Nitter and XCancel resume service after legal advice (github.com)

752 pointsby zImPatrick17 hours ago329 comments
https://github.com/zedeus/nitter

https://xcancel.com/cdclegal

https://nitter.net/

https://xcancel.com/

codechicago277 16 hours ago

Few details but glad to see the project will continue. Given how much crucial information is posted exclusively to X, having an alternative frontend is important.

Interesting that they were inspired by Invidious (alternative YouTube frontend). That’s another project that could use some love. Hopefully AI coding tools can do some good and make it easier for these projects to find ways into the walled gardens and work around the counter measures.

Waiting for the day all the social networks allow api access and become usable again. Maybe we can call it “agent first” to help move things along.

lukan 15 hours ago

"Maybe we can call it “agent first” to help move things along."

"Agent First" API access for social networks. What could possibly go wrong.

tempodox 13 hours ago

And the irony is that we don’t even need APIs for social networks to drown in botspam.

literalAardvark 6 hours ago

I mean... It'd change nothing for the worse. It's regular users that are getting screwed by lack of API.

gloosx 15 hours ago

If you dont mind, could you share an example of information posted exclusively on twitter which was crucial to you? Just curious;)

codechicago277 15 hours ago

A few recent examples: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/currencies/articles/bessen... https://theprint.in/world/us-military-says-it-completed-late... https://www.reuters.com/technology/brad-lightcap-leaving-ope...

It’s still the go-to platform for public figures to broadcast unfortunately, so if you want to verify the original comments you need an alternate frontend or an X account.

gloosx 14 hours ago

Looking at these examples, I can't really see how this information was exclusive to X really:

the currency intervention took place on July 31, during active market hours. It was immediately detected by global trading desks and reported by major news wires like Reuters and Bloomberg as it happened.

When CENTCOM issued the statement regarding the strikes on IRGC targets, the text went live on the official U.S. Central Command Media Portal at the exact same second the automated post hit their X account.

Before anything was posted online, Lightcap sent an official farewell note to the OpenAI team. Once an email is sent to hundreds of tech employees, it was immediately leaked to tech journalists.

It seems, for all three examples, the platform was used merely as a broadcasting service for information that was either already occurring in the public eye or was simultaneously distributed through formal channels.

brigandish 3 hours ago

The competition is between:

- needing to look in several places

- looking in one place

Easy to see why Twitter wins, even when information isn't exclusive, which it often is (I would've suggested video involved in news events, which is often impossible to find elsewhere but easily gathered on Twitter).

burnhamup 14 hours ago

I don't know about crucial, but a recent amber alert went out last week. It contained a bit.ly link to the CHP's Twitter page and I couldn't see the information. I clicked on it because the alert was from my town, but light on the details.

Surely a public post on a CHP website would have gotten the job done better.

gloosx 14 hours ago

In this case it seems that linking to the CHP website would likely crash their web servers. Understandable:)

uhoh-itsmaciek 11 hours ago

So allowing projects like Nitter and XCancel must also be understandable, in order for recipients to be able to actually read these messages.

gloosx 4 hours ago

100% agreed, auth-walling the broadcasting service which is de-facto used as a public infrastructure by so many parties around the world is just straight an a-hole move, even though it's a private company and they can do whatever they want about it. Who knows maybe at some point in the future they will decide twitter will only be available with a paid subscription.

yaleman 9 hours ago

The local emergency services uses it as a duplicate method because it's mostly more reliable than any service they can afford to offer... and historically a lot of people were using the site, so sharing helps get things noticed.

progval 14 hours ago

Paris' subway and local train lines each have a Twitter account, and they are the only reliable source of information regarding outages. Phone apps (at least three official ones with different data sources!) and websites can be outdated. Displays in station too (though less often), have outages of their own, and (rarely) even incorrect updates.

gloosx 14 hours ago

Wow, this is kind of a mess, seems twitter won from usability standpoint here

freshpots 13 hours ago

Except that it doesn't because you need an account to see virtually anything on that N#*i site.

gloosx 13 hours ago

Usability for announcers, I meant. Seems it's easier for them to just post on twitter instead of having to deal with whatever interface their internal systems provide

wlonkly 12 hours ago

The funny thing is that one reason that cities, utilities etc. keep posting on Twitter is that it's integrated into their internal systems (or at least to something like Hootsuite that handles multiple social platforms). I'd be very surprised if they're sharing a Twitter password.

johannes1234321 10 hours ago

Twitter was in a great space for those kind of things. They had a big user base, a simple format and a working API, which was free for those kinds of things. Toolbuilders integrated it. No platform took over as clear successor.

Of course such information should be on the operator's website as primary source ...

antif 9 hours ago

Twitter won by pulling the rug!

They changed terms against their captive users and forced policy changes to end open publishing and firehose APIs—which the organization had once championed and enshrined.

koyote 11 hours ago

It almost seems like we need laws that information about public services have to be available on a public website (as opposed to a third-party website that requires registration).

I personally do not know anyone in real life with a twitter account (although I have one, I have not used it in over 15 years), I wonder how many people just go without this information and are angry that it's (seemingly) not available.

parineum 9 hours ago

as much as I dislike when people proselytize mastodon, it seems like a very tidy solution to this problem.

marcosdumay 9 hours ago

As long as the service provider runs an instance in their infrastructure and allows everybody to read.

That said, RSS seems way simpler.

parineum 8 hours ago

I don't disagree and I'm not a mastodon user but, as far as I know, if you local gov hosted an instance and your state gov did too, you could, essentially, join both and see them together?

RSS aggregation seems like the solution to me but I think we've got to admit defeat on that one because it's been around forever and people don't use it.

cxr 7 hours ago

Pretty much every podcast in the world and all of their listeners are using RSS. WordPress powers something like 30% of the Web, and most of the operators behind those sites are publishing RSS whether they know it or not.

numpad0 8 hours ago

RSS and IRC need new apps and new means to self host. To do that, there probably has to be new DNS.

prmoustache 6 hours ago

A mastodon account provides an rss feed by default so both solutions coexist without duplicating the work.

quadrifoliate 8 hours ago

> It almost seems like we need laws that information about public services have to be available on a public website

Won't happen in the US/UK because the governments are in Elon's pockets. Won't happen in the EU because they are incapable of getting anything done.

So unless you're in a jurisdiction other than the above three I wouldn't hold your breath about any laws being passed about this.

bentcorner 8 hours ago

I think at best you could propose that public information be available without login.

misstuned 3 hours ago

I'm in the UK and tired of basic public services like the railway company posting service updates to X first. I keep a bookmark to the local train company (Northern in my case) on XCancel but while it was down, I was a bit under-informed. The stuff is on their own website, but it seems to appear there after it appears on X, the layout is crap, and there's no way to contact the company other than via X.

