 hours ago

Shrug

It looks like a nice device at a reasonable price. I looked at the video, but it doesn't solve any problems I have. We ban screens at the dinner table, it's for having attention for each other, not for screens. I never have to ask for a recipe for french toast, it's either in my head, or in cookbook, or written down on paper. The very rare number of cases someone loses their key, we can just look it up with Find My on the phone, it's such an irregular occurrence that it's not a hassle to find it with a phone. For random queries, phones with Siri can already listen, but the voice recognition or LLM fails on too many queries anyway not to be frustrating.

I could see it being useful as an additional control panel for the smart home, but Home Kit and the Home app are still pretty useless for the smart home. It can't even show a temperature graph or trend, let alone do many other things. So I would like a Home Assistant/Homey/whatever display (which would be possible if it supported apps).

I am sure this will sell plenty. It's an Apple device, people will just buy it for that reason, especially if it's not in the Apple Vision Pro price class. Will the get used a lot? Probably by a very small subset of people. Just like Siri doesn't get used a lot beyond setting timers when you are not in an English-speaking country, or even worse, use multiple languages in daily life. I am not in the US and most people I know never use Siri.

Aside from that most people seem to be more interested in digital detox than getting more pervasive tech in their lives.

odiroot 8 hours ago

It's definitely going to be a hit among people locked in the Apple ecosystem.

charlesabarnes 8 hours ago

People were cynical on here about the Apple Vision Pro as well...

phoghed 7 hours ago

Every human on earth was cynical about that thing, but it was mainly price driven by my recollection. This thing is relatively cheap.

joshstrange 6 hours ago

The AVP failed on price, yes, but also the limitations of the software (and lack of content, which I think go hand-in-hand).

The AVP was just an iPad that you strapped to your face. Yes, it had apps, but they could only do more-or-less the same things an iPad app could (in 3D, sure).

That's why I returned mine, it was way too limiting of a platform for the cost. This, while cheaper, is even more limited (no apps).

bigyabai 6 hours ago

> Every human on earth was cynical about that thing

You should go and reread the HN thread then. There were people ripping the "Nomad" quote and insisting that it was the next big thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36201593

Some excerpts from top comments:

  But it's going to be a hit. HN is going to be swamped with "How I used Vision Pro to..." posts when it comes out.

  It would very obviously be useful for work if you can actually get high res, effectively unlimited monitor space.

  [...] considering it is a phone, laptop and massive display bundled into I'm pretty sure there's a more than sustainable market for it.

  It’s come in at $3499 and if it performs as good as those videos make out then, if anything, it’s a bargain.
Suffice it to say, there are people that will just say whatever is satisfying to them regardless of how good the product actually is. Maybe a better example is the HomePod, which died an agonizing death despite the people who were certain that the smart home was Apple's final frontier.

phoghed 2 hours ago

This is one of the most out of touch social media platforms. The Vision Pro was universally ripped on everywhere else.

Idk what you’re talking about with the HomePod. It’s still on sale now, they just announced a new one today. Sure it’s not doing AirPods numbers most likely, but it’s not the same category of failure as Vision Pro.

tuesdaynight 7 hours ago

Yes, I predict the same outcome. For one, I would buy it if I could. I don't get why people think this won't sell when Alexa has a market (and I believe that Apple can be better at a consumer device than Amazon)

tibbon 7 hours ago

A failure, just like Dropbox!

cromka 7 hours ago

Product is great, IMHO, but it ties a whole family to one company's complete set of Hardware, Software and Service offerings.

I feel like it may be the kind of product that makes people realize how much they had become owned by one coroporation.

mihaaly 7 hours ago

The audience here does not really represent the generic population.

And, as the word hit usually meant for something positive, I just wish to highlight that being a financial success does not always mean that something is sensible, worthwhile, beneficial considering the overall picture. Usually being pretty is enough.

vachina 6 hours ago

A product needs to fulfill the needs of the lowest common denominator to become a hit. This does not seem to address or solve any problems of the lowest common denominator.

It is like the Apple XDR display. Cool to have, but useless in the grand scheme of things.

partiallypro 6 hours ago

I think this entire form factor is useless when you have phones and tablets around the house. Will it sell? Probably, it's Apple. Will people use it for anything other than a clock on their counter and maybe a smart speaker? I would bet no.

glhaynes 2 hours ago

I wish there were anywhere that adults could talk about interesting stuff intelligently without a thousand stupid and/or I've-already-thought-about-this-and-the-basic-talking-points-aren't-going-to-change-my-mind arguments taking up 99% of the space.

I feel like maybe the answer is browser-integrated LLM plugins tasked with "I don't ever want to see anything having to do with this topic of argument ever again."

Brendinooo 9 hours ago

Props to Apple for making this. Always cool to see them try stuff. That said:

I watched their video demo with the family getting ready in the morning: there are some interesting ideas here but imo if this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me. Like: FaceTime while cooking, sure, but those calls tend to happen on Messenger and Snapchat for us. Music in the kitchen, sure, but I run Plexamp. My kids are always stealing my iPad to run the Toybox 3D printer; this would be a great thing for them to use.

And so on.

My house has a bunch of spots on the wall where an old intercom system used to live: it'd obviously be a budget buster to buy a bunch of these to fit in those slots but even if you did, you'd need Apple to provide an intercom solution (a la the Watch's Walkie-Talkie?) or you're...out of luck.

gyomu 9 hours ago

I suspect this might be the beginning of a new turn for Apple strategy under Ternus: more satellite hardware that’s cheap(ish) compared to the flagship devices & locked down, reliant on your iPhone to do anything useful, pushing you to use exclusively Apple services rather than 3rd party ones. The App Store strategy is a thing of the past.

Brendinooo 9 hours ago

Yeah, this is interesting to think about.

Maybe it's a bet on LLMs/Siri AI as well: all of the not-iPhone devices become more useful if you can control them well with your voice.

I think people do feel some tension about staring at their phones all day and like the idea that the phone can stay in the pocket or on a desk while stuff like the Watch and maybe a HomeView or a HomePod could cover a lot of the little usages along the way. (I'm not sure people would ACTUALLY use them that way, but I could see it driving some sales.)

msdz 8 hours ago

> people do feel some tension about staring at their phones all day

That, plus the crowd who would want or like to hack on a device like this, or at least use a non-Apple app or service, is probably far outnumbered by people who don’t care what (and whose) software can run on their screen in the home as long as it looks nice and works well, which is typically the case for Apple.

joshstrange 6 hours ago

> some tension about staring at their phones all day

They talk about it more but very few (low enough to not effectively not matter) actually do anything about it. If you want to spend less time on your phone you can... just do it. Setup screen time and practice an ounce of self-discipline.

It's the same as when people say "People hate their phones so that's why we created <AI Pendant>", uh people _love_ their phones, some to an unhealthy degree but I've never bought into the idea that people are actually pinning for a way to use their phones less. That's why it's going to be a massive uphill battle for OpenAI to break into the hardware space IMHO.

