Gemini 3.8 text-to-speech (blog.google)
rcr-anti 2 hours ago
Melatonic 41 minutes ago
deepfriedbits 12 minutes ago
xattt 12 minutes ago
My personal account, 3.6 Flash Lite and 3.5 Thinking.
Meanwhile, I can go hog wild and drain my bank account on GCP. I don’t though, because my family has to eat.
buredoranna 11 minutes ago
just remember: despite they would have you believe they are are a united front... they are better thought of as a "loose federation of warring tribes".
simonw 4 hours ago
I guess voice cloning is widely enough available now from other providers that Google are no longer hesitant to ship it.
Multicomp 4 hours ago
and/or local voice cloning is good enough as is so Google doesn't grant a uniquely liable ability?
gruez 3 hours ago
Probably the latter. Cat's already out of the bag to the extent that you can synthesize with a specific voice in one go and it sounds decent. Even if you need commercial models for better intonation or whatever, you can probably get the commercial models to first generate with a generic voice, then use a local model to transfer that to voice you're cloning. That'll probably get rid of any C2PA watermarks too.
kingstnap 3 hours ago
After some debugging, making a clean dataset with clean recordings, and experimenting with a good fine tune recipe (much props to the new GPT models yesterday being cheaper).
I was able to make a robo-me that sounds absurdly good, family was shocked, all in a matter of a few hours.
So yeah the cat is out of the bag for sure.
yieldcrv 2 hours ago
pixl97 an hour ago
MacNCheese23 an hour ago
It took like 1min - capture something from a youtube or video and put in your own text. It worked also really good for a german test.
Made a voice message for my wife from one of our favorite actors, telling here how nice it would be to make some breakfast :D
throwa356262 3 hours ago
thangalin 4 hours ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAeHgE94rVo
No cloud, no tokens to pay. Reads a book using a full cast of characters. Quotation attribution detection (for my novel) is at 97.2% accuracy (485/499 quotes identified and assigned correctly). The autofill of character voice descriptions uses the prose to determine how the character sounds.
Employs Gemma 4[1] for the prose analysis (voice fills, quotation detection) and Qwen3 TTS Voice Design[2] for creating voice samples. Runs on an 8GB NVIDIA T1000 GPU card, 96 GB RAM, and a AMD Ryzen 5 7600.
[1]: https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/gemma-4/
[2]: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Qwen/Qwen3-TTS-Voice-Design
Multicomp 4 hours ago
The title of the video is 'KeenLore - Emotive Audiobook Creator Demo' and it appears to be a web UI and some local stack that reads text files.
Jordan-117 3 hours ago
loremm 4 hours ago
I understand audiobook narrators often do it, and that's fun. But it's not so critical in my opinion
talon8635 4 hours ago
idiotsecant an hour ago
eru 2 hours ago
Is it possible to annotate your text with extra 'stage directions' that influence how the book is read out?
thangalin 2 hours ago
Good idea, not something I've considered yet. Wouldn't take much to add it since there's already a feature for selecting a quotation and assigning it an intonation. Same infrastructure could be reused to select arbitrary text and assign stage directions.
Multicomp 4 hours ago
Getting GPT-Live to have unique enough voices and to be expressive with how I imagine the voices going in my head is hard to direct, there's not enough control there.
So this Gemini 3.8 specific large voice library and ability to tightly control (if you are willing to write a script) is nice to find, and while I'm not sure which of the 5,286 Gemini products this is, nor how to onboard and get started feeding this my own text files, nor what training will happen to my data if I did somehow use it, I love that the state of the industry is such that Google can do this and release it publicly, because that means eventually an equivalent product can come from someone else and be used locally / confidently that the generated audio or inputs won't be retained and misused.
ghostbrainalpha 4 hours ago
hungryhobbit 4 hours ago
k12sosse 3 hours ago
exhilaration 4 hours ago
Also the Qwen3-TTS demo is cool, you can describe the voice you want: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Qwen/Qwen3-TTS
I came across both on this subreddit, it's very active: https://www.reddit.com/r/TextToSpeech/
I'm personally using this locally: https://github.com/mateogon/pdf-narrator (it's a Python frontend for Kokoro) on my M1 Macbook Air (from 2020, with 8GB RAM) and it's incredible. I make my own audiobooks now - for free!
My favorite voice is am_michael and here's a sample: https://voicerankings.com/voice/kokoro-82M/male/am_michael/s...
throwa356262 2 hours ago
tantalor 15 minutes ago
The original is the best: https://youtu.be/qxWwEPeUuAg
seemaze 4 hours ago
Is there a good browser extension that does this with a flexible TTS backend? I know Qwen, Kokoro, and VibeVoice all have decent quality..
kyrra 4 hours ago
e12e 10 minutes ago
janalsncm 3 hours ago
unglaublich 3 hours ago
It was especially nice during a bike trip along the Rhine, I listened to a lot of the history of the industrial area and its cities.
exhilaration an hour ago
I found all these on this subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TextToSpeech/
I've also see comments like "Microsoft Edge's read-aloud feature is amazing for TTS" but I haven't tried it myself.