A lot of private companies do the same thing - no way to effectively contact them privately, but as soon as you whinge publicly on X they're "on it". Octopus Energy is one of the worst for that.

numpad0 8 hours ago

There's no way France have no clause in its law everywhere that can be creatively interpreted to be used for that purpose. But that won't get enforced unless there will be a better option than Twitter that average Paris Metro employees understand; they would not be dumb, but they would not care. Average people today can barely grasp the concept of a password.

koyote 6 hours ago

Surely it shouldn't be to difficult to come up with a sort of plugin-type approach like I've seen in various 'comments' sections on existing websites:

Simply embed the 'update' feed on a page in the existing website and have some kind of admin panel where employees can easily CRUD some updates.

I guess because even this would not be 'free', twitter ends up winning.

progval 4 hours ago

Or they already have that, but it's badly designed, bloated, or doesn't have employees assigned to it.

croon an hour ago

> some kind of admin panel where employees can easily CRUD some updates

In my experience this is usually the crux. That software always rots, and needs whatever (minimal) on-ramping for employees, as well as access management.

If I could wave a wand at those solutions I'd stop fighting the user and let them post to Twitter or wherever, and just have a public facing page pull those posts as updates for consumers outside of whatever walled garden they originate from.

charcircuit 5 hours ago

X is a public site. Anyone is free to make an account.

me-vs-cat 2 hours ago

I strongly reject that I should be required to create an account in order to read updates about local train service.

smcin 8 hours ago

Doesn't their own Île-de-France Mobilités app have reliable information on outages? Surely it's more reliable than their Twitter account?

trhaynes 8 hours ago

For me a website is much more accessible than a phone app in many situations.

smcin 7 hours ago

Ok but can you answer my question about reliability?

Implicated 7 hours ago

I don't have a horse in this race but I would question the idea that a municipal service has a better reliability record than x/twitter.

smcin 6 hours ago

But who is publishing the outage information to X/Twitter if not the utility itself? I'd be surprised if they do that more timely and reliably on a third-party platform than their own app. That's not the case for any European or US transit authorities I know.

Can any other user of public transport in Paris comment?

philipallstar an hour ago

The information may be as reliable, but:

1. the service may not be - every small provider has downtime, perhaps proportionally to their size.

2. the tools to update Twitter are well understood, and you can get software that does scheduling of posts across multiple platforms, previews of what posts will look like, etc etc, and said preview works well on the many platforms that people are already using. People doing the updating may prefer to use those tools over what the internal tool gives them.

progval 4 hours ago

It's the one I use the most, but in my experience it's lagging behind the Twitter accounts. It's also noisy because it puts last-minute outages at the same level as minor month-long schedule change (which can't be dismissed), so some lines (eg. line R) are almost always displayed as having issues.

Oxodao 2 hours ago

This app is just garbage. Can't even use it if you are rooted.

PennRobotics an hour ago

It's been a while since I've used Twitter, but I thought the tweet ordering was never chronological. Has this changed? You just have to trust that the algorithm will always surface relevant information to the top of the feed?

Macha 14 hours ago

Irish rail posts about train delays exclusively on Twitter

gloosx 14 hours ago

Good one, and a heavily criticised one it seems;) Shame on Irish rail for doing this!

sjourner 13 hours ago

They don't use Twitter, but my university exclusively uses Facebook for news and relevant announcements like scholarships, days off due to weather, etc. they won't even use their official webpage but for posting the official calendar...

mosura 13 hours ago

Both FB and WhatsApp have serious lockin with this sort of thing, far more than X does.

mitxela 11 hours ago

WhatsApp is currently not enshittified enough to be a problem, although they do put an entry in my conversation list to talk to their AI.

debugnik 12 hours ago

Last time my city had a water cutoff due to a broken main, the city hall posted on Twitter (and I think Facebook?) where and when to queue for drinking water sooner and much more often than on any other channels, their own website included.

Animats 7 hours ago

The NYC subway system now writes, on X, "Customer care has moved to the MTA app, chat with us there 24/7. Get service status, arrival times and more all in one place. Visit MTA.info/apps". The web page with similar data is "MTA.info".

There are MTA data feeds, in General Transit Feed Specification format, for program use. Those are for systems that update maps.

The MTA dumped Twitter/X in 2023 because Twitter/X wanted to charge them for using their API, and the MTA refused. [1] The MTA also said that Twitter/X had too much downtime.

When the MTA first got into social media, the person who took the job demanded a desk in the rail control center, so she could see all the displays and immediately hear about problems. If someone mentioned a problem on Twitter, she'd reply immediately. That was the right idea. Few organizations have the guts to put the control room on social media.

[1] https://www.mta.info/press-release/statement-mta-acting-chie...

tokioyoyo 11 hours ago

Any big information fan out is pretty useful for JP twitter. Like yes, we’ll get notifications for flooding / earthquake and etc., but if you want up to date, on the ground videos and etc. it’s pretty useful. Not even talking about the train line scenarios as other commentators mentioned.

There’s a system that is not replicable unless you have majority of the population on the same social media.

qingcharles 6 hours ago

I don't know if it is still the case, but when I was writing some Wikipedia articles I discovered the British monarchy seemed to use Twitter exclusively for some purposes.

byoogle 5 hours ago

Agent First is the name of my startup (https://agentfirst.dev/), which mostly does what you described. :-)

antman 5 hours ago

Whats a credit?

byoogle 5 hours ago

In general, a successful web request costs 1 credit: https://doc.agentfirst.dev/endpoints/pricing

sigmoid10 an hour ago

>Agent First’s supercluster of real, well-behaved browsers bypasses or solves reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare Turnstile, hCaptcha, & other captchas

Can you share how you prevent spammers from simply using this to do what they usually do, or, if not, how you will stop Cloudflare et al. from marking your browsers as bots and hammering them with captchas? Easy access to the plain web for bots is a pretty tough cat and mouse game and I have been playing it with very short term success at best myself.

quaintdev 15 hours ago

Somebody needs to figure out how to move millions of people from one platform to other. Otherwise we will never get better platforms and our current techlords will keep getting richer.

phoghed 15 hours ago

Pay celebrities (and now influencers I guess) like the Twitter early days

dvt 15 hours ago

This was tried with clubhouse and that kind of failed miserably. I think those days are likely over.

phoghed 13 hours ago

On one hand yeah, but on the other hand clubhouse was pretty cringe

mitxela 10 hours ago

Threads as well

vrganj 15 hours ago

I think adversarial compatibility is the way to go.