Apple wasn't wrong in their Keynote about how the perfect "AI" device is already in your pocket. Now, it's more limited than it should be due to the locked down nature of Apple's phones but if you could build anything without restriction on the iPhone platform then yes, it would be a great AI platform.

EDC9599190 8 hours ago

I could see that.

Apple wants to design the best UI for everything and be the front-end to everything their users interact with.

Home automation is a good place to gain market share among their upper income clientele.

criddell 8 hours ago

Surely this device has to be mostly a Cook project, no?

Lalabadie 8 hours ago

Ternus being named CEO is a long-term project that certainly includes him and Tim Cook. I don't think it's a surprise to anyone internally that there are several big releases after his nomination.

fcarraldo 8 hours ago

Wouldn't this have been in-development for quite some time under Cook?

mastax 7 hours ago

Ternus was the Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering and by reports was leading the charge on this stuff.

throw4356h3w 7 hours ago

Reminds me of what Xiaomi does. They have an assortment of Home products that all tie in together with their ecosystem/apps.

I use an iPhone, but I have a lamp, a shaver, and sunglasses from Xiaomi.

pkulak 7 hours ago

That's the big agent play for everyone. What good is this thing unless your whole family has an iphone, you use iCloud for email/calendar/contacts, you have HomeKit running your house, AppleTV, etc? Failing that, it's a big, voice-activated kitchen timer; just like everything else.

joshstrange 6 hours ago

Rumor has it that this product has been kicking around internally for 1-2 years waiting on a better Siri to pair with it. Meaning it would have been released under Cook if not for the disastrous showing of Siri and all things AI from Apple.

I really hope this is just something that was all packaged up to release and didn't make sense to kill it. I mean, I still think they picked wrong and they should have shelved it and the LG device integrations. I really hope it's not a sign of what's to come with Ternus.

HumblyTossed 6 hours ago

He's been CEO for a week. Product development timelines are longer than that.

notfried 8 hours ago

It makes sense they'd eventually do that. The Apple TV didn't launch with an App Store, and it took 8 years after its first generation to get an App Store! I'd guess Apple sees that most apps wouldn't make sense for the HomeView, and they'll likely restrict what categories of apps can launch on it.

MichaelZuo 8 hours ago

Yeah the lack of an app store is fine for the first year.

But the requirement for everyone to have an ipad or iphone on 27.2 or later (for full functionality) seems more of a showstopper. I would have been in the market for one but haven’t even bothered to upgrade past iOS 18 yet.

wat10000 7 hours ago

I doubt that people who are still running an OS version from two years ago are a significant potential market for this.

swiftcoder 6 hours ago

> still running an OS version from two years ago

Part of Apple's whole appeal is that you get OS patches for a really long time. Outside of tech enthusiast circles, it's not that common to YOLO into bleeding-edge OS updates

wat10000 5 hours ago

It's hardly "YOLO into bleeding-edge OS updates" to run something more recent than a 2024 major release.

Anyway, I'm not criticizing. Run what you like! I just don't expect the overlap between "buys Apple device in entirely new category" and "running OS version from two years ago" to be very large.

Kwpolska an hour ago

iOS 27 came out a month ago, and 27.2 is currently in beta, so buying this device does require being on the bleeding edge.

swiftcoder 34 minutes ago

I'd also add that 26 was not universally well-received, so there were a lot of holdouts who are still running the previous version

Jolter 34 minutes ago

It’s fairly safe to say that every user who still didn’t upgrade to 27 by now, has made an active choice to postpone the upgrade.

azinman2 7 hours ago

27 is really good. Worth the upgrade.

Disclosure: I work at Apple. But that’s also my honest opinion.

yreg 6 hours ago

One issue with upgrading: macOS 27 doesn't run Xcode 26 which most developers probably want to continue using until they finish polishing the apps for Duo.

HumblyTossed 6 hours ago

You're right, it is. But there's some annoying caveats. Parental Controls - every device has to be on 27 or nobody gets the updates. Have an iPad mini 5 that we let the youngest use, so that messes with everything.

HumblyTossed 6 hours ago

> But the requirement for everyone to have an ipad or iphone on 27.2 or later (for full functionality) seems more of a showstopper. I would have been in the market for one but haven’t even bothered to upgrade past iOS 18 yet.

This is what irritates me about Parental Controls in 27. Everyone has to be on 27 or nobody gets the new controls. So, we still have a mini 5 that we let the littlest one on. It works, there's not reason to get a new one, but sure would be nice to have the newer Parental Controls for the older kids.

dewey 8 hours ago

Also all the developers are angry and trying to build for Duo right now that didn’t even give them a simulator in time, so makes sense to not rush this out right away.

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

For what it is worth, this seems to have a similar screen form factor to the expanded to Duo, so maybe they were waiting for this announcement before revealing the simulator to make it clearer that apps supporting one of the devices may support both? Not the first time Apple has made multi-device plays on a new form factor.

Kwpolska an hour ago

The HomeView has a 1:1 display, the Duo has 1:1.4 displays. Not really similar. Although I would expect any devs (had there been a SDK) to start with their iPad apps, which are expected to adapt to different window sizes.

jimbokun 2 hours ago

They’ll get over it if the Duo sells well.

vscarpenter 8 hours ago

I think the Watch is a better precedent than the Apple TV. The product page already borrows its vocabulary: customizable faces, Live Activities, and “compatible third-party audio and video apps from your iPhone.” That’s how WatchKit started in 2015. Third-party Watch apps ran as extensions on the paired iPhone, went native with watchOS 2 later that year, and didn’t get an on-device App Store until watchOS 6 in 2019.

So I wouldn’t expect a HomeView App Store soon. I’d expect iPhone-hosted extensions first (widgets, Live Activities, CarPlay-style templates for audio and video), probably at WWDC. That also spares developers who are already scrambling to support the Duo.

Gareth321 8 hours ago

I strongly agree. Lack of support for Plexamp is a dealbreaker for me. At minimum they're going to need to support Spotify or they'll kill the product. I think it will probably need YouTube support as well. There is a worryingly sparse amount of information published about what it will support.

10729287 8 hours ago

Well, plexamp is a dealbreaker for Apple that more and more wants you to buy Apple Music and all their services. They have more to lose by opening to plexamp users, who are not the more prone to spend money, or other services, than to lock users in their very own walled garden. Open source software on consumer friendly hardware is the way now.

Brendinooo 7 hours ago

I don't know if that's obviously true. I'm sure Plexamp is small potatoes compared to how many are on Apple Music, and there's a solid chance that anyone running a Plex server is doing it on a Mac.

phoghed 8 hours ago

obviously supporting more platforms would be better, but they do have >100 million Apple Music subscribers according to this estimate: https://musically.com/2026/06/17/music-business-ended-2025-w...

al_borland 7 hours ago

Does it lack support? It says it supports various apps from the App Store or phone, so it might work.

I was surprised when I tried using Plexamp with Siri in my car and it worked (this was with the old Siri, not even the new one).