Personally I use Kokoro with a python front-end on my Macbook, I linked to it in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49818923 it outputs MP3, so I just copy those to my phone and listen as audiobooks.
simonw 3 hours ago
https://tools.simonwillison.net/gemini-tts-playground#compos...
iAMkenough 3 hours ago
simonloserson 2 hours ago
eis 2 hours ago
simonw 2 hours ago
mohsen1 2 hours ago
https://aistudio.google.com/generate-speech?model=gemini-3.8...
simonw 2 hours ago
accountrequired 4 hours ago
How long is this stored? What could go wrong? :P
kmoser 3 hours ago
pixl97 an hour ago
hatingisok an hour ago
maelito 4 hours ago
Having a voice under 1Mo is crazy, even if it sounds robotic.
112233 4 hours ago
burkaman 4 hours ago
Thaxll 3 hours ago
x3haloed 3 hours ago
freedomben 3 hours ago
VariousPrograms 2 hours ago
Different models have different strengths. If you throw an entire ebook at a model you're going to get a different result than if you craft a perfect 10 second sentence with a model that supports voice direction and emotion tags, so you should try a bunch depending on your use case.
rhdunn 2 hours ago
If you're after quality then Qwen3 TTS is a very good model esp. if you take some effort to craft a voice file. It is slow, so isn't practical for real-time voices (like assistants). It can also occasionally switch to a different voice to the one provided, so you may want to break up the text being processed.
I've not yet tried other recent/recentish models.
If you are after performance then two options from older models are:
1. flite with a HTS (Hidden Markov Model) voice like cmu_us_rms (male) or cmu_us_slt (female);
2. espeak/espeak-ng with an MBROLA (an Overlapped Add model) voice (mb-us1, mb-de5-en, etc.).
Alternatively, you could try using Qwen3 TTS or over voice changing model with the CMU Arctic (http://www.festvox.org/cmu_arctic/) voice data which includes audio for the rms and slt voices among others.
If you're feeling adventurous you could also try fine tuning one of the TTS models on that data to create a custom voice, though the data is likely to be in the training data for the voices, so using an audio sample may be sufficient depending on the TTS model.
newhotelowner 16 minutes ago
xnx 4 hours ago
mamudo 4 hours ago
laweijfmvo 4 hours ago
nater5000 4 hours ago
Also weird that there are no "neutral gender" voices in the English language. There's also limited "use cases," like the "Gaming" use case is empty?
And there's no pricing listed anywhere.
I don't know, I guess their roll out is a bit sloppy. It's a bit of a shame, though, since the voices which are available all sound like generic Gemini voices to me. Nothing stands out is being particularly interesting or impressive about this.
yipinwong an hour ago
They are creating gemini SOTA (not really any more), flash versions, text-to-speech, video (omni), etc.
I can see they want to create an ecosystem, but I see no focus in any one area.
Melatonic 36 minutes ago
On top of that I would imagine the research side of Google might disk over things from one modality being useful to another - something like an audio optimising or memory optimising for text to speech could maybe also be useful for translation or world models. Etc etc
burkaman 4 hours ago
avazhi 4 hours ago
Um, what?
burkaman 4 hours ago
Imagine someone showing you that they've trained their dog to hold a paintbrush and paint. There would be no contradiction between "this is incredible" and "these paintings suck".
kanbankaren 2 hours ago
I listened to some of the voices. The male voices are believable while all the female voices sound the same and artificial. For some reason, it also reminds me of the voices in Toy Story movies.
Bias in the training data?
AyanamiKaine 2 hours ago
pixl97 an hour ago
sgc 4 hours ago
thevinter 4 hours ago
Price per hour:
- 3.8 Flash TTS, standard: $0.81
- 3.8 Flash TTS, batch: $0.41
- 3.8 Flash‑Lite TTS, standard: $0.54
- 3.8 Flash‑Lite TTS, batch: $0.27
sgc 3 hours ago
eis 2 hours ago
Official pricing can be seen here: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing#gemini-3.8-fla...
nitroedge 4 hours ago
$0.50 per hour pricing could last a long time with back and forth conversation use.
LarsDu88 3 hours ago
cainxinth 3 hours ago
Melatonic 33 minutes ago
perrohunter 4 hours ago
fullstackwife 4 hours ago
dadoum 3 hours ago