Move people over slowly as you add new features the old platform doesn't porvide.

phyzix5761 15 hours ago

People want to be on platforms where their friends already are. Its a hard problem to solve because how do you get their friends to move onto your platform when they're people too and have the same desire?

vrganj 15 hours ago

Well that's the exact premise of adversarial compatibility. You just scrape the platform their friends are on and cross-post.

nixosbestos 15 hours ago

There's always the big bad scary word, "decentralization".

But of course, even among HNers, there's amazing cognitive dissonance among "decentralization is hard and takes effort" and "omg, of course the next centralized platform won't be bought by an insecure dictator-wannabe".

I'm not that old, it's played out over and over. I shouldn't even comment here. Decentralization or bust.

exceptione 15 hours ago

I feel your pain, but what about "centralized but under control of a non-profit"? Could Wikipedia/Wikimedia serve as an example of such a model?

OroPla 14 hours ago

Wikipedia has a whole lot of problems, you just don't notice them, because the media isn't interested in shining a spotlight on it like they do with other platforms and the drama that happens there is fairly well hidden, despite being openly accessible for the most part.

People have also been conditioned to mostly trust whatever is on Wikipedia despite years of efforts to hammer it into people that this is not an okay assumption.

It would be better for there to be a bunch of Wikis that are competing with each other evenly. Having only Wikipedia is not a healthy thing.

rsynnott 12 hours ago

> It would be better for there to be a bunch of Wikis that are competing with each other evenly. Having only Wikipedia is not a healthy thing.

... I mean, there _are_ (Conservapedia, Ruwiki, Metapedia, etc). It's just that the non-wikipedia generalist ones are so poorly run that no sensible person would ever use them, and usually have a fairly extreme ideological bent (there's a spectrum; Metapedia originally showed up because Conservapedia was insufficiently delusional for some peoples' liking) which requires them to wholesale make shit up (as the old joke goes, reality has a liberal bias). However, if Wikipedia ever goes all evil, I would assume it'll just be forked (there've been a number of prior forks, but except for Ruwiki they've generally died due to lack of interest).

There are, honestly, serious economies of scale here. Unless Wikipedia actually has gone evil, well, no-one actually wants to maintain 66 million articles (No-one, say, wants to maintain 14,000 articles about bridges: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bridges_...). Specialist wikis work, but it'll take something fairly dramatic to break Wikipedia's dominance.

(In an ideal world, I think this _would_ be more decentralised, but it's just very difficult for that to happen in practice. I think much more difficult than social media, which has never really _fully_ centralised in the first place.)

OroPla 37 minutes ago

Other Wikis nobody knows or uses aren't really alternatives. Just like Odyssee isn't an alternative to Youtube.

Unfortunately Wikipedia exists within a collective blind spot, so I am not expecting the situation to change. At most people will drop Wikipedia in favor of LLMs, which is even worse.

karmakurtisaani 15 hours ago

I really enjoy the "federated platforms are too difficult to use" voices on HN. Quite the hackers these guys!

citric7 14 hours ago

Not sure about hackers but the lack of search is a killer for anyone normal. Also, threads or rather the lack thereof in Mastodon is not great either.

avadodin 2 hours ago

If no normie can use them, what's the point?

Mass social networks are influencer territory.

You do want the reach —otherwise you'd just make a group on Session with your friends or whatever.

The centralized platforms are a dictatorship of sorts but they make the often insufficient effort to include groups that hate each other.

If a Mastodon instance can become that centralized platform, I'll be the first to sign up.

vladms 14 hours ago

I would like decentralization (mostly for resilience in case of natural and human made disasters if anything), but for the control I am not sure it is better. Someone has to make a choice of what is shown. Someone has to moderate things. And I am not even sure who is the best to do that - am I capable to decide a good balance between in-bubble and out-of-bubble content; or decide about the difference between hate-speech and free-speech ? Who can I trust to do that? Would a communist/libertarian/etc. be better than an insecure wannabe dictator?

add-sub-mul-div 15 hours ago

We have better platforms, most people are just too passive to switch. The masses should stay where they are so as not to invade and pollute the newer and better communities with the same problems that inevitably come with high scale.

ranger_danger 15 hours ago

I suppose if we could standardize on some kind of federation protocol and have locally-stored (and synced between devices) identities we could use for accounts everywhere, that would solve a lot of problems, but I don't see it happening.

And in the context of twitter-style platforms, federation to me has always seemed like a "which wind would you like to piss into?" situation where you have no idea what servers/people can even see what you're posting, especially when many (even large) servers not only share centralized error-prone block/ban lists but also keep defederating from each other.

buboh 15 hours ago

What you're describing exists: Its called AT-Protocol and runs Bluesky. See more: https://overreacted.io/open-social/

wrxd 14 hours ago

Having a protocol is not enough. You need also to be in a position to mandate that all the social media company over a certain size adopt it

ranger_danger 14 hours ago

Yes but on the scale of traditional social media sites' account populations, AT users are currently a rounding error. And sites aren't required to provide federation.

shevy-java 15 hours ago

Yes - that is indeed a problem.

The billionaires make using their products quite simple. It was easy to sign up for twitter back when it was still usable. Even before Elon took over, it basically died.

tolerance 15 hours ago

What are incentives for the average person? Their logic seems straightforward: they want to be where their friends are at. And all they want to do there is cycle through their base emotions at a whim's pace.

Whatever politics or technologies that make alternative platforms "better" to some people doesn't matter to most. The idea that new platforms should even have the "millions" (read: the masses) in mind comes across as being antithetical to the trend toward decentralized tech.

pmlnr 14 hours ago

> What are incentives for the average person? Their logic seems straightforward: they want to be where their friends are at

This is some sort of absolute, fundamental difference between the early web and now, at least how I experienced it as a teen in the late 90s in Hungary. Back then I made a site, because you wanted to make something of my own, in my style, as I wanted. There was nobody else online from my friends, and I made new friends online. I actually found my age people on ICQ, within the same subculture.

This "oh my friends are there" approach is what destroys everything. More precisely the people who can't decide for themselves.

tolerance 13 hours ago

Then do you think that the average person's disinterest in moving to different platforms is a bad thing? How does this affect the ideal version of the web it seems like you're advocating for?

trompetenaccoun 2 hours ago

Those users indeed don't matter. The problem is the cool kids are on Twitter & co as well these days. Because that's where they have the most reach. Almost everyone on social media cares about reach, there isn't much of a point to posting things that no one reads.