Brendinooo 6 hours ago

On the specs page it says:

Apps Available from iPhone:

- Audiobooks

- Classical Music

- News

- TV

Underneath that it says "Supported third-party audio and video apps". I'm not sure what that means.

But yeah! Plexamp works fine with Siri on my phone.

FireBeyond 6 hours ago

There was something that implied that it was using CarPlay somewhere in the stack.

rconti 7 hours ago

Yep. I'm afraid they're going to "require" that you use Apple Music and HomePods to be useful. I'm pretty interested in trying the product, but that depends on Sonos and Spotify support at minimum.

tokioyoyo 8 hours ago

There’s a potential argument that’s brewing how software moat is null, distribution is still hard-to-impossible to crack. A company, could, spin up software very easily by monitoring the requests of the existing clients that have purchased the hardware. Having such teams that push out software would be valuable, as you’d get a complete walled garden experience. Would be hard to pull off though, as your marketing team needs to be insanely good at convincing people that the product itself is valuable.

yohannparis 8 hours ago

home.app already has an intercom feature that can play to all devices in the home.

phoghed 8 hours ago

And indeed on the first set of images of the device there is an intercom tile.

uptown 8 hours ago

Apple Home already has a Walkie-Talkie feature.

Brendinooo 7 hours ago

Huh, interesting! I opened up my Home app and didn't see anything obvious. I'll have to look into what I need to use it...

blokey 7 hours ago

Press the wavy-lined icon on the left at the top right cluster of three icons. Or ask Siri to "Intercom <stuff>" and it'll pipe it out the speakers (and peoples phones if they set that enabled!)

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

Walkie Talkie has a dedicated "app" icon on WatchOS and I wonder how much more it would be used by people if iOS and iPadOS offered a more obvious link pinnable to the Home Screen like WatchOS.

isodev 7 hours ago

Same, all of the apps they demo in the video are not useful in my family - we use a different messenger, different calendar, different video calling app... it's not just about the App Store, if it's supposed to integrate with house things (there was the doorbell camera in the video) it needs to work with "homes" from other vendors, not just HomeKit.

Also, I believe that form factor was tried by both Meta and Google and didn't really click with people - who has so much free space near a power socket... in the kitchen ... in the morning ... lol.

Cyph0n 7 hours ago

Give us a Home Assistant integration and watch these sell like hotcakes :)

a10c 3 hours ago

Yep. I'd pre-order 3 today if i could get it with first class HomeAssistant app support.

joezydeco 7 hours ago

The intro video does an excellent job of hiding the fact that this needs a power cord. There's one quick shot shows a hole drilled into the middle of the kitchen island to provide access to the USB-C cord.

al_borland 7 hours ago

I was looking for the power cord as well, and required actually looking for it.

I’m curious about the wall mounted option, and how that gets power without an electrician running a line to the middle of the wall. It looked like there might be a PoE option, but that also needs cable run. It seems like a bit of a project.

reaperducer 6 hours ago

I’m curious about the wall mounted option, and how that gets power without an electrician running a line to the middle of the wall.

People wall-mount flat screen TVs without an electrician all the time, and it's no big deal. Because of its size, this should be even simpler.

isodev 6 hours ago

That only works if you live in a paper house. Drilling through normal brick/concrete walls is not that easy - we do call someone when we need our wall mounted TV setup.

reaperducer 2 hours ago

I doubt you live in a house where every single wall is brick or concrete. Unless you live in a nuclear bunker.

I live in a concrete building, and only the exterior walls and one or two interior walls are concrete. The rest is normal walls that for some reason you refer to as "paper." I guess they don't have lumber in your country.

You're just inventing problems where none exist.

xattt 6 hours ago

> It looked like there might be a PoE option, but that also needs cable run

“Power Mount PoE Wired” is an option that will be available in early 2027. I can already see this being a decent option for kitchens that had a wall phone plate (that, hopefully, was wired with Cat 5e…).

Paired with some yet-to-be-released homeOS VoIP app… chefs kiss.

joezydeco 5 hours ago

homeOS VoIP app

Like FaceTime?

xattt 5 hours ago

Like something that would integrate with an existing SIP server like FreePBX.

atourgates 7 hours ago

My life is basically the family in this ad, and I just have a hard time imagining how one of these would make anything better.

Everyone in our family who sould have access to calendars/facetime/messages/etc. already does. It's overkill for just a smart speaker.

I guess maybe the kids who are too young to have their own device could more easily call their grandparents?

Cool hardware and a surprisingly affordable price, I just don't have a use case for it.

EDIT: The wall mounted version seems like a better form-factor though. Doesn't take up counter/table space at least.

redanddead 7 hours ago

>home, always on recording

It’s not surprising they made it cheap

They’re trying to compete with all the other creepy Flock-at-Home brands

Its only purpose is to disrupt competitors

fhn 7 hours ago

always on recording means you are the product and they can train off of you and be even more embedded in your life.

Brendinooo 6 hours ago

Apple has a better track record in this regard, do you have any recent evidence that this trust is unfounded?

saaaaaam 7 hours ago

For families who want to reduce screen time and device reliance this could be a very good alternative to everyone having their own device.

chasebank 7 hours ago

wait until someone designs an old school wireless home phone to connect to it. we'll come full circle.

oreoftw 6 hours ago

Something like this https://tincan.kids/?

shafyy 6 hours ago

This already exists: https://flipply.co.uk/

conductr 3 hours ago

Tincans are huge right now with the elementary age kids at least (my 2nd grader is my only frame of reference)

ethbr1 6 hours ago

Like some sort of shared communication device that's larger, sits on a counter, and is plugged into the wall?

What a novel idea.

saaaaaam 6 hours ago

Fax machine? Genuinely not sure what you mean. Is the answer just "a computer" ?

Because while yes, that's true, this apparently recognises the different users. So presumably if a child is using it, that will be under managed parameters set by a parent - meaning that it's much harder for the child to circumvent.

siva7 4 hours ago

They likely refer to a classic landline phone..

rickyc091 4 hours ago

Yeah, the grandparents scenario was exactly why I immediately bought it. Younger kids with limited screen time. The grandparents call our phones to talk to them and vice versa. I'm curious how this will work for my kids who don't have apple devices/accounts.

We're old school and use a dry erase board on the fridge for our calendar, so a centralized device would be nice. We tried using an old iPad, but it was more clunky to turn it on, click on the app each time. We did try kiosk mode, but it was terrible when we needed the device for something else.

fhn 7 hours ago

"My kids are always stealing my iPad to run the Toybox 3D printer; this would be a great thing for them to use." Is it? Why not get them a iPad instead?

Brendinooo 7 hours ago

iPads cost more, and it really doesn't get much use in our house otherwise.

tyre 5 hours ago

Do very old (like 5+ years old) iPads cost more than $300? Seems like you wouldn't need constant OS updates for their use case but idk.

swiftcoder 6 hours ago

> if this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me

This was one of the stumbling blocks that really put the final nail in Meta's Portal. You could call your friends on messenger or WhatsApp, but no 3rd party story for FaceTime, Zoom, Google... was a real problem for most folks

popupeyecare 6 hours ago

I believe it supports carplay compatible apps.

