Does the Sumerian King List Align with Paleoclimate Events? (vectorian.be)

74 pointsby dev_l1x_be5 hours ago24 comments

tehnoslow 5 hours ago

Interesting breakdown. The author clearly put in the work to test this theory. I like that he's not trying to force the data to fit the result but instead explains why even apparent matches could just be coincidental.

animan 4 hours ago

This was fun to read! I wish there was a no tech version of hackers news for this type of content only

magneticnorth 4 hours ago

> I wish there was a no tech version of hackers news for this type of content only

I used to think the same thing, but I've come to appreciate exposure to highly-technical content (outside my wheelhouse) that also "gratifies ones intellectual curiosity." I don't necessarily deeply care about the merits of GUIs and TUIs, but once it's pointed out, I can see the importance of being keyboard driven (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49479837). And I find it valuable fairly often to have a passing familiarity with the fact that something like this is being discussed by intellectuals in the tech space.

For smart, curious people, exposure is valuable even if you don't have the time to understand something very well.

steveBK123 4 hours ago

To be more specific, I think most of us would like to have a "not the current tech thing" page. So a front page that isn't 50-90% LLM content in 2026. In 2020 that would be crypto. Etc

krapp 3 hours ago

From what I've observed (from the complaints people make about what is and isn't "HN worthy") most people who voice an opinion would prefer HN only have technical stories. It's common enough that it's explicitly called out in the guidelines: (On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups.)

This is a forum run by a Silicon Valley startup incubator. Unfortunately tech stories and whatever the current tech thing is will always dominate. And HN's design ethos of "no silos" means everyone has to see all of that content, and it will always push everything else down, especially anything non-technical (unless the mods force it up, which they can and sometimes do.)

The only way to get what you want (I do think it's an interesting idea and I'd like to see it) would be to start another forum entirely or else build a third party client to filter out all of the AI slop. Such stories will always be diamonds in the rough here.

Krssst an hour ago

https://www.unslop.news/ has been a breeze of fresh air to avoid all the LLM news. I don't care so much about them but there's so much LLM-adjacent content that it requires actual effort to find the non-LLM stuff.

ksymph 3 hours ago

I believe the parent comment was wishing for a separate site for non-tech topics because they want to see more, not less.

mtklein 3 hours ago

That's kind of what reddit used to feel like when it was brand new. Can you believe it?

CalRobert 26 minutes ago

Bubbles.town is sorta there, but there’s a lot of fluff

mjd 5 hours ago

Short answer: no.

Interesting nevertheless.

alephnerd 4 hours ago

Honestly would love to deep dive into Sumerian literature. Sadly much of it is still untranslated or in the annals of UChicago.

krzs9 4 hours ago

I can certainly recommend :

1. The Literature of Ancient Sumer - Jeremy Black. It is a quite substantial anthology, has myths, hymns, laments, royal praise poetry, proverbs, literary debates, etc.

2. Myths from Mesopotamia - Stephanie Dalley. I bought this for Gilgamesh, loved the rest of it too. One of my most treasured books.

3. Weavers, Scribes, and Kings - Amanda Podany. Not Sumerian literature, but my favorite comprehensive history book covering all of Mesopotamian history. I mention this particularly because all the literature we do have came to us through scribes, and this book gets into whatever we can know about their internal lives really well. Reading about their tutoring and how they learnt to write, what we can deduce about how their lessons were structured - fascinating stuff.

For such an ancient civilization, it is astounding how much we do have and how closely we can meet them.

[1] https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-literature-of-an...

[2] https://global.oup.com/academic/product/myths-from-mesopotam...

[3] https://global.oup.com/academic/product/weavers-scribes-and-...

alephnerd 4 hours ago

Thanks mate! Got my weekend reading material!

quuxplusone 3 hours ago

> One speculative interpretation treats these numbers as a distorted memory of prehistory. Under this hypothesis, the reign boundaries encode real climate shifts...

"One theory" implies that someone somewhere has ever claimed this. But has anyone? TFA gives no source for the claim, AFAICT (although I skimmed a bit).

quickthrowman 4 hours ago

I wonder why the Sumerians deviated on the last two lengths from the rule they had on the first six. The first six reign lengths (and the total sum of all eight reign lengths) are all n * 60 * 60, where n is an integer. The last two are not, but they could’ve been. If instead you use 18000 years and 21600 years instead of 18600 and 21000, they fit the same formula as the other numbers and the sum remains the same. They used base 60, and apparently got a kick out of multiplying 60 by itself and another integer.

I noticed the deviation because there are mechanical watch movements that run at 18000 and 21600 beats per hour.

mapontosevenths 2 hours ago

Maybe they just transposed a few digits? It happens. Somebody should try swapping them in and see if the pattern fits better.

mapontosevenths an hour ago

I ran it through the provided program and the alignment was worse if anything.

jcranmer 28 minutes ago

The Sumerians used a sexagesimal notation system; the two lengths would be 5.10.0 and 5.50.0 (which together add up to 11.0.0, FWIW), while all of the other king lengths are 8.0.0, 10.0.0, or 12.0.0.

SurviveTheJive 3 hours ago

You can’t discuss kings without discussing the rich history of Europe with thousands of years of oral and written history long predating the Sumerians and even the ancient Proto Indo-European peoples to which European language and culture is often erroneously attributed.

The dark ages were anything but dark.

Ancient Europe was anything but primitive.

And yet it’s so rarely discussed in the mainstream.

pavel_lishin 3 hours ago

Can you give us a few pointers or links?

dismalaf an hour ago

Not the OP but there's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Da_symbols

Some people also interpret some symbols on mammoth tusks going back 50k years as writing but that's a stretch IMO.

stodor89 30 minutes ago

Interpreting Vinca symbols as a full-blown writing system is also widely considered a stretch.

jfengel 3 hours ago

The "dark ages" were also thousands of years after the Sumerians. Even the Greek Dark Age postdates Sumer by a millennium.

So you're not really filling me with confidence about your idea here. Perhaps you can provide some sort of evidence?

mcphage 2 hours ago

> and even the ancient Proto Indo-European peoples to which European language … is often erroneously attributed

Would you mind being a little clearer about what it is you’re saying here?