The old web was a very different place, it wasn't as centralized and there were significantly fewer people around. There were specific forums that you'd go to for specific topics. Say you were interested in West African dances - there was usually the one forum where all the West African dance nerds hung out. At most a couple of different ones. And they were very small communities. If there were issues with the admins or moderation users could and did do mass walk-outs and create a new place.

Melatonic 3 hours ago

That's kind of the same thing though - the people you wanted to interact with were there. They just were a different cohort than what you might find on something like Instagram today.

codedokode 10 hours ago

What would an average person lose if everybody used more open platforms?

tolerance 9 hours ago

What is the average person losing now on closed platforms?

Think about why they should care about your answer and if there's any proof that it bothers them to the degree that they may view your alternative platforms as actual solutions.

mtrimpe 15 hours ago

All you need is to mandate real-time API access for users... Unfortunately even the EU doesn't seem prepared to do that though.

jcgl 15 hours ago

That’s why I think atproto is cool. It’s the only thing I’m aware of that provides for actually forking a public social network.

fatal94 15 hours ago

atproto is very promising here, being able to separate personal data from social platforms will make it far easier for people to mass migrate to other services. Unfortunately this selling point is more focused towards tech savvy people but with personal data and privacy becoming more of a concern to the average user online, and social platforms which are working towards keeping bots away its possible.

coalstartprob4 13 hours ago

atrpoto is great technology but disappointing communities

most people in bluesky moved to bluesky driven by hate and fear instead of love and curiosity

i notice they talk bad a lot about other people's posts in other platforms

drannex 10 hours ago

Echo chamber strikes again, because I see none of that, just love for knowledge, history, and science.

weiran 5 hours ago

Try posting anything even mildly positive about AI on Bluesky and you’ll experience instant hate.

krige 3 hours ago

Well that's just what getting out of the AI echo chamber feels like.

deadbabe 15 hours ago

The platform is the people, not the tech.

grebc 13 hours ago

Likely the most astute observation in all 150+ comments.

mitxela 10 hours ago

The network is the people, the platform is the tech. Which do you need?

If you're engaging in discussions you need the network. If you're reading municipal weather warnings you don't really, it's just a data source that can be copied anywhere.

Melatonic 3 hours ago

Probably where twitter is going honestly. Not unlike MySpace pivot to music and Facebook being used exclusively for Messenger

moolcool 15 hours ago

Anyone remember back in the day when every platform had RSS feeds, and you could aggregate your Facebook and Twitter on sites like FriendFeed? “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish”

import 14 hours ago

I was so sad when they’re acquired by the FB. It was a great platform

mikepurvis 14 hours ago

For a while after the acquisition you could syndicate your external blog's RSS feed into your Facebook profile. Didn't take long for that to get the axe.

echelon 14 hours ago

Google and Facebook fucked up the internet.

The internet we had in the 90's and early 00's was amazing. Everything felt free, indie, hackable, composable, ingestible. You didn't worry about platforms because most platforms exposed their data via friendly APIs (remember when Reddit and Twitter had an API and that they encouraged people to actually use them?)

RSS everywhere, websites with honest to god Bittorrent links. Software you could download and own without a subscription. Forums, Geocities, personal websites, IRC (no Discord ads, server caps, rules against scripting), RPG Maker 2000.

Google and Facebook and Twitter fucked us. The 2010's - 2020's were cellphone incrementalism and walled garden overgrowth.

Hell, even Flash was awesome pre-Adobe. It was buggy, full of zero day vulns, and was inefficient for mobile, but children as young as 8 could build games and animations -- and they were! We got left with a pile of "standards" CSS, Javascript transpilers, competing standards, nodegrunts, and library churn and it was never the same.

Thankfully, I'm starting to feel that AI models are going to let us tear down the walls. We can easily spin up indie experiments again in our spare hours after work and do a lot of neat stuff. It feels like the late 90's / early 00's again.

I think the biggest mistake Google made was developing AI, which seem to be the seeds of big tech's undoing. We can totally overrun them now.

AI = actually a threat to big tech, not a moat. They're going to kill themselves with their own product.

We'll probably build distributed protocols that can finally get the product and UX love that compel people to start using them.

And it feels so awesome to just build things I love - games on the weekend, custom audio players, file organizers, SRS software. I'm loving software again for the first time in a long time. Robotics...

pampas 13 hours ago

And YouTube encouraged people not to use their real name.

mosura 13 hours ago

That Google failed to turn Google Reader into a giant open blogging social network and instead created G+ is something we will still be wondering after Google itself has stopped existing.

echelon 13 hours ago

There are a lot of possible futures for Google. Here are a couple that I see:

1. Google de-ossifies and starts shipping. They have all the AI talent and infra necessary to "own" AI and get people and industry using its models and products. They don't have the same costs that OpenAI and Anthropic do and have a much healthier income stream. They can productively put Gemini in front of more people and embed deep into people's lives. Google leapfrogs Apple, Amazon, Meta, and its other peers because of its incumbent advantages in AI, data, and distribution.

2. Google bleeds out all Google Search ad revenue. People switch away from Chrome to browser agents that have adblock and remove ads. Gemini languishes. Once unassailable Android comes under attack from vibe coded upstarts that no longer require a trillion dollars to compete. Google still sells a lot of enterprise B2B infra (cloud, workspace) and YouTube continues to thrive. Everything else about Google becomes IBM while YouTube becomes Comcast. Still a giant, but a shell of its former self.

I'm sure there are other possible futures as well, but these are the two I see for Google.

I keep oscillating between predictions #1 and #2. Right now I'm feeling #2.

kevin_thibedeau 11 hours ago

They'll start server side rendering sites onto a canvas. I suspect that's what Stadia will be reborn as.

abtinf 5 hours ago

Good. Images consume even fewer tokens than text.

mitxela 11 hours ago

Institutional misincentives at Google. People are promoted for launching a product, and they're promoted away from the product they launched, and nobody wants to maintain it since you don't get promoted for maintaining a product someone else launched.

alex1138 8 hours ago

I had to 'vouch' this comment. It was [dead]. Why? Who sits here lurking this site flagging every single thing they disagree with?

mitxela 8 hours ago

It was [dead] but not [flagged] [dead], which means it was killed by automatic filter. We can only speculate on what that filter might be.

brigandish 3 hours ago

I've seen several strangely dead comments today, perhaps the automated filter has been updated and has some gremlins?

bsoqk 11 hours ago

We stopped having APIs because of Cambridge Analytica.

codechicago277 9 hours ago

They were already heavily limited and essentially useless by then, definitely not enough access to sync your profile to another network.