According to Wired, “a handful of third-party media apps like Spotify are available, and developers can bring over existing CarPlay apps.”

cube00 6 hours ago

> Music in the kitchen, sure, but I run Plexamp.

As much as I like Apple hardware I know unless I'm willing to go full Apple on hardware and services (eg. Apple Music in this example) I'm always going to have a mid experience trying to be on the fence of their walled garden.

mmmlinux 6 hours ago

they already provide intercom with the homepods, its not great, but it exists.

tyromaniac 6 hours ago

> former intercom

Do you live in a former schoolhouse, or Uma Thurman's place from pulp fiction?

gnarlouse 6 hours ago

intercom systems were pretty ubiquitous in the 90's and 00's...

0x457 3 hours ago

House I used to rent had intercom in every room and CD player that plays in whole house via those intercomes. It didn't work, but i but in early 00s that was major reason to brag.

danudey 6 hours ago

> this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me

From their page:

"Additional apps. HomeView supports compatible third-party audio and video apps from your iPhone for a familiar experience across devices"

This implies that Plexamp could be supported, and possibly Messenger and Snapchat calls, but it's too early to tell.

> My house has a bunch of spots on the wall where an old intercom system used to live: it'd obviously be a budget buster to buy a bunch of these to fit in those slots but even if you did, you'd need Apple to provide an intercom solution (a la the Watch's Walkie-Talkie?) or you're...out of luck.

Apple Home already provides this. It's not a full voice chat, but you can tap a thing and say something and it'll broadcast it to the rest of the house; in my case, that's two HomePods Mini, but it's easy to assume it will include this as well.

If you're just looking to say "Hey kids, dinner's ready" or "We have to leave in 15 minutes" to the entire house then that circumstance is handled already; if you want to have a back-and-forth conversation with someone in another room, though, it doesn't do that (yet?).

flanz_10 4 hours ago

It sounds like it'll be integrating with the call and widget apis. Right now, you can redirect any voice call that uses the system call UI to your homepod. Adding video, maybe?

tyre 5 hours ago

Homepods have intercom support.

What's also crazy is that they can detect fire alarms, will alert your iPhone, and then can pipe both sound and voice to the HomePod. It announces that it's going to do so, so it's not a privacy nightmare.

Pretty cool. I didn't know it existed until it happened. (Thankfully nothing bad.)

xd1936 9 hours ago

Through the incredible power of Siri AI™, you can now get a "I didn't understand that. Do you want to search the web for 'turn on the kitchen lights'?" response faster than ever before.

kriz9 8 hours ago

I don't think this joke works anymore. Siri uses Gemini now.

buzzerbetrayed 8 hours ago

Gemini backed Siri sucks too though. The frequency in which it just.. does nothing, is crazy. Joke still works.

macintux 8 hours ago

Yep, I really wish I could revert to previous-Siri on my iPhone 15 Pro. Old Siri was reasonably predictable and faster. New Siri is slower, more ambitious, and fails more often.

deinonychus 3 hours ago

you can. i just did it on my 17 pro and my watch. i get instant timers again. it's unreal we lost this technology.

go to settings > siri > and turn off siri entirely. it doesn't break anything. then turn it back on, and they give you the option for siri AI or old dumb siri.

enjoy :)

macintux 3 hours ago

Thank you very much. Whew.

geuis 8 hours ago

so responses like "I've turned on the lights", but you're still standing in the dark. That's my anecdotal level of interactions with any Gemini model.

darkstar999 8 hours ago

Gemini can be pretty bad on my Pixel phone and Nest speakers.

longtimelistnr 8 hours ago

It's still unbelievably limited and lackluster

joshstrange 6 hours ago

Correct, it's not faster. Now it's slower to the point you aren't sure if it's ever going to work, then it comes back with some error.

Sure, it stopped being quite a stupid as before but it's not the nirvana they were promising, checks notes, 3+ years ago.

So it doesn't have the same issues as old Siri, just new issues.

edot 3 hours ago

Yes, it’s insanely slow now. So bad, I unenrolled from the beta. I mostly use Siri for reminders and alarms and somehow it was spending upwards of 5 seconds on the new Siri AI to do these tasks. Unusable.

joshstrange 2 hours ago

> I mostly use Siri for reminders and alarms

Ahh yes, the only 2 things I can trust it for. The same tasks that now take longer and fail more often. I guess it understands me a little better but it's been rough. Also I see they left in the fun bugs of:

Me: "Siri, set a reminder for 1pm for XYZ"

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

iPhone: No indication of anything done or Siri still waiting, looks like it just gave up

Me: "Siri, set a reminder for 1pm for XYZ"

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

Siri: ....

Siri: "Ok, I've set your reminder"

_1 pm rolls around_

2 reminders fire...

karussell 6 hours ago

I wonder if they use Gemini how can the promise "Private for all" be fulfilled? Local model like gemma4?

avree 3 hours ago

Because they don't "use Gemini".

"These new capabilities are powered by the next generation of Apple Foundation Models, custom-built in collaboration with Google and its Gemini models for deeply integrated Apple Intelligence experiences. "

rolosa 8 hours ago

Hey siri, turn off my tv

"Did you mean your device labeled "tv"?"

Yes Siri ffs that's literally the only device called "tv" I have

ben_w 7 hours ago

- Alarm goes off

- "Hey siri, stop alarm"

- Alarm stops

- Meanwhile, the HomePod in a different room chimes in with "Turn off the alarm on Ben's iPhone XR?", pauses for a while then checks in to see if I heard it the first time

The HomePod has now been unplugged.

graypegg 6 hours ago

I have an original homepod, and man, I wish I could lobotomize it easily.

It's a really nice speaker if I set it on something sturdy that won't rattle, and airplay is still pretty good even on ancient devices.

I can't keep it plugged in because it will just randomly say "You can enable personalized responses in the settings app!" at 3am about once a week if I do. It's horrifying when it happens because it always seems to be 10x louder than I remember it being set to.

jimbokun 2 hours ago

Probably because ambient noise is so much less at 3am.

singularity2001 6 hours ago

"There are no alarms ringing." I kid you not, that's the latest tick when I want to stop alarms with three devices in the room.

cr1895 4 hours ago

>The HomePod has now been unplugged.

Mine are now unplugged after the update to 27 while i'm not home, since they've developed a mind of their own & will randomly turn on the TV or play music themselves.

jimbokun 2 hours ago

Well they get bored if not given enough stimulation.

elpakal 8 hours ago

"I will answer that for you when you put down the knife"

Sir_Twist 5 hours ago

"Here's what I found on the web for 'Open the pod bay doors.'"

waterheater 6 hours ago

Separating the camera and microphone data processing functionality into a Secure Exclave should be seen as a genuinely important step forward to protecting privacy, not just implementing data control schemes which masquerade under the name of "privacy." This approach should be the norm moving forward, as cameras and microphones provide the biggest issues for privacy.

