Oddly, this article is "adapted from Matthew De Abaitua’s introduction to Olaf Stapledon’s "Last and First Men," which says "abridged" on the cover. I wonder what that's all about.
A Man Who Saw Humanity from Two Billion Years Away (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu)
57 pointsby samizdis5 hours ago10 comments
justin66 3 hours ago
The last I checked, it was weirdly difficult to buy a copy of Last and First Men and be certain you were getting the complete book as it was intended to be read by the author.
contact9879 2 hours ago
It’s freely available from Project Gutenberg.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/79003
The edition referenced in the article removes the last 4 chapters (13–16)
justin66 2 hours ago
The book entered the public domain since I looked into it. Fun!
contact9879 2 hours ago
Yep! It became public domain in the United States this year. But it's been public domain in Canada since 2020 (70y after death) and has been available from Canada's Project Gutenberg equivalent: https://www.fadedpage.com/showbook.php?pid=20200531
nuclearsugar an hour ago
The book that he wrote next, Star Maker, is a wonderful read and is quite early for the genre of scifi. Incredible scope and I still think about it often.
Primer81 2 hours ago
Love these kinds of stories. Reminds me of the novel series "Foundation" by Isaac Asimov.
nahuel0x 19 minutes ago
Because Stapledon influenced Foundation directly, acknowledged by Asimov in his own autobiography.
simianwords an hour ago
> “Last and First Men” is not progressive
strange thing to claim if you have read the book when there's a clear trending line in a specific dimension. what its not is monotonic.
simianwords an hour ago
I'm not impressed with the article - boring and treats the book as an archeological study instead of attending to the immensity of the book's contents and predictions.
"Huxley" this, "Wells" that. Ugh! It is hard to make this book look boring but this article's author has done it.
Apologies in advance for the curmudgeonly tone.
Exoristos 27 minutes ago
I find this comment valuable because it sheds light on how impressive the book is to read in contrast to the subdued treatment in the article.