AstralSerenity 6 hours ago

While I remain anxious about the dystopian future AI may ultimately deliver to us, this has been a clear silver lining in my eyes.

I have an old Wyze Scale that restricts advanced features behind a proprietary mega-app, forcing users to swipe past their other services. I've now been able to reverse engineer their Bluetooth protocol which can be used with tools like OpenScale.

In an older world, this would have been a prolonged endeavor for juice that ultimately isn't worth the squeeze. Now it can now takes place in an afternoon.

protocolture 5 hours ago

I really want them both atomised. Not sold for parts. Not reconstituted into smaller monopolies. Not state owned. Just like, delete both businesses and push their physical assets into a dry lakebed and blow them up.

And then remove all copyright law and patents pertaining to software. So the subsequent players are forced to play nice with everyone.

kitd 3 hours ago

> Google and Facebook fucked up the internet.

I'd say advertising has fucked up the Internet. Everything they (and plenty of others) have done has been to collect and sell personal data to advertising brokers.

phatskat 2 hours ago

Facebook and Google are probably two of the biggest players when it comes to how online advertising has been shaped.

GJim an hour ago

> I'd say advertising has fucked up the Internet

Nothing wrong with honest advertising per se..... back in the day we bought computer magazines mainly for the adverts.

Rather, the problem is the SV AdTech industry which seeks to track me, invade my privacy at every opportunity and is busy sniffing my knickers trying to work out if I'm pregnant so they can sell me more shite.

One observes the FUD those employed by AdTEch are spreading on here about the GDPR; a bunch of people whose very salaries are dependent on abusing our privacy.

cnr 14 hours ago

Only through regulations mandating interoperability and enforced at national level. This is social problem, not technological one. So technology won't solve it

gspr 14 hours ago

We could mandate that any platform beyond a certain (huge) size must provide open interoperability APIs.

Less radically, we can demand that any entity that takes any public money (and of course public entities themselves) avoid communicating solely through closed platforms.

It's insane that the primary public communication channel for e.g. certain UK government institutions and the Norwegian police, was Twitter at one point!

specproc 13 hours ago

This is the correct approach. If these American companies want to operate in our countries, and maintain their positions as our primary information channels, then they need to obey laws.

We need open APIs, transparent algorithms, and above all, accountability.

rsynnott 12 hours ago

This is more or less the approach that the EU is taking with the DMA. As with most EU regulatory projects, it proceeds, ah, _slowly_ (Twitter isn't yet subject to it, for instance, apparently largely because historically it didn't have a high enough market cap, though the new entity where it's been tacked onto a rocket launch company and a racist LLM presumably now qualifies...)

NelsonMinar 13 hours ago

Migration in Mastodon works quite well. You're still confined to the one ActivityPub platform but you can easily move to a new server with a new community and different policies.

In the early days of social media it was a standard that you could get your lists of friends, etc out and then use them to bootstrap your social network on new social media. All the big players like Twitter and Facebook took advantage of that and then locked down their own platforms to make it hard for you to move your social network out of them.

mitxela 10 hours ago

In the early days of the internet it was a standard that people had different accounts on different sites and there wasn't any federation. We're doing it right now - my hacker news account doesn't work on mastodon or on reddit.

Perhaps part of the reason we don't do that any more is that signup is so high friction? It used to be just username, password, confirm password, captcha, submit. But now it's username, password, confirm password, email, phone number, captcha, submit, go to phone, open email app, wait for slow loading, refresh, wait for slow refresh, click email, see long link, click link, "this must be opened on the device you signed up with", back, retype 100 random characters on the computer with perfect accuracy, "email verified", next step, go to phone, open SMS app, wait for slow loading, no new SMS, back to computer, "send code again (wait 60 seconds)", wait 60 seconds, click it, go to phone, finally get a 6-digit code, back to computer, type it in, submit.

Signing up for things is a massive chore now. Because they want so much personal identification data, that they don't actually need for the function because they never send an email or an SMS.

And if you're signing up on the same device you're checking your email and SMS on, it's straight up impossible because every time you switch to the email app, it unloads the browser app and forgets its state so the verification is invalid. You have to keep trying 6-7 times and hope maybe one time you'll do it quick enough that the browser will stay resident in memory.

I actually have at least two phone apps that are social-adjacent that do signup secretly in the background. You just install the app, and it generates a random identifier and uses that as your account ID. Nothing is visible to the user. In the settings is an import/export option for device migration. If you want signups, this is how to get them.

AlienRobot 10 hours ago

The first step is to actually make a better platform.

The problem with all the decentralized alternatives is that they sacrifice usability for decentralization and then almost nobody cares about decentralization so for most people it's only downsides.

viccis 10 hours ago

A common pattern I see is to build a competitor to a platform people are outraged at and then completely fumble the step of acquiring the hate site's userbase by gating your new one behind an invite only system for months.

tripleee 9 hours ago

in the current climate the definition of "better" might not be one you like

the "better" that will win will be what's more engaging and addictive

TiredOfLife 9 hours ago

What is Digg or Myspace

grishka 9 hours ago

Adversarial interoperability works well for this. Facebook did it in its early days — it let you connect your account on then-popular competing social media website (MySpace, probably, I don't remember for sure) and would import your social graph and crosspost on your behalf.

crossroadsguy 7 hours ago

The average person, on either end of political or cultural spectrum, or anywhere on anything for that matter, is fine with wherever they are. Also, the last thing they want is an overtly opinionated and often increasingly hostile population on alternative platforms and apps, sometimes actually moderated by, spearheaded by, benevolent admin overlords. They are less worried about migrating their data, or preserve it, than the hn crowd, criting cron jobs and backup and migration scripts, whenever the need comes. That’s why they won’t migrate, they will just start using the next service and then the next and next. Until then they are not interested and it shows. Serves right for the economic and governance models we as a collective society chose — it applied in everything, there’s no picking. Not that this is how it should be or should not be, but this is how it is.

Barrin92 6 hours ago

>Somebody needs to figure out how to move millions of people from one platform to other

it's been solved, ban the platform. This is a collective action problem. Even if every single user on platform X wants to move to platform Y, as long as they can't coordinate the movement individual cost exceeds the benefit they'd all get.

So the most straight forward way is to get rid of the platform , and everyone will move out of necessity.

iamflimflam1 16 hours ago

I once consulted a lawyer when a large company contacted me.

His response was - they've got a team of lawyers on payroll whose job it is to make you run out of money...