With this established, it becomes possible to envision a Secure Exclave which handles data from _all_ device sensors, not just cameras and microphones. The Secure Exclave will contain all sensor data processing functions, which will feed the information to the OS. With the processing capabilities of sensor data being unalterable by any web-connected actor, and by building a physical interface for processing capability updating, unwelcome perception becomes impossible, thereby solving the privacy problem.

MattDamonSpace 6 hours ago

Yeah Apple does it right. It’s why I was desperate for them to get Siri AI out: people are going to use these services and if Apple’s privacy-focused version isn’t ready, people will use unsafe and untrustworthy vendors instead

mithr 7 hours ago

I can't believe they haven't redesigned the Home app interface! I've always thought it was pretty terrible UX-wise and looked like they just threw together a very basic UI to have some support for home automation. I always expected they'd get around to formulating an actual design perspective for what a good-looking smart home control interface may look like, and this seemed like a perfect opportunity for that. I guess not.

That being said, I still think this is cool, and I'm glad Apple's spending more effort in this area. I won't replace my custom HA dashboard with it at this point, but may get my parents one.

doctoboggan 7 hours ago

I was also really hoping they’d release a completely redesigned Apple home app. The current one is simply not that good.

deinonychus 3 hours ago

man i can't believe there's no new home app. why on earth would i buy a homepad if i can't even meaningfully control my hue smart lights without requiring the manufacturer's app.

troupo 6 hours ago

Why don't you like 15000 entries dumped at you at once? With just three options for automation? Oh, I meant scenes. Oh, I meant Shortcuts, that may or may not do something.

timpera 9 hours ago

> Apple HomeView is not available for sale in the European Union, as Siri AI is currently unavailable in iOS in the EU. Apple is working constructively with the EU in an attempt to find a path forward.

It's interesting that they consider that this product would be unusable without Siri AI. I've used a Google Nest Hub for years, and I don't think it needs AI to be useful?

WesolyKubeczek 9 hours ago

This means it’s plainly unusable.

maxsilver 9 hours ago

Yeah, it's weird, the AI is the least interesting and least useful part of this product.

Apple basically made a HomePod mini that is also a Skylight - https://myskylight.com/calendar - and it's even competitively priced.

They could turn off all AI (turn off all of Siri even) and this would be one of the best products in the market.

joshstrange 9 hours ago

Hmm, the first thing I thought when I saw the Skylight is "Can I run Home Assistant on this?" and it looks like the answer is: yes https://github.com/dinewby88/SkylightMaxCalendarADB

vablings 7 hours ago

HomeKit and HAOS also bridge quite well together so same applies here I guess just an apple front end

joshstrange 5 hours ago

HA's bridge to HomeKit is decent, but the Home app is miserable to use and flakey. It seems a strong breeze will break everything and re-setting-up 100+ devices is not something I enjoy doing.

jawilson2 8 hours ago

Interesting, the calendar2 has a header that says "Designed to Delight", and the new apple page says "Delight Up the House". That CAN'T be a coincidence...

10729287 9 hours ago

They want the EU to be the bad guy that prevents citizens to get all the nice stuff they release.

walthamstow 7 hours ago

When in fact EU iOS is the only one that is even semi usable

mahboi 6 hours ago

At least the EU killed Lightning, worst charger ever

MattDamonSpace 6 hours ago

Apple was already shipping USB-C devices before the EU got involved

Thank god the EU didn’t get it’s shit together before usb-c, the original proposal was to require microUSB lol

mahboi 6 hours ago

They were shipping USB-C MacBooks since 2016, plus the iPad Pro at some point. All those years they didn't bring it to iPhone, so I don't see any indication that they were going to do it, unless someone at Apple knows.

Also tbh I would have preferred micro-usb over Lightning. Non-reversible, but it at least would've charged my phone reliably.

juiceland an hour ago

You think Apple was not looking to sell people replacement accessories?

r0fl 9 hours ago

Maybe Apple just doesn't care to put up with the silly EU rules.

poisonborz 9 hours ago

Which of the rules specifically do you find silly?

r0fl 8 hours ago

Specifically, Article 6(7) of the EU's Digital Markets Act, which forces Apple to give competing companies access to the same hardware and software capabilities it uses itself.

The EU's interpretation means Apple must provide third-party AI assistants with access comparable to Siri's, potentially including the ability to interact with messages, files, purchases and other apps.

Apple proposed a secure intermediary called Trusted System Agent and an 18-month implementation plan. The European Commission rejected those proposals.

xbar 8 hours ago

Chat Control and backdoors.

layer8 7 hours ago

No such rules exist.

maxhille 7 hours ago

I wonder if there will be proper answers - looks like some Yandex centers still chew out anti-EU propaganda...

233mhz 9 hours ago

> It's interesting that they consider that this product would be unusable without Siri AI.

They might be perfectly useable but not profitable enough

joshstrange 9 hours ago

The rumor is that this has been ready for 1-2 years and was waiting on "good Siri" before they would/could release it. So it follows that if they aren't releasing "good Siri" in the EU that this device wouldn't be available.

fosron 8 hours ago

i would love a dashboard for my smart home, but even as a fanboy of Apple i feel like HomeView doesnt do much, i'll just buy an eink screen, attach a esp32 of sorts and have it the way i want it without additional mics and shit

artisinal 8 hours ago

The Google Nest Hub is legal in the EU because you can install whatever AI agent you want on it.

https://support.google.com/googlehome/thread/467705013/intro...

lxgr 8 hours ago

Really? I have one, but I'm not aware of a way to swap out Google Home/Gemini for anything else.

lxgr 7 hours ago

Looks nice, unfortunately I'll have to stick with however Google's alternative is currently called since Google Cast is the strictly better model for these types of devices in my view, compared to Airplay.

Google Cast runs the player on the cast target and only uses the device that initiates playback as an optional remote control that can be disconnected without interrupting streaming.

Airplay requires the controlling device to remain available throughout, in my experience; receiving a phone call, watching other media etc. on my phone isn't possible without interrupting playback. (This might have changed in one of the last versions, but that needs app support, and not knowing what to expect on a per app basis is at least as bad, if not worse.)

HaloZero 7 hours ago

I will say my experience making a chromecast custom app though has been painful. It's fine to just send media though.

I tried multiple ways, contacted their support and they just kept me trying to do the same thing over and over again. For some reason I could not register my device with my development account. Tried multiple SDKs to get it to work, just ran into the same isue.

secretsatan 7 hours ago

Chromecast used to support streaming from the casting device, i make an app that used to use it. Sadly they no longer support that feature. Having everything on your device allows considerable more freedom.

lxgr 6 hours ago

It's definitely still possible since effectively the cast device just runs a (display-less, in case of speakers) browser instance navigating to some URL and communicating with the remote using a message passing API, right? You can display whatever you want in that URL, including HTML media elements playing back HLS or MPEG-DASH streams.

