Which tools do Claude, Codex and Cursor choose? We measured 17k runs to find out (armature.tech)
natnatenathan an hour ago
nullbio 36 minutes ago
ttul 4 hours ago
Selling to agents is similar to selling to humans. You dump money into marketing to make sure agents find your solution around every corner for every use case you’re well suited to.
tiffanyh 2 hours ago
appplication an hour ago
hexapus 2 hours ago
IgorPartola 3 hours ago
rcfox 3 hours ago
pjm331 2 hours ago
But I think it’s mostly a solved problem in frontier models and the bash tool usage is more likely an attempt to be more token efficient - I’ve noticed it used for making mechanical bulk edits that would be numerous “edit” tool uses otherwise
ryeguy 3 hours ago
nijave 2 hours ago
nullbio 32 minutes ago
lhk931122 an hour ago
thedreammachine 3 hours ago
negativefactori 2 hours ago
akurilin 4 hours ago
elzbardico 2 hours ago
nijave 2 hours ago
Some of these are absolutely wild. Surprised Strands didn't even get mentioned for agent frameworks.
drivingmenuts 6 hours ago
screm 6 hours ago
ex-aws-dude 6 hours ago
screm 6 hours ago
edoceo 4 hours ago
pupppet 6 hours ago
Onavo 5 hours ago
folkrav 4 hours ago
paulhebert 4 hours ago
BikiniPrince 3 hours ago
hbarka 5 hours ago
screm 8 hours ago
Disclaimer: I am a Co-Founder of Armature (YC P26) which sells growth services to dev tools. This study is part of our broader work on how to influence coding agents choices and get products picked.
To understand how agents pick tools we measured close to 17k sessions on an environment where agents run exactly like in the real world, on various repositories, talking to different personas (vibe-coder, junior or senior engineers) in different sizes of companies.
All the results are now public and we'd love to know what findings surprise you the most, here are a few we found interesting: - Claude Code rarely searches the web while Codex almost always does it and Cursor sits in the middle. - Coding agents disagree more frequently than they agree. - Some players (LangChain, Supabase, Netlify, Paypal, Adyen) are almost always mentioned in their categories but never chosen. - Modifying repository context can change the pick entirely.
If you feel like digging, all the traces are there and we probably missed interesting learnings so let us know what you find!
vivifkjo 7 hours ago
By tool I mean mcp server, cli, etc.
screm 7 hours ago
watusername 7 hours ago
screm 7 hours ago
josephg 7 hours ago
I’m sure you - or Claude - built something you’re proud of. But I left your website frustrated.
screm 7 hours ago
kouteiheika 6 hours ago
screm 6 hours ago
screm 5 hours ago
hbarka 5 hours ago
I’m trying to understand why they are opposite. I think it is true, I find myself giving a secondary prompt to Claude to “research this” and only then will it fetch. Codex is bang on fetching already.
edoceo 4 hours ago
arcanemachiner an hour ago
ai_critic 5 hours ago
You are perpetuating shitty practices that have hurt developers for years now. Part of the reason people use AI is because of how useless search is due to the previous generation doing the same kind of thing you propose.
Please do something else with your life.
ai_critic 5 hours ago
A large portion of the utility of AI is the barren ad-driven growth-hacked hellscape search has become. Don't encourage the next generation of these businesses, I beg of everyone.
edoceo 4 hours ago
What can man do against such reckless ~hate~ money?
folkrav 4 hours ago
If we felt like we couldn't trust AI because of slop, soon we won't be able to trust it because it'll push whatever pays them to do it.
DrewADesign 3 hours ago
luciana1u 3 hours ago
mpalmer 2 hours ago
jdw64 7 hours ago
screm 7 hours ago