1asf21 16 hours ago

It would be unfortunate for xAI, which abused the TOS of OpenAI for distilling via user accounts, to get a ruling that forbids scraping via user accounts.

The entire business model of the AI industry, who resell and launder the scraped data, would collapse.

Nitter just makes it visible to a human and has anti-scraper measures necessitated by the thieves like xAI.

Additionally, a GoFundMe would reach astronomical proportions given how unpopular Musk is.

kova12 16 hours ago

Latter is probably a factor, because merely being right doesn't mean you won't run out of money while defending yourself from lawyers

terribleperson 15 hours ago

While true, parent comment's first point (that the plaintiff would be unwilling to make the winning argument) would have an impact on their ability to spend the defendent to death. Judges do notice when you don't have an actual argument.

psolidgold 15 hours ago

Serious comment: I wonder how this dynamic will change when AI has some real legal chops. One could spin up agents that could sift through all the BS discovery docs and correspondence they send to waste time and money. The agents could presumably even file the necessary paperwork on your behalf. Obviously not a lawyer, just food for thought.

alansaber 15 hours ago

AI is good at volume, bad at accuracy and nuance. Of all the tasks to go through with a fine-toothed comb (ie, manually) legal is one.

bix6 13 hours ago

And yet all the lawyers are dripping in AI. I got a near final doc from one the other day with a bunch of perplexity bullshit in it. How is this real life…

alansaber an hour ago

Just as many junior devs are serving slop PRs. Unfortunately, you can only take a horse to water.

misstuned 3 hours ago

Genuine question - isn't legal stuff one of the things AI should in theory be very good at? Legalese is like code, in that every word is very strictly defined and there to do a specific job in the text. I feel like that's one of the things AI would be good at writing and interpreting.

alansaber 44 minutes ago

It's far from trivial to set up anything more formalised than a loose taxonomy. People have been trying for a few decades now. AI will help automate this formalisation with graphs etc but it's not good enough yet for you to give a judge 13m LOC of mathlic proving your client isn't guilty.

LatticeAnimal 15 hours ago

Unserious comment: The big company will spin up swarms of agents whose job is to overwhelm your AI agents with legal requests / correspondence, still with the goal of making you run out of money (but now via AI spend).

stymaar 15 hours ago

Plot twist they'll be running Claude Bible or GPT-Galaxy with max reasoning on, against my dumb local Qwen-0.8b and they'll run out of money before I do.

mmooss 11 hours ago

Currently their attorneys cost much more than yours. That doesn't appear to be sufficient.

stymaar 6 hours ago

First: it's a joke.

Second: the US justice system is also a joke. I could fight Google in justice and win in my country (France) and in pretty much any other developed country because a working system doesn't let big actor DoS smaller player out of justice. You obviously can't fix a corrupt syatem with technology.

joquarky 7 hours ago

Perhaps Brandolini’s Law might apply here.

throw0101a 13 hours ago

> The big company will spin up swarms of agents whose job is to overwhelm your AI agents […]

This may be a plot point in a William Gibson novel.

wraptile 5 hours ago

but clearly there is diminishing returns on spend here right? Assuming that tokens will get cheap enough then once we both spend 10,000$ no one's is getting more advantage because both LLMs exhaust all effective paths hitting high rates of diminishing returns making further attack investments mostly void.

ValentineC 15 hours ago

> The agents could presumably even file the necessary paperwork on your behalf.

Someone's name needs to be at the bottom of the paperwork, and those court filing costs would also add up.

worldsavior 15 hours ago

It seems like youtube-dl/yt-dlp survived. t

sourcecodeplz 2 hours ago

different things: this is an online service, not downloadable software.

warrantisall 15 hours ago

Not going to work in EU.

embedding-shape 14 hours ago

Do we know where the main author(s) of Nitter is based? Jurisdiction matters a whole lot.

ocd 16 hours ago

Probably the first time I've read a headline of some kind where good news followed something like "Due to legal advice". I hope the best for any service using Nitter, because the split between X and Bluesky is becoming another red vs. blue making life difficult for everyone else.

add-sub-mul-div 16 hours ago

It's a split between user expirences that do and don't optimize for rage and culture wars and engagement bait. If there's also a de facto red vs. blue split, it's due to which community gravitates to which model of what a social network should be.

timmmmmmay 15 hours ago

Look I wanted to like bsky but the fact is that their userbase has been doing as much rage and culture wars and engagement bait as any other. I mean look at what just happened the other day with the paint.net guy

paulryanrogers 9 hours ago

It seems the paint.net situation was more about anti-AI folks vs a pro AI dev. Not very red or blue coded, nor engagement bait, as far as I can tell. I suppose it is something of a culture war. Albeit without the CEO's thumb on the scales.

skeledrew 16 hours ago

Maybe there could be a joining path: an ActivityPub joining ATProto and Nitter/X or something so no need to miss out on anything by being on "the other".

rsynnott 12 hours ago

Eh, honestly, "entity gets nasty legal letter, entity stops doing thing, entity resumes doing thing after its own lawyers say, 'yeah, nah'" is a fairly common pattern.

ViktorRay 9 hours ago

Glad they were able to get legal help and are back. It’s frustrating to me how it’s so hard to access so many websites nowadays without being logged in. Ridiculous that so much of the web nowadays is just a handful of websites almost all of which seem to have so many restrictions.

dieselgate 9 hours ago

One of the reasons Twitter became foundational was because it was so accessible and open…

willmeyers 16 hours ago

When I got my first cease and desist my lawyer basically asked me if this is a hill you are willing to die on (i.e. spend enormous amounts of time and money on). I with them luck. I suspect a Go Fund Me announcement coming soon.

rfgplk 16 hours ago

You're thinking of pre-LLM times. Nowadays GPT-6 can probably advise them better than all the worlds law firms combined. And probably win too, considering the incompetence (and tech illiteracy) of human lawyers.

opello 16 hours ago

Have citations of case law that doesn't exist been addressed? It seemed like that kind of outcome being punished might make people less likely to try relying on LLM output for legal situations without an expert human performing a review.

15155 16 hours ago

You presume opposing counsel isn't using GPT-6 and other, legal-specific models trained on data ChatGPT will never gain access to. Hint: they are.

Regardless of advice quality, legal proceedings aren't free-to-play, and the adversary in question here has bottomless pockets.

loa_in_ 16 hours ago

Such speculation is just fear mongering and that is exactly what the daft bullies want.

15155 14 hours ago

It's not speculation, it's simple fact. Both Lexis and Westlaw already have LLM integration that smokes the frontier models in this regard.

The best legal professionals, just like the best software engineers, have wholly embraced LLM assistance.