I believe they used to have some default receiver app implementations that you could just send a media URL and they'd play that back; is that what they removed?

Mindwipe 7 hours ago

Fwiw both Airplay and Google Cast support both modes of operation.

But frankly Apple's developer documentation sucks around this, and unsurprisingly people don't understand what's going on when even developers don't.

lxgr 5 hours ago

Given that not even Spotify supports it, Apple can't be very serious about it. I can't be the only one who considers that a dealbreaker for a HomePod.

Darwins_Toffees 9 hours ago

It's not even a very functional size. Honestly makes me go why not just get a phone charging mount by my HomePod in the kitchen and save $300. Plus add on a mount and charger and it's $400. No thanks

vessenes 9 hours ago

This is a nice design, and a very aggressive price. I like the design enough I'm interpreting that price as a sign Apple's serious about getting these into a lot of homes.. I wasn't thinking I'd buy one of these, but I changed my mind looking at the pitch -- at this price it's sort of a 'hmm, I could imagine wanting one of those in X room'.

I'm curious if this is intended to act as a matter hub -- right now a lot of that load is shouldered by an Apple TV 4K if you've got one. Anyway, apple's home automation story has been terrible for ten years, but this device makes me think they will make another serious run in the next five.

modeless 7 hours ago

$299 is aggressive? Nest Hub is $99.

ShakataGaNai 6 hours ago

Its the same price as an Apple TV 4K, 4th gen. Which is twice the price of the previous generation.

RAMpocalypse sucks.

itintheory 4 hours ago

Nest Hub was $99, and is now perpetually out of stock. AFAICT it's discontinued. Which is strange, and a shame, because it's a great product. People are paying similar prices for digital picture frames with a cloud service, which the nest hub can do with a little bit of config, and a bunch more.

turtlebits 3 hours ago

Nest hub also likely does little locally and sends everything to Google.

paulpan 7 hours ago

Feels like the wrong approach. Why not just create a docking station for the iPad and a software docking view? Identical to Google's approach with the Pixel Tablet but Apple's superior will be more refined. It even uses the A18 SoC!

At $299 this feels like a very niche product with limited functionality.

al_borland 7 hours ago

They’d have to make iPadOS multiuser, which they’ve been avoiding for 16 years, despite constant requests from the user base.

mahboi 6 hours ago

$299 makes me think they want to sell something at-cost or at loss to get people onto services more. And it's intentionally gimped to not compete with any of their more expensive products.

tkdb 7 hours ago

Nice very Apple-esque thrust to unify and refine a chaotic field of tech into an elegant experience.

I cannot fathom how this will deliver on the vision when Siri, even the new gemini-under-the-hood Siri, is still maddeningly, bafflingly worthless. To be fair, Gemini, for a consumer of the google ecosystem, is also maddeningly, bafflingly worthless. So we use ChatGPT or Claude, with extremely limited access to the tiny little shortcuts that stack up and make absolute magic for the personal AI assistant.

cromka 8 hours ago

The product ad (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkrYiZ_g9tw) is amazing, honestly, and I can't think of any other brand that has this kind of "feeling". Most other just copy this style, like Google or Microsoft, but they just don't have the "coolness". And I am not saying Apple is the ultimate cool, just that from all big tech, they're consistently the best of them.

modeless 7 hours ago

Production values are high but I don't see how this is any good as an advertisement. This family is not aspirational. They're arguing and sniping at each other like a sitcom with no laugh track. The only nice thing about them is their house. Realistic, maybe, but realism doesn't make me want the product.

footydude 4 hours ago

> Realistic, maybe, but realism doesn't make me want the product.

Relatable is probably what they are going for here.

Essentially the angle they seem to be going for is...have you got a busy household with lots going on like these guys? Look how much our new product can help make everything a bit easier/bit better.

Personally I would take an ad with a 'relatable' family over an 'aspirational' one, but I do take your point - the level of snark in that ad is pretty high.

(Also - disclaimer...my household reality is nothing like as frantic as shown, but I deliberate seek to have day to day family live running at a much slower pace than a lot of people seem to want to/aspire to)

alanwreath 6 hours ago

the ad did a good job of displaying all the features of the new device, of course it left out the parts I would have liked as a parent who's already dealt with these types of devices. I mean apple had the benefit of 20/20 vision and could have looked into blocking little kids from just going to it to watch YouTube. It could have also solved the issue that dad's around the world would have united against: locking who gets to set the thermostat.

that said, also what's with the kids being disrespectful, untruthful, dismissive, and patronizing (in that order) to their parents...I bet these kids were a joy to be around as toddlers and will continue to be so as "formed" adults

cromka 5 hours ago

The snarkiness is just typical American ad style, like 80% of ads are like this, even simple three sentence exchanges. It's actually quite fascinating, because it stands out from any other culture's advertising I know.

I think it was started by the American sitcom culture, the sharp witted, but also confrontational, borderline aggressive comebacks. I am not an expert but I feel like Cheers might have pioneered it?

tqi an hour ago

Funny, I had the opposite reaction to the ad. The whole sequence felt forced, and if these are the best use cases they could come up with (looking up recipes, using findmy, asking for factoids, checking calendars) theres very little reason why someone would opt for this vs just using their phone.

$300 is a compelling price, but I have a hard time imaging this being successful.

throw03172019 9 hours ago

I don’t really understand why we need this. Why another screen? iPhones, iPads, Mac’s and now another one for the kitchen.

10729287 9 hours ago

Because they want to get every single friction out of your life.

Telemakhos 9 hours ago

"Friction" and "life" are weird ways of spelling "dollar" and "pocket."

10729287 9 hours ago

Phase 1 : Get every friction out of customer's life Phase 2 : ? Phase 3 : Profit

A braindead customer is a better customer.

righthand 9 hours ago

Apple (and all of big tech) doesn't want a moment of your life to exist where you're not mindlessly staring into an screen.

hagbard_c 9 hours ago

You may not need it but the fruit factory does need it, if only to sell more fruit machines.

alex_suzuki 9 hours ago

> Ask Siri AI to recommend a new coffee shop

that’s why, obviously!</s>

dmix 9 hours ago

How many people carry their laptop around and put it on their kitchen counter when they cook?

233mhz 9 hours ago

Why would anyone do that in the first place is the real question

klausa 9 hours ago

So I can view the recipe in trying to cook?

iAMkenough 9 hours ago

How did you do it before today?

klausa 9 hours ago

Just to be clear, I’m not usually using my laptop for this (though I have done before!), but it seemed like a pretty obvious usecase to me.

iAMkenough 8 hours ago

Rather than turn your old devices into more e-waste, this is also a good reuse case for them, if you haven’t already.

alerighi 7 hours ago

You can... print it? Or write it down on a piece of paper, or better a book, with a pen, like everyone did till phones and computers were invented?

righthand 9 hours ago

And what's wrong with moving a laptop around? They're designed to do that. The keyboard and trackpad give you great tactile control of what you're doing.

klausa 9 hours ago

They’re not very well designed to be used with dirty and wet hands, and cooking frequently involves both.

righthand 9 hours ago

Can't you use Siri to have a hands-free mode on an Apple laptop?

walthamstow 7 hours ago

They're usually big enough to view the whole recipe, unless you got it from some trash website on the first page of Google

ben_w 9 hours ago

How many don't carry their phone?

nsxwolf 9 hours ago

I don't enjoy figuring out how to stand it up, or having the screen constantly lock. And I don't want to buy accessories or mess with settings to fix this.

