- https://groverlab.org/research/2022-05-06-candycodes.html
- https://groverlab.org/research/2026-03-19-disintegration-fin...
(edit: Formatting)
olwmc 6 hours ago
- https://groverlab.org/research/2022-05-06-candycodes.html
- https://groverlab.org/research/2026-03-19-disintegration-fin...
(edit: Formatting)
wgrover 5 hours ago
fwipsy 4 hours ago
Even if these techniques did not produce false positives on genuine products, I suspect that they would not scale well. If counterfeiters realized they were losing a lot of sales through AI detection, they will just use AI to catch the errors themselves.
wgrover 4 hours ago
I'm hopeful that future AI models (perhaps trained for this purpose, not a general-purpose model like I used here) might be able to identify more subtle variations in e.g. injection molding patterns, the surface finish of a pill, things that would be hopefully a lot harder for counterfeiters to fix than a typo.
cmrx64 4 hours ago
qgin 5 hours ago
Gigachad 5 hours ago
As well as the fact they have already done well enough to fool almost all buyers.
trollbridge 4 hours ago
trollbridge 4 hours ago
wgrover 4 hours ago
hn_throwaway_99 3 hours ago
Whaaaattt? How could the author go through such detail and discover that Gemini completely failed in the assigned task (calling all the products fakes when some were and some weren't means that it provided zero correct assistance in this discrimination task) and then conclude "AI could play a helpful role"??? Does the author also conclude that stopped clocks could play a helpful role telling time because the are correct twice a day?
Apparently AI isn't the only thing that hallucinates.
Terr_ 17 minutes ago
muppetman 13 minutes ago
Very odd conclusion to an otherwise interesting experiment.
hankbond 5 hours ago
cute_boi an hour ago
Transformanshen 5 hours ago