"Gee, we bill $700/hr but just can't figure out how to put a prompt into a chat interface." Please.

gamblor956 6 hours ago

No they don't, and no they haven't.

LLMs have been making so many mistakes that the big firms have slowed or even paused their LLM spend. And that was before CA passed a law relating legal AI use.

Terr_ 7 hours ago

It's kinda-crazy the degree to which legal data--which you need for a fair trial under the law--is locked up by monopolistic brokers.

FFS, we're already at the edge of having to pay to know what the laws even are. [0]

[0] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/03/pro-codes-act-wolf-she...

tyjen 15 hours ago

Advice? Maybe ballpark quality if you can avoid hallucinations. The legal connections that will help net you a win, certainly not.

ValentineC 15 hours ago

A problem right now is that GPT-6 is just a chatbot, and wouldn't be able to file any counterclaims (which involve human lawyers and billable hours) when fElon decides to wage a battle of attrition in the courtrooms.

dgrin91 14 hours ago

Optimistically assuming you can do a lot of stuff well with GPT-6 in the legal space, its still going to be a lot of money - 1. Various court fees may still be thousands 2. You still will likely need to have at least _some_ legal representation. Not as much as before, but still thousands of dollars worth 3. You need to pray that your non-legal brain can catch any issues, both strategic & tactical, that GPT-6 produces because X's lawyers will be happy to pounce.

Cider9986 14 hours ago

It would be cheaper to run it like a pirate site.

https://annas-archive.gd for reference.

mitxela 10 hours ago

Anna's Archive has huge data stores behind it, Nitter doesn't and is easy to replicate. You, yes you, can and should set one up right now. They can't get all of us. If you post it to #nitter:matrix.org it might even get included on the public instance lists.

usern20260720 16 hours ago

It is sad that Twitter is basically a private closed gate monopoly that people beg to use instead of developing alternatives like RSS

graemep 16 hours ago

Social media is addictive. RSS is not. Social media is profitable so worth marketing. RSS is not.

slater 15 hours ago

There was a time when Twitter supported RSS, it lived at @your-username/rss

Then they stopped it, because "eNgaGeMEnT" or w/e

numpad0 15 hours ago

Selfhosting friction has to be close to zero for that to work. And Termux is already way too much.

mnadkvlb 15 hours ago

what is termux ?

muppetman 14 hours ago

Way too much, obviously. It’s an Android app that exposes the underlying Android OS cli, and bolts on a Linux user space. Unsure why it’s relevant to this discussion

wafflemaker 14 hours ago

Termux lets you run on your phone things you'd normally need a Linux (apple) pc or a vps.

Maybe selfhost on an old phone? Just guessing what the OP meant.

muppetman 14 hours ago

Yeah I keep yelling at Mum “Stop logging onto Twitter and develop and enhance RSS” but lately she’s stopped speaking to me.

usern20260720 40 minutes ago

macOS mail application used to receive RSS news feeds. It couldn't be simpler for your mom than that. She wouldn't even need to log onto twitter

himata4113 15 hours ago

Reading between the lines it appears that the only argument twitter had is that they could not enforce content moderation due to the archival nature of nitter. Pretty cool to see that archival sites cannot get C&D'd that easily!

Retro_Dev 15 hours ago

Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm pretty sure they could get away with this because nitter is not an archival software, but rather a frontend or alternative twitter proxy.

jesuslop 11 hours ago

Maybe we should define and spec what is an Open Platform, say RSS, Mastodon, grandma cookies recipe in a txt in an Apache, etc. Then paint a beautiful "open platform" logo and start making some collective noises, some pinky flower good-guy psiops. If reply is it alrady exists, it ain't rather working. Currently civil life is being shaped for the algos and the money, that is ok in business terms, we civilians are not coaxed to post or follow Twitter or Facebook as in an Orwellian bad dream. We rather opt-in, yet the politic process is not more illustrated despite all factual discussions at a chat distance of resolution, rational debate is penalized for being boring and much we are offered is as gamified as the Aliexpress user experience. Let's convince ourselves first that the parallel non-profit internet is a grand place to find the full spectrum of human rant in all its glory and gore. Hail the guy in his basement that made and documented a COTS parts scanning tunnel microscope. That is open platform content. Heck, remember webrings? Megacorps are not the problem, it is us being lazy even as spectators.

elcritch 14 hours ago

Cool to see such a notable Nim based project continue! It's unfortunate that X tries to block Nitter so often, but zedeus always seems to find a path around technical or now legal issues.

The code looks surprisingly easy to hack on: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/blob/master/src/nitter.nim

Polizeiposaune 14 hours ago

Nitter's author has suggested at least once that due to problems with Nim, a rewrite in Go is in the works:

"The long-term plan is to rewrite the source code in Go, as I'm no longer interested in using Nim. This isn't a small task, but building more features with the current state of things is painful. Before doing that I'll fix some feature parity issues, and work on some conveniences for instance operators. Stay tuned."

https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/discussions/1212

dom96 12 hours ago

Honestly seems like a good move. It also isn't likely to be very difficult with the help of LLMs.

MrDrMcCoy 6 hours ago

Curious as an outsider: what sorts of problems are there in the Nim world, and why would things improve by switching to Go?

mathverse 42 minutes ago

Basically lack of polish. Nim's compiler just keeps evolving around unfinished and unpolished ideas never reaching a momentum.

It's a research project of its BDFL and he is alienating the most senior developers and contributors to Nim's ecosystems (ie Zedeus).

elcritch 8 hours ago

Interesting, well too bad. Personally I find Nim more useful and productive than ever with LLMs.

Nitter uses Jester which seems dead for sure, but doing static binaries is easy. Personally I just forked Mummy to continue as MummyNG since I prefer threaded servers so things like JSON parsing doesn’t cause latency issues.

Though that being written over a year ago it’s either not a high priority or harder than it seems. I’ll be curious to see which. LLMs make it easier than ever for others to contribute or to fix up deps.

gblargg 7 hours ago

Door 1: try to take down sites offering a lite version that people prefer over x.com.

Door 2: improve x.com to be better than third-party sites.

Which is, Elon?

hyperionultra 7 hours ago

Door 3: turn off API.

archon810 7 hours ago

To be fair, I don't think X could ever satisfy many of the users seeking Nitter services simply by definition.

davkan 5 hours ago

I never bothered with nitter until elon made the site unusable for people not signed in. If he undid the changes and then sold the company I’d probably a bother to update the url the next time my nitter redirects stopped working.

boelboel 2 hours ago

Making services better isn't the goal of the company, I'm sure they could make it better in a month if they wanted to but they'd lose money (which is what's important).

userbinator an hour ago

How much does he even care about the details of X these days?

I suspect the original C&Ds were just their legal team wanting to "do something" upon hearing about Nitter somehow, and not Elon personally commanding them.

...and I noticed that X did bring back a (quite) limited JS-free "lite version" recently, so maybe they are changing for the better.

numpad0 16 hours ago

It'll be very funny if everything associated with Twitter branding would survive and the other one just didn't

mitxela 10 hours ago

Elon abandoned that trademark, it's up for grabs according to the law, even though a court didn't think so.

numpad0 8 hours ago

That means not even the court cares what Elon says anymore.

HDBaseT 4 hours ago

Not what that means, at least not on a general basis.

Marsymars 5 hours ago

Keep in mind that trademarks are registered independently in different jurisdictions, so IP offices and courts are likely to not align in different countries on that point.

int32_64 16 hours ago

It seems like it would be a trivial statistical exercise to find all the nitter instance X accounts and just ban them, it's actually embarrassing they got lawyers involved instead of just doing that if they didn't want nitter to function.

delichon 16 hours ago

> Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue.

The word "project" doesn't make a clear distinction between the repo and the instances. Nitter is on good ground with respect to the repo. The instances will be much harder to defend. From that one sentence it isn't clear if this is what the legal advice says or not.

Nitter changed their design such that it now requires an X account to scrape through. This was to stay functional after X removed guest accounts. This exposes them to a legal attack through the terms of service that must be accepted for the account, and to technical attack by blocking the scraping accounts.

miningtcup 16 hours ago

The major instances are coming back online.

delichon 15 hours ago

Twitter has a history of tracking down leakers by watermarks.

https://theintercept.com/2022/12/15/elon-musk-leaks-twitter/

Nitter might want to make sure that their scrapes are bit-identical to other accounts to defeat this.

kay_o 8 hours ago

Threat model a bit different, they can just request xcancel.com/unique-string and check what IP or account requested unique-string IMO

mudkipdev 14 hours ago

Anyone else wondering what the "legal advice" is?

kertoip_1 13 hours ago

> YOLO

gblargg 7 hours ago

Redirector is a great browser extension (Firefox and Chrome) to easily automatically redirect x.com links to one of these alternatives, BTW.

Retro_Dev 16 hours ago

duplicate of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589003

zImPatrick 14 hours ago

Sorry, didn‘t see it in the search before I submitted it

Cider9986 12 hours ago

Actually i think you submitted a minute or so first.

Retro_Dev 12 hours ago

I should have checked the timestamps, my bad.

Cider9986 9 hours ago

How can you check timestamps that precisely?

tim-- 7 hours ago

Hover over the English time. There is a title that has the exact timestamp.

m101 11 hours ago

Presumably there’s a future where your ai agent posts all your videos / pictures / comments on every platform you have so we get around the idea of X, for example, being the only one to receive posts?

petcat 16 hours ago

The software project itself is probably fine, but the legal risk is always going to be with the person that hosts it with the intention of facilitating the unauthorized access of Twitter's website. Seems like that could run afoul of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Those people should seek their own legal advice.

miningtcup 16 hours ago

The project maintainer, Zedeus, runs the most or second-most popular instance, and I assume his lawyers decided that was okay.

toomuchtodo 16 hours ago

Host the infra in countries unfriendly to the US and its legal framework apparatus. Continually package the archive as torrents for distribution globally.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567595

miningtcup 16 hours ago

X already knows who the maintainer is and could easily go after him.

toomuchtodo 16 hours ago

They will have to prove he’s operating it, and someone else can orchestrate. Anna’s Archive, Z Lib, Archive.today, Tor exit node patterns.

Put a tip jar out, let’s get archiving. “You can just do things.”

bhhaskin 16 hours ago

Except this is settled case law. LinkedIn tried and lost against scrapers.

miningtcup 16 hours ago

I think that this is different because Nitter uses real X accounts for scraping, rather than publicly available data.

Tostino 15 hours ago

Explain to me why that matters at all in an ethical sense. Especially given the scraping / pirating that's gone on by all of these companies in the last number of years.

andOlga 13 hours ago

When have ethics ever mattered in law?

pessimizer 13 hours ago

Who cares this is a subthread about legal advice.

mitxela 10 hours ago

That is still a form of publicly available.

petcat 16 hours ago

That was a case of scraping explicitly public data that was already available to the general public without any extra effort.

mitxela 10 hours ago

Which is exactly what Twitter is?

Decabytes 14 hours ago

I feel like setting up the social media is a solved problem. And while getting users is hard, if you hook up to the fediverse, you can piggy back off other Platforms. I think the harder problem is making it profitable

MikhailTal 14 hours ago

> if you hook up to the fediverse

No this is the hard problem. HN people live in a bubble. Anything else than signup with oauth and then having access to everyone and its too hard and 99% of people will click away.

SoftTalker 7 hours ago

I think the friction is higher than that. With few exceptions I basically won't use any new service that requires me to create an account. I do all my online shopping on sites that offer guest checkout. Zero chance I'm creating any new social accounts at this point.

leumon 16 hours ago

currently working instances: https://codeberg.org/mv12star/shitter/wiki/Instances

m00dy an hour ago

ok, what's the legal advice ?

throw03172019 7 hours ago

Thank goodness! I only use XCancel for tweets

sparkling 16 hours ago

So X(.ai) can scrape the entire web, but nobody can scrape X. Makes sense.

cdrnsf 15 hours ago

Of course. xAI can also run gas generators to power its data centers and pump toxins into the air around local communities. Grok can generate non-consensual nude images of women (and CSAM). Their owner can make nazi salutes and demolish agencies millions depend on. Rules, laws and ethics are for poor people.

KennyBlanken 14 hours ago

And DOGE can get everyone's personal data but nobody can see crash data from his cars or full reports from government agencies about crashes, or where he's flying in his jet, or where he buys and owns properties...

It's getting to the point where his private security are harassing people for walking down the street in their own neighborhood that runs alongside one of his "compounds."

mitxela 10 hours ago

Everyone does what's best for their own interests. We should not sit down and obey Elon's interests - we should support our own by running more Nitters.

1matin 16 hours ago

Let's hope X doesn't pressure GitHub to take the repo down.

It's actually sad to see how deeply do we depend on monopolies.

ranger_danger 15 hours ago

Thankfully github is but one in an unlimited sea of choice between both hosted and self-hosted git forges all across the world.

Other solutions might not have the exact same functionality, but in this context of mere availability... it really doesn't matter.