_aavaa_ 9 hours ago

> And I don't want to buy accessories or mess with settings to fix this.

Why is an accessory unacceptable but a new device is fine?

nsxwolf 9 hours ago

Because its a fixture.

jermaustin1 8 hours ago

Glue down a mag safe phone charger stand.

nsxwolf 6 hours ago

I don’t want a phone charger stand to be a fixture.

ben_w 4 hours ago

Okay, but this is functionally equivalent to, and quite possibly literally the same hardware as, a phone glued to a phone charger.

jon-wood 9 hours ago

And yet from what I can see on the product page this thing doesn't have video apps on it, and doesn't work as an Airplay video target, so you still end up with a laptop/iPad on the kitchen counter.

AlanYx 8 hours ago

Is this really a good solution for cooking though? The grid of holes for the speakers in the main column are going to get clogged with food spatters in no time, and they wouldn't be easy to clean. An iPad I can understand, since you can just wipe it off.

233mhz 9 hours ago

I gave up with these questions, some people will consume and buy anything offered to them. I know obese people who do 0 sport and 0 effort to improve yet buy $800+ apple watch ultra for """health""" reasons...

Make it shiny enough, give people an easy way to rationalise the purchase and they'll buy your shit.

sudofail 9 hours ago

One personal use case is I have my home set up with smart lights. My family can control the lights from our phones, but friends and extended family cannot. Having a dedicated device like this gives others the ability to control home automations too.

user43928 9 hours ago

Their video ad wasn't convincing either. It was about a family chatting in the kitchen and using the device in the middle of it.

It seemed incredibly fake to me, and I couldn't identify a single interesting use case.

ralusek 6 hours ago

I thought the "ping my keys" was cool until I took out my phone and asked Siri to "ping my keys" and it worked (I do have the iOS beta with the newer Siri fwiw if you try and it doesn't work).

bombcar an hour ago

I wish the AirTag made a noise that was locatable instead of seeming to come from everywhere at once

maidaman 9 hours ago

This would actually be helpful in the kitchen for following recipes, but the screen is too small.

mkirsten 9 hours ago

It's not designed as a product you need. Neither is iPad or Apple Watch.

jasode 9 hours ago

>Why another screen?

One of the motivations is to have a "master controller and dashboard" for the (smart-) home that's conveniently always attached and connected to the house itself.

Consider that many houses already have wall-mounted control panels in the main hallway or kitchen for the burglar alarm or thermostat. Replace that with an all-in-one smarthome touchscreen that configures the same security system as well as everything else ... HVAC, lights, blinds, door cam video feed, etc.

Examples of that concept from other home automation companies such as Crestron, Savant, Control4, etc:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Crestron+home+touchscreen+ho...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Savant+touchscreen+home&tbm=...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Control4+touchscreen+home&tb...

Apple's product marketing pages for HomeView at the moment don't heavily promote the idea of customized programming for home automations (HomeKit API) to compete with Crestron/Savant but many observers think Apple wants to expand into that space. (https://www.apple.com/home-app/)

A lot of homeowners don't want to be locked in with Crestron/Savant. Yes, Apple is itself also a "walled garden" but it's a more palatable lock-in situation than the ridiculous re-programming fees that Crestron dealers charge for every little change.

sdgluck 9 hours ago

Didn't even occur to me to look for a purpose-built smart home console. I just mounted an old iPad to the wall.

jasode 8 hours ago

>Didn't even occur to me to look for a purpose-built smart home console.

Sorry for not being clear. The Crestron/Savant panels are not typically purchased separately as 1 item. They're installed by certified system integrators as part of a total package where they wire up the whole house (often new construction).

There have been rumblings and predictions that Apple could expand HomeKit's capabilities to eventually be a real alternative to Crestron/Savant. The previous iterations of HomePod and Apple TV acting as a home hub really wasn't a credible threat but a new product like HomeView is a step closer to the "professional smarthome automation" space. E.g. Apple offering a wall-mounted PoE option is evidence of that.

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

Yeah, a lot of people are using old iPads for this sort of thing. That seems to be the biggest competitor to HomeView is "old iPad mounted somewhere". The multi-user Face ID seems a big differentiator in that competition and might for some be a good reason to upgrade that old iPad to something newer.

ex1fm3ta 9 hours ago

unless you are not into home automation you cannot understand how useful this is. Years ago I bought a slightly broken Ipad Pro just to hang it on the wall and control my lights. But I agree the screen size is not right. I cant do shit besides listening to music

pjmlp 9 hours ago

According to ATP Podcast occasional rants, Apple home devices aren't really the quality at premium price.

pjmlp 9 hours ago

Because they need new customers.

tencentshill 2 hours ago

How does the wallmount work? It's powered by a USB C port on the back, is there even a wiring standard for in-wall 20W USB? It would need something like this to function on an existing PoE network. https://store.ui.com/us/en/products/uacc-adapter-poe-usbc but it only goes up to 10W. Can it even use the wired networking half of such a setup?

usernametaken29 6 hours ago

> Private for all

Literally the first thing that I thought opening this was: “oh great even more spyware in my home” haha. Sure, let’s mount every centimetre with cameras and smart TVs. Even if we buy the premise that there’s no bad intentions, negligence, incompetence and malignant actors can use every iot device as another vector to bug you…

nphardon 6 hours ago

that's all i see as well: self surveillance. when I read other comments like "the family in this ad is exactly like mine" or "oh if it had app store access then itd be great" it makes me think of that scott alexander essay "i can tolerate anything except the outgroup" where he makes the analogy of living side by side with people who exist in entirely separate and impenetrable social bubbles, like light and dark matter.

tencentshill 2 hours ago

That's exactly why it needs to be Apple. You can lock this thing down to your LAN and firewall everything off and it will still function. Try that with any google device.

santah 9 hours ago

It's shocking to me it doesn't support apps from the AppStore nor any kind of (video) media streaming.

Otherwise looks like an ideal kitchen TV/Movie playback device.

mkirsten 9 hours ago

Looks like a terrible TV/Movie playback device. But potentially a nice device to quickly glance at information, or show information based on what you ask

santah 9 hours ago

It could've been wide screen I agree.

Again, dumbfounded they completely passed on this use-case ...

10729287 9 hours ago

Seems like a great way to sell you the homeview two times.

righthand 9 hours ago

Finally a device to watch movies in the comfort of my kitchen...

jon-wood 9 hours ago

I wouldn't watch a movie in my kitchen but I regularly watch YouTube or a TV show on an iPad while cooking or cleaning.

jon-wood 9 hours ago

I was so ready to buy one of these things on day one to replace the iPad that awkwardly sits on the side in my kitchen and they completely missed that relatively simple target. All I really want is a device that will accept AirPlay video in my kitchen with a decent speaker or two.

SomeonesAccount 8 hours ago

I wonder if this works as a screen mirroring device, so you could mirror your iPad to this device. Wouldn't work very well, but that might be a way to watch media

mciancia 8 hours ago

I would expect not, because why would it?

SomeonesAccount 8 hours ago

Yeah, I expect not also, but let's say you wanted to watch a video while doing a workout or doing the dishes and you wanted to make it follow you around? (I can't find anywhere whether or not it has a motor to rotate, but that is what was rumored so I am going off of that info)

giarc 7 hours ago

I think it does/will? There's an image of it showing the Pluribus image an S1E1 listing. Unless that is acting as a remote for an Apple TV?

WorldMaker 6 hours ago

That is an image of listening to the Pluribus podcast about Pluribus. It shows that it supports the Podcast app.

But the general impression from a lot of this is HomeView seems to be trying to position itself as something like WatchOS where it hands off stuff to/from a user's iPhones/iPads. So it should likely support apps, but they may be more like Watch apps/faces/complications and CarPlay apps.

anvuong 2 hours ago

Because that would require a lot of RAM for the multi-user switch to work flawlessly. They cheap out and force the processing onto your iPhone. It's a glory square CarPlay screen ..

mleo 8 hours ago

I’ve had one Echo device or multiple around the house since they launched. several years ago I whittled it down to one Echo Show in the kitchen. I like the screen just being there on the counter with timers and easily visible. I can finally retire this ad machine and be Alexa free.

I stopped using the smart home features of echo since it was too cumbersome to go in and readjust all devices for use by one thing or troubleshooting when there was problems. HomeKit is visible across 20 devices used by a family of 5 and made sense to expose all my devices through it.

I just vibe coded the UI and backend services for a 10 inch, soon to be wall mounted, raspberry pi panel integrated with HomeSeer and UniFi. It switches to the door camera automatically when motion is detected. I added a status screen with important items such as state of door locks, washer, dryer, dishwasher and litter boxes. Very bespoke to my house and family. I will have to see what the ongoing cost of maintenance is of my panel vs HomeView device.

Cort3z 3 hours ago

This product seems great to me and my needs. Yes, I can do the same with an e-ink display, linux, claude subscription, and time. But I won't. I would much rather buy a product with minimal setup out of the box. I hope this can become my houses' stationary "land line phone".

bengoodger 2 hours ago

Documentation lists integrations with "select partners" -- and that's why this isn't a serious play for the home. You need to work with everything, like HomeAssistant, Control4, etc. to be a serious contender. They have had years to do this, could have got it all lined up with HomeKit + existing iOS devices. People aren't going to rip out their security system just to integrate with your device. But that would require having a non-adversarial relationship with your developer ecosystem. It's frustrating because home integration software is a wasteland. Those that have succeeded in it have understood it's an ecosystem game.

jungturk an hour ago

Homekit (and the Home iOS app) work just fine with HomeAssistant and most consumer-grade smart home devices (with a focus on Matter).

This device (being a Matter hub) doesn't change any of that.

The fact that they're partnering with select companies on producing sanctioned devices also doesn't change any of that.

cogogo 9 hours ago

I kind of like the idea of this for a home phone replacement and a good way for our family to communicate as we get more comfortable with leaving the kids home alone. But it won’t be able to call 911 and I do not trust it.

Makes me even happier I just installed a red wall phone with an armored cable and signed up for ooma’s cheap plan. 911 access and we have no need for whitelisting. Always have outgoing and default to ringer off. Can turn it on (satisfying slider) if we are leaving the kids for a bit and they can have fun hanging up on any spam while we are out.

SomeonesAccount 9 hours ago

Where does it say it won't be able to call 911?

wpm 9 hours ago

It doesn't have a cell modem. Probably no RJ-11 port either. Can you call 911 with an app?

SomeonesAccount 8 hours ago

Can't iPads call 911 somehow? They don't have a cell modem. I've never really thought about it though...

mikestew 8 hours ago

I can call 911 from my iPad that has neither of those. It runs through my phone via (I assume) some form of Bonjour.

alex_suzuki 7 hours ago

Imagine having to debug your WiFi or Bluetooth while trying to place an emergency call.

cogogo 9 hours ago

I am assuming but as far as I am aware that would be some separate app/service. You need a number that is locally registered so it routes to the correct dispatcher.

SomeonesAccount 8 hours ago

Can't iPads call 911 somehow? They don't have a cell modem. I've never really thought about it though...

cmg 8 hours ago

Even iPads with a cellular modem only have data enabled. Calling anyone, including 911, from an iPad requires some setup of Wi-Fi Calling ahead of time with a paired iPhone on the same Apple account: https://support.apple.com/en-us/108066

noahjk 8 hours ago

I think any HomePod can call 911, so I assume this one will be able to as well, but yeah, it requires an iPhone within connection range. So not for kids left alone unless they have a phone.

yalogin 2 hours ago

Wonder what the real use cases for this are. How often does this get used once the novelty wears off? If they have to resort to “find me a restaurant “ as part of the launch demo, I don’t have a lot of hope for it.

I know Apple will get the security right, no question. So I would use it but not sure it’s worth it. I don’t see a compelling use case personally

mech4bg 2 hours ago

Four things for me are enough:

- Photo frame - Calendar view - Home control - Facetime

It's a bonus that the kids can talk to it for LLM answers too.

yalogin an hour ago

The screen is fixed though. You have to huddle around the device where as the phone can be passed around. Homeschool can be done through Apple TV or iPhone.

dylan-m 9 hours ago

The thing on the stand is goofy, partly because it's like a large Apple Watch. Especially goofy when it's pictured with a hand, and it isn't actually all that big. But their wall mounted design looks interesting, kind of for the same reason? Aesthetically it immediately makes me think of a wall clock, which tells me exactly where it belongs. I kind of feel like they should lead with that one. (Although maybe they should be honest that it obviously needs a power cable).

oldsklgdfth 3 hours ago

The display is small for what it is.

The price is on par with the Amazon Echo Show devices[0]. Why anyone would shell out $300 buck for an Alexa with a screen is beyond me. With the appleHome, at least you can dump your phone and check in on things (not that I would do that either).

In conclusion, it doesn't seem like there's a huge apple premium on this device. Maybe the move is to cut into competing devices with the apple umbrella.

P.S. It would be dope if the display would follow you around in certain situations. Say you're cooking and moving left and right on the counter. With a fixed display, i would keep walking over to look at it, rather than an angle. Moving around the kitchen and looking up to see the thing you need would be dope. (not that I would use that either). But it would be the kind of polish that people